1 / 21

Stream Monitoring of Selected Sub-watersheds of Conesus Lake

Stream Monitoring of Selected Sub-watersheds of Conesus Lake. Control Watersheds. North McMillan. Long Point. Sutton Point. Experimental Watersheds. Graywood. Sand Point. Cottonwood. Southwest. Stream Monitoring Overview. Discharge Water Chemistry.

kail
Download Presentation

Stream Monitoring of Selected Sub-watersheds of Conesus Lake

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Stream Monitoring of Selected Sub-watersheds of Conesus Lake

  2. Control Watersheds North McMillan Long Point Sutton Point

  3. Experimental Watersheds Graywood Sand Point Cottonwood Southwest

  4. Stream Monitoring Overview • Discharge • Water Chemistry Combine Discharge and Chemistry to get Mass Losses from each Watershed to Conesus Lake

  5. Stream Monitoring Overview • Discharge • Continually monitor stream level • combined with velocity and cross-sectional area to calculate continuous discharge • Water Chemistry • Phosphorus, Nitrogen, Suspended Solids, and Sodium • Non-event conditions - weekly • Event conditions - as they occur

  6. Overview to date: • 16 months of continuous discharge, weekly baseline sampling on 7 streams • 21 events sampled automatically • 714 Water samples delivered to the laboratory • 4246 Water quality analyses completed • Data continuously disseminated via web site

  7. Year 1 ResultsAugust 2002 to August 2003

  8. Initial attempts at BMP Evaluations September to December for each year

  9. Conclusions • Rating curves in place for the 7 streams • Year 1 discharge and loading summarized • Stream monitoring to continue • The year 1 data is low – may be troublesome • Begin to build tools to evaluate the impact of the implementation of BMP’s • More data / time is needed to evaluate the success of the BMP’s

More Related