1 / 0

Watch in slide show mode to observe (modest) animation. comments questions: dan.kahan@yale.edu papers, etc: www.cultu

Watch in slide show mode to observe (modest) animation. comments questions: dan.kahan@yale.edu papers, etc: www.culturalcognition.net. www.culturalcognition.net. Science Communication & Judicial-Neutrality Communication Look the Same to Me!. Three parallels.

justus
Download Presentation

Watch in slide show mode to observe (modest) animation. comments questions: dan.kahan@yale.edu papers, etc: www.cultu

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Watch in slide show mode to observe (modest) animation. comments questions: dan.kahan@yale.edu papers, etc: www.culturalcognition.net
  2. www.culturalcognition.net Science Communication & Judicial-Neutrality Communication Look the Same to Me!
  3. Three parallels 1. How scientists recognize valid science || how lawyers recognize neutral judicial decisionmaking 2. Public conflict over valid science || public conflict over neutral judicial decisionmaking 3. How to communicate valid science || how to communicate neutral judicial decisionmaking
  4. ||
  5. Cultural Cognition Worldviews Risk Perception Key Low Risk High Risk Hierarchy Abortion procedure Environment: climate, nuclear hierarchical individualists hierarchical communitarians Gays military/gay parenting Guns/Gun Control compulsory psychiatric treatment HPV Vaccination Individualism Communitarianism Abortion procedure Environment: climate, nuclear Gays military/gay parenting Guns/Gun Control egalitarian individualists egalitarian communitarians compulsory psychiatric treatment HPV Vaccination Egalitarianism
  6. “The HPV vaccine is safe for use among young girls...” Pct. Agree BalancedArgument No Argument
  7. “The HPV vaccine is safe for use among young girls...” Pct. Agree BalancedArgument No Argument
  8. Culturally Identifiable Experts Hierarchy Communitarianism Individualism Egalitarianism Source: Kahan, D.M., Braman, D., Cohen, G.L., Gastil, J. & Slovic, P. Who Fears the HPV Vaccine, Who Doesn't, and Why? An Experimental Study of the Mechanisms of Cultural Cognition. L. & Human Behavior 34, 501-516 (2010).
  9. “The HPV vaccine is safe for use among young girls...” Pct. Agree Expected Argument/Advocate Alignment BalancedArgument No Argument
  10. “The HPV vaccine is safe for use among young girls...” Pct. Agree Unexpected Argument/Advocate Alignment Expected Argument/Advocate Alignment BalancedArgument No Argument
  11. “The HPV vaccine is safe for use among young girls...” Pct. Agree Pluralistic Argument Environment Unexpected Argument/Advocate Alignment Expected Argument/Advocate Alignment BalancedArgument No Argument
  12. “The HPV vaccine is safe for use among young girls...” Pct. Agree Pluralistic Argument Environment Unexpected Argument/Advocate Alignment Expected Argument/Advocate Alignment BalancedArgument No Argument
  13. Culturally Identifiable Experts Hierarchy Communitarianism Individualism Egalitarianism Source: Kahan, D.M., Braman, D., Cohen, G.L., Gastil, J. & Slovic, P. Who Fears the HPV Vaccine, Who Doesn't, and Why? An Experimental Study of the Mechanisms of Cultural Cognition. L. & Human Behavior 34, 501-516 (2010).
  14. Cultural Cognition Worldviews Risk Perception Key Low Risk High Risk Hierarchy Climate Change Nuclear Power Guns/Gun Control Individualism Communitarianism Climate Change Nuclear Power Guns/Gun Control Egalitarianism
  15. Source: Kahan, D.M., Jenkins-Smith, H. & Braman, D. Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus. J. Risk Res. 14, 147-74(2011).
  16. Climate Change High Risk (science conclusive) Low Risk (science inconclusive)
  17. Geologic Isolation of Nuclear Wastes High Risk (not safe) Low Risk (safe)
  18. Concealed Carry Laws High Risk (Increase crime) Low Risk (Decrease Crime)
  19. Featured scientist is a knowledgeable and credible expert on ... Egalitarian Communitarian More Likely to Agree Hierarchical Individualist More Likely to Agree Pct. Point Difference in Likelihood of Selecting Response 60% 40% 20% 0 20% 40% 60% 54% Climate Change 72% 22% Nuclear Power 31% 58% Concealed Carry 61% N = 1,500. Derived from ordered-logit regression analysis, controlling for demographic and political affiliation/ideology variables. Culture variables set 1 SD from mean on culture scales. CIs reflect 0.95 level of confidence
  20. ||
  21. Three parallels  1. How scientists recognize valid science || how lawyers recognize neutral judicial decisionmaking 2. Public conflict over valid science || public conflict over neutral judicial decisionmaking 3. How to communicate valid science || how to communicate neutral judicial decisionmaking
  22. Did protestors cross the line between “speech” and “intimidation”?
  23. “The record confirms that any distressoccasioned by Westboro’s picketing turned on the content and viewpoint of the message conveyed, rather than any interferencewith the funeral itself.” Snyder v. Phelps, 131 S. Ct. 1207 (2011)
  24. Did protestors cross the line between “speech” and “intimidation”?
  25. Experimental Conditions Abortion Clinic Condition Recruitment Center Condition
  26. Cultural Cognition Worldviews Hierarchy hierarchical individualists hierarchical communitarians Individualism Communitarianism egalitarian individualists egalitarian communitarians Egalitarianism
  27. Hypotheses Pro- demonstrator Anti- demonstrator “Semi-polarization” “Complete Polarization”
  28. Pct. Agree Protestors blocked Screamed in face Pedestrians just not want to listen Police just annoyed
  29. Deadly force warranted by lethal risk posed by driver Likelihood of agreeing with S. Ct. majority Derived by montecarlo simulation based on logistic regression model. CIs reflect 0.95 level of confidence.
  30. “The record confirms that any distressoccasioned by Westboro’spicketing turned on the content and viewpoint of the message conveyed, rather than any interferencewith the funeral itself.” Snyder v. Phelps, 131 S. Ct. 1207 (2011)
  31. Three parallels  1. How scientists recognize valid science || how lawyers recognize neutral judicial decisionmaking 2. Public conflict over valid science || public conflict over neutral judicial decisionmaking 3. How to communicate valid science || how to communicate neutral judicial decisionmaking 
  32. science communication remedies
  33. Three parallels  1. How scientists recognize valid science || how lawyers recognize neutral judicial decisionmaking 2. Public conflict over valid science || public conflict over neutral judicial decisionmaking 3. How to communicate valid science || how to communicate neutral judicial decisionmaking 
  34. Three parallels  1. How scientists recognize valid science || how lawyers recognize neutral judicial decisionmaking 2. Public conflict over valid science || public conflict over neutral judicial decisionmaking How to communicate valid science || how to communicate neutral judicial decisionmaking How to study public conflict over science || how to study public conflict over neutrality : By conjecture and refutation—not storytelling and bombast!   
  35. www. culturalcognition.net “I am you!”
More Related