1 / 17

Defence Reserves Association Annual Conference 2011

Defence Reserves Association Annual Conference 2011. MAJGEN Paul Brereton HCRESD. RC Strengths. RC roles. Provide niche (specialist) capabilities Provide complementary capabilities

kalare
Download Presentation

Defence Reserves Association Annual Conference 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Defence Reserves Association Annual Conference 2011 MAJGEN Paul Brereton HCRESD

  2. RC Strengths

  3. RC roles • Provide niche (specialist) capabilities • Provide complementary capabilities • Segments of the operational spectrum / reserve missions: e.g. lower intensity operations, civil-military affairs • Provide supplementary capabilities • Round-out, reinforcement and rotation • Provide surge capabilities • Expansion base • Provide repository for trained personnel

  4. Global trends • Influences • Fiscal pressures • Altered security environment • Wider spectrum of capability requirements • Impacts • Constraints on defence budgets • Deconscription • Smaller professional standing armies • Implications • Greater reliance on (less costly) Reserves • Reserves match certain (lower-spectrum, longer leadtime, civil –related) capability requirements

  5. Domestic trends • Operationalisation • Operational tempo • Cost effectiveness • Integration • In Navy and Air Force

  6. Issues • Individual training burden • Time to train and qualify • Officer and NCO development • Aging demographic • Command experience • Career pathways • The governance burden • The future – “after the war”

  7. Integration • Organisational integration • Personality dependant • Benefits largely illusory • Does not foster reserve careers • Less problematical in Navy and AF, but: • Limited and narrow opportunities • No assurance of employment • Service not individual • Integrated effects • Reserve and permanent components together deliver whole spectrum of operational effects, with each focussing on particular segments

  8. RC capabilities • Army: • Domestic security and disaster response • Regional stability operations • Long lead time (predicted) operations • Navy: • Port security • Riverine operations • LOTS • Maritime civil affairs

  9. Ways ahead • Establish enduring RC policy framework • Address Reserve repatriation • Enhance reserve support

  10. RC policy framework • Overseas reviews: • Reimer Report (USA) • Future Reserves (UK) • In the present: • To avoid the no win, no loss argument • After the war: • To set parameters for when operational tempo decreases

  11. Vision • RC is integral part of a total force with optimal balance of permanent and reserve components, having regard to • Capability (RC suited to certain capabilities) • Cost (RC is cheaper to hold) • Culture (RC serves as cultural bridge) • RC contributes particular capabilities to total force, freeing higher readiness permanent forces for other missions • This enables Defence to select the best balanced, most suited and cost effective force for a mission • Conditions of service that support capability requirement

  12. Reserve repatriation • On redeployment, Reservists face challenges different from and additional to Regulars. Reservists find transition from deployment to civilian life challenging. • Differences in post-deployment experiences contribute to this, in particular: • absence of military support network • need to re-enter civilian workplace and community • limited comprehension of families and civilian employers • Positive factors for better outcomes are: • engagement with stakeholders (employers and family) • post-deployment support • civilian job security

  13. Considerations • Predominant issues are: • Need to be understood and appreciated, not rejected or isolated; • Security of finances and employment; • Stability of relationships and living arrangements. • These issues arise in various life domains, so their effective resolution requires engagement with range of stakeholders: • Civilian employment • Family life • Social relationships • Military employment

  14. Interventions • Avoid perception of rejection, in order to maintain Reservist’s sense of worth. • Ensure security of and enhanced standing in civil employment, in order to remove a major stressor. • Maintain the military support network, in order to minimise sense of loss from separation and improve ability to cope and adapt. • Maximise social participation, in order to ease reintegration into family and social life. • Maintain contact and observation, in order to detect emergent issues.

  15. Reserve support • Relieve constraints on availability: • Civil employment • Financial • Family • Significant progress since 2002. However: • Limited understanding of employment protection rights and obligations • Reservists are not empowered • Employers are surprised/begrudging • Limited appreciation of existence and extent of RC role in national security

  16. Objects • Enhance employment protection • Empower reservists by understanding • Every reservist understands basic rights under Act • Develop community/employer culture of embracing habitual obligation to release employees and aspire to it with pride as contribution to national interest • Senior Executive engagement • Supportive Employer campaign • Commonwealth leads as model employer

  17. Defence Reserves Association Annual Conference 2011 MAJGEN Paul Brereton HCRESD

More Related