1 / 39

Time Synchronization in 802.11-based MANETs

Time Synchronization in 802.11-based MANETs. Ten H. Lai Ohio State University. Out-of-sync problem in MANETs. More sever than in IBSS because of hidden terminals . Recall: causes of out-of-sync Unidirectional clocks Equal beacon opportunity

juliette
Download Presentation

Time Synchronization in 802.11-based MANETs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Time Synchronization in 802.11-based MANETs Ten H. Lai Ohio State University

  2. Out-of-sync problem in MANETs • More sever than in IBSS because of hidden terminals. • Recall: causes of out-of-sync • Unidirectional clocks • Equal beacon opportunity • Single beacon per interval • Beacon contention(collision)

  3. Select a subset of nodes to generate beacons more frequently than the rest. What subset? Basic Ideas fastest node+ (connected) dominating set

  4. Dominating Sets • A set of nodes that covers the entire graph. connected dominating set

  5. Constructing CDS’s • Many existing algorithms. • Layer 3 algorithms – useful for routing, useless for our purpose.

  6. A New CDS Algorithm • Embedded in TSF (time sync function) • Nodes exchanging info via beacons • Overhead: 3 bitsper beacon (550 bits) beacon interval window

  7. DS, Bridges, Covered, Uncovered Nodes DS

  8. Constructing a CDS: basic idea • Initially, DS contains a single node. • The fastest node enters DS. • Bridgeskeep entering DSuntilno more bridges. DS

  9. Design Issue #1 • How to recognize the fastest node, bridges, DS nodes, covered nodes, uncovered nodes thru beacons? SA Timestamp Beacon

  10. Design Issue #2 • How to minimize the number of bridges entering DS?

  11. Design Issue #3 • Cope with topology change and node mobility. B A A B

  12. Design Issue #4 • How to merge two subnets? Easy & hard. ?

  13. Design Issue #5: MANET Formation • How to form a MANET from scratch? ?

  14. Another way of MANET formation ?

  15. Assumptions • Formation: MANET initiated by a single node. • Connectivity: MANET remains connected.

  16. Summary of Design Issues • How to recognize the fastest node and bridges? • How to control the number of bridges entering DS? • How to cope with topology change and node mobility? • How to merge subnets?

  17. Rule 1: Let the starting node enter the DS. Initialization

  18. Rule 2: A node x recognizes itself as the fastest if T(beacons) < T(x) for the last k received beacons. The fastest enters DS Am I the Fastest? 1:31 12:01 1.00 1:31 1.01 7:59 1:33 1:00 1.00 1:35 10:01 0:59 1:30 3:45 8.16 1:32 1.01

  19. Solution for Design Issue #1 • How to recognize fastest node and bridges, DS nodes, covered nodes, uncovered nodes thru beacons? SA Timestamp Beacon

  20. Adding Bridges to DS Rule 3: • In each beacon interval, let bridgei enter DS with probability P(i). • Desired properties of P(i)? DS

  21. Does it construct a CDS? R1. The starting node enters DS. R2. The fastest node enters DS. R3.Each bridge enters DS with a probability. DS, yes. CDS, not necessarily.

  22. How to make it connected? • Gateway: a covered node receiving a beacon from a DS node with a far smaller timing. Rule 4: • Let gateways enter DS. 12:05 12:04 12:03 12:32 12:30 12:20

  23. How fast can gateways be recognized? • Depends on the drift rate between fastest node and A. • The higher the drift rate, the easier and faster to recognize gateways. A

  24. Is the resulting DS always connected? • Not necessarily Not a problem as far as clock sync is concerned.

  25. What if we do need a connected DS? • Is it possible to always construct a CDS using only beacons? • Yes • Complicated

  26. A problem: entrance only, no exit. R1. The starting node enters DS. R2. The fastest node enters DS. R3.Each bridge enters DS with a probability. R4. Each gateway enters DS.

  27. Exit Rules R1. The starting node enters DS. R2. The fastest node enters DS. R3.Each bridge enters DSwith a probability. R4. Each gateway enters DS. R2’. If no longer the fastest, leaves the DS.

  28. Exit Rules R1. The starting node enters DS. R2. Thefastest node enters DS. R3.Each bridge enters DS with a probability. R4. Each gateway enters DS. R3’ & R4’. Leaves DS after a random amount of time.

  29. 802.11 TSF max time drift

  30. DS-Based TSF

  31. Problem, Problem, Problem! ???

  32. A different approach (ASP) • A Clock Synchronization Algorithm for Multihop Wireless Ad Hoc networks • J.P. Sheu, C.M. Chao, C.W. Sun, NCU • ICDCS’04

  33. Basic Idea 1 • Adjust C(x) according to x’s rank in speed in its neighborhood. • N(x) = number of neighbors • Slower(x) = number of slower neighbors • C(x) = {max(1, N(x)) / max(1, Slower(x))}^α x

  34. Basic Idea 2 • Automatic self-time-correcting • Suppose t2-t1 > t2’-t1’ (T > T’) • B falls behind A by T-T’ per T’ μs, or 1 μs per k = T’ / T-T’ μs • B moves its clock 1 μs ahead per each k μs t1 t2 T Clock A T’ Clock B t2’ t1’

  35. A subtle detail • In measuring T, A should not be synchronized between t1 and t2. Same for B? • Variable SyncNum • Carries SyncNum in beacon t1 t2 T Clock A T’ Clock B t2’ t1’

  36. Automatic Self-Time-Correcting

  37. MATSF (to be presented at MASS’05)

  38. ASP (ICDCS’04)

  39. Summary • Proposed: a DS-based clock sync protocol • By-product: an algorithm for constructing DS. • DS: mostly connected, occasionally not. • A different approach • What’s next?

More Related