Model Intercomparison Discussion. Fred Kucharski (Abdus Salam ICTP, Trieste, Italy) and Adam Scaife (MetOffice, Exeter, UK) as discussion leader. General: We have the plan to write a C20C model intercomparison paper.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Fred Kucharski (Abdus Salam ICTP, Trieste, Italy)
Adam Scaife (MetOffice, Exeter, UK)
as discussion leader
We have the plan to write a C20C model intercomparison paper.
Time series of several important components of the climate variability of the 20th century should be compared and analyzed here.
Proposed working title:
A suitable title might be something like "Reproducing climate of the past 100 years".
Another question is:
"How can we use C20C type simulations to test models against observations?"
This is a very under exploited but important area.
1. Annual global 2m land surface air temperature anomalies
Area average of all land surface grid boxes. Weight the anomalies
from 1961-90 in each grid box with the cosine of
latitude before averaging.
2. Southern Oscillation Tahiti and Darwin (or nearest grid point) monthly
mean surface pressure from the model.
3. North Atlantic Oscillation Iceland and Azores
(or nearest grid point) monthly mean surface pressure values from the models.
4. Sahel rainfall
As near as possible to 12.5N-17.5N, 15W-37.5E, June-September
means in mm of total rainfall averaged after weighting with the cosine of latitude of each grid box.
5. Indian Monsoon Rainfall
As near as possible to 10N-30N, 70E-95E, June-September mean rain over land points, averaged after weighting with the cosine of latitude of each grid box.
Area average JJAS precip 70E to 95E,
10N to 30N, over land points only
Data so far from: METF, UKMO, NASA,
CC(CRU,c20c_multim_ensm) = 0.27
Decadal (11-year running mean filter):
CC(CRU, c20c_multim_ensm) = 0.80
We know that results may improve
Considerably in pacemaker experiments
C20C Multi model
As can be seen, on
Decadal time scale
anticorr between ENSO
and IMR is reproduced.
But as well Indian Ocean
seem to play a role
6. PNA index
(e.g. 500 hPa height, [(15-25N, 180-140 W)- (40-50N, 180-140W)
+(45-60N, 125W-105W)-(25-35N, 90-70W)]
7. more series.....
C. Should we collect and compare fields as well?
If yes which (e.g. eofs of North Atlantic 500 hPa height, etc)?
D. What about the pace maker experiments?
Would be interesting to collect time series as well from there?
Results from Indian rain suggest that they improve considerable the performance of the hindcasts.
1. Compare time series with observations.
2. Distinguish as well high frequency from low frequency components.
4. Compare standard deviations, etc with observations.
5. Where possible assess potential predictability and compare with
6. Regress against SSTs to identify potential forcings.
7. Taylor Diagrams (= potential + actual predictability + amplitudes)
F. Anything else?