1 / 9

RECOMMENDATIONS from PlanCoast Adriatic National Reports

Discover gaps, potentials, and recommendations from PlanCoast Adriatic National Reports on MSP in the Adriatic Sea. Explore cross-sectoral challenges, potential tools, and methods for enhanced coastal management.

kamea
Download Presentation

RECOMMENDATIONS from PlanCoast Adriatic National Reports

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GAPS OPPORTUNITIES and the resulting RECOMMENDATIONS from PlanCoast Adriatic National Reports

  2. MSP on the Adriatic • Generally, no MSP yet • Scattered responisibility for marine areas • Few countries have some regulations on MSP (Slovenia, Montenegro) • However, no significant activity • PlanCoast pilot projects as pioneer

  3. Gaps • Old-fashioned vertical structures • Not enough horizontal (sectoral coordination) • Almost no land-sea integration • Not sufficient participation • Data collection&management problems

  4. Potentials • SEA/TIA • Marine Protected Areas • International cooperation: • Adriatic Action Plan 2020 of the Adriatic Forum • UNEP Mediterranean Commission on Sustainable Development (MCSD) • Croatian-Italian-Slovenian Commission for the Protection of the Adriatic • Adriatic Euroregion?

  5. Conclusions/Recommendations • ICZM should be the responsibility of political bodies at all levels: national level responsible for overall framework / regional level taking the lead for implementation • Do not create new ICZM institutions -improve the use of existing ones • Cross-Sectoral Agencies

  6. Conclusions/Recommendations • Link regional approach with case specific solutions • Spatial Planning should play a central role - but cannot substitute ICZM • Create legal framework for MSP • Define basic national policies for offshore development which are coordinated cross-sectorally

  7. Tools / Methods • Improve availability and accessibility of mapped information • Improve stocktaking • Link coastal data collection and management • Agree on systematic information exchange concerning offshore uses • Create regularly updated coastal and maritime cadastre

  8. Tools / Methods • Improve effectiveness of cross-border consultation for offshore development plans and projects • Develop transnationally concerted plans for offshore infrastructure corridors • Prepare indicative guidelines for content and procedure of sea use planning • Prepare spatial plans for offshore areas, where needed

  9. Tools / Methods • Introduce project oriented and cross-sectoral coordination procedures • Use territorial impact assessment (TIA) including EIA for projects • Defining the working methods for the informal dialogue

More Related