90 likes | 186 Views
Explore the importance of network measurements in university entrepreneurship, highlighting benefits, challenges, and the need for a holistic approach to foster interconnectedness. Is the claim that networked communities drive university entrepreneurial success valid? Dive into the complexities of measuring networks within universities compared to other entrepreneurial landscapes.
E N D
Blueprint for the Public Entrepreneurial University Brad Bernthal, CU-Boulder Sherry Hoskinson, University of Arizona Ted Zoller, University of North Carolina GCEC October 26, 2013
Claim #1: University ent. measurements in isolation are unsatisfying and miss large swaths of important insights about networks.
Claim #2: Measurement (i) discourages intra-campus fratricide; (ii) promotes inter-campus info. flows; and (iii) proxies are “good enough” to be directionally correct.
“Many of the advantages that attend densely networked entrepreneurial communities similarly operate across campus to advantage densely networked university entrepreneurship efforts.” Is this claim correct? • “Prevailing conceptions of the public entrepreneurial university fail to take a panoramic perspective that focuses upon networks across different types of campus entrepreneurial functions. ” Do you agree? • Is there anything about the challenges of measurement at universities - uniqueness, measurement challenges, causation – that is more difficult in the university context than other entrepreneurial geography studies? • What network measurements would you focus upon? What correlations might we look for?