language as the mirror of national identity n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Language as the mirror of national identity PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Language as the mirror of national identity

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 46

Language as the mirror of national identity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 104 Views
  • Uploaded on

Language as the mirror of national identity. Leena Maria Heikkola Finnish Department Åbo Akademi 8th Conference on Nordic languages as second languages, May 10-12, 2007. lheikkol@abo.fi. Hypotheses.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

Language as the mirror of national identity


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Presentation Transcript
    1. Language as the mirror of national identity Leena Maria Heikkola Finnish Department Åbo Akademi 8th Conference on Nordic languages as second languages, May 10-12, 2007 lheikkol@abo.fi

    2. Hypotheses • ”Language as the mirror of national identity – Cod-switching and dialect in the speech of Finns and Italians living in Oslo” (Heikkola 2005) • Use of dialect reflects national identity • Use of code-switching reflects integration into Norwegian society • Italians do not use as much code-switching, but use more dialect lheikkol@abo.fi

    3. Method and data • Based on a questionnaire (cf. http://users.utu.fi/lmheik/liitteet.doc) • Recorded interviews • Transcribed roughly (cf. http://users.utu.fi/lmheik/litterointi.pdf) lheikkol@abo.fi

    4. Subjects • 10 Finnish first-generation immigrants • Reason for moving study, work or both • 9 women, 1 man • age 23-67 • 9 subjects under 30 • 1 Finnish-Swedish bilingual, 1 Swedish-Norwegian-Finnish trilingual lheikkol@abo.fi

    5. Control group • 5 Italian first-generation immigrants • 4 men, 1 woman • Reason for moving work (restaurant, IT, construction) • 31-66 years old • 4 subjects under 35 lheikkol@abo.fi

    6. Why do Finns move to Oslo? • The major reason is studies • other reasons work, relationships • 3 have moved back and forth between Norway and Finland which is typical according to Korkiasaari 1989 lheikkol@abo.fi

    7. Why do Italians move to Oslo? • Only reason is work • 2 subjects have decided to stay in Oslo permanently • Others unsure lheikkol@abo.fi

    8. The Finns’ use of dialect • The subjects report first using their home dialects and later speaking standard spoken Finnish • Only two use their home dialects lheikkol@abo.fi

    9. The Italians’ use of dialect • 2 of the subjects name their dialect as their mother tongue • all five subjects use their home dialect lheikkol@abo.fi

    10. The use of code-switching • I divide language contact phenomena in three categories: 1) Prosodic and phonetic language contact phenomena 2) Borrowing 3) Code-switching lheikkol@abo.fi

    11. 1a) Phonetic phenomena of the Finns • 41 Norwegian or other foreign names • 21 place-names • Majority of foreign words pronounced according to Norwegian phonology and declined/conjugated according to Finnish morphology, see (1): lheikkol@abo.fi

    12. 1a) Phonetic phenomena of the Finns • Niin, paljon eroja on siinä, että jos menee BYGDÖYHIN, siellä syntyneen ihmisen bileisiin ja siellei paljon Riimi-pusseissa viinipulloja tuoda. (Yeah, there are a lot of differences in that, if you go to BYGDØY, to a party of someone who is born there, and you don’t really see people bringing wine bottles in plastic bags from Rimi [grocery store chain].) lheikkol@abo.fi

    13. 1b) Prosodic phenomena of the Finns • 35 occurrences of rising intonation at the end of a phrase (cf. Strandskogen 2001) • Usually connected to borrowed Norwegian words and phrases, but occurs also in fully Finnish sentences, see (2): lheikkol@abo.fi

    14. 1b) Prosodic phenomena of the Finns (2) Niinku, on se, on mulla joskus vaikeuksia niinku tajuta, niinku, jos norjalainen ihminen on mulle SARKASTINEN tai jos se on vaan niinku, jos sillon, jos se ei oo semmonen, niin et, et mikä tarkotus tällä ihmisellä on, ku se sanoo jotain mulle. (It’s like, sometimes I have difficulty understanding, like if a Norwegian person is SARCASTIC to me, or if they’re not like that, so, what do they mean when they speak to me.) lheikkol@abo.fi

    15. 1c) Prosodic phenomena of the Finns • Prolongation of vowels or words occurs in speech of 2 subjects’ speech who have lived longest in Norway, see (3): (3) Seittemän VUOTTAA JAAA, kaks, kolme kuukautta. (Seven years, and two, three months.) lheikkol@abo.fi

    16. 1d) Interference • Norwegian affects the pronunciation of one subject, see (4): (4) (nauraen) ERILAISYYS, siinäpä sana. (naurua) (laughing) DIFFERENCE, what a word. (laughter) lheikkol@abo.fi

    17. 2) Borrowing • Definition = Words that occur in the data 3 or more times, and are declined/conjugated according to Finnish morphology (frequency-based criterion, cf. Myers-Scotton 1997) • The rest of the words categorized as code-switching lheikkol@abo.fi

    18. 2) Borrowing and code-switching Figure 1. Distribution of borrowing and code-switching, N=162. lheikkol@abo.fi

    19. 2) Borrowing • Borrowing divided into i) established loans, ii) translation loans, and iii) other loans lheikkol@abo.fi

    20. 2) Borrowing Figure 2. Distribution of borrowing, N=90. lheikkol@abo.fi

    21. 2a) Established loans • Two groups: 1) commonly used loans (13/16), see (5): (5) Ne, ketkä tykkää DISAINISTA, on ihan innoissaan, et Suomi on hyvä juttu. (Those who like DESIGN are excited and think Finland’s great.) 2) loans used due to interference (3/16), see (6): (6) No kyl mie nyt, siis kyl mie nyt uutiset katon ja silleen, mut en mie noit, mitä ne on, DEBATTEJA jaksa katella. [väittely] (Well, I do now, I mean, I do watch the news and stuff, but I don’t feel like watching, what are they´called, DEBATES.) lheikkol@abo.fi

    22. 2b) Translation loans – Verbs • Verbs form the largest group of translation loans (13/39), see (7) (7) Et edelleen ei oikee, o tälle toiselle ihmiselle voi antaa anteeks, koska se ei oo niinku, se ei oo ollu meillä töissä pitkään, mut se toinen ihminen, joka kysy multa, se on ollu tosi pitkään ja se on nähny mun nimen kirjotettuna, ei mun nimest voi OTTAA niinku siis VÄÄRIN, että. [ta fel] (So still I can’t really, I can’t forgive this other person , because she has not been like, she has not been working for us for long, but this other person, who asked me, she’s been working there a long time, and she’s seen my name in writing, you cannot MISINTERPRETE my name [to be Norwegian], so.) lheikkol@abo.fi

    23. 2b) Translation loans – Others • 14/39 wrong cases due to interference • 5/39 nouns and 5/39 adjectives • 2/39 times • of all translation loans (N=39) 8 are quotations • Half (17/39) of translation loans were by the two subjects who were not native Finnish speakers lheikkol@abo.fi

    24. 2c) Loans – Food names • Largest group: Food names 23/36 (8) Sitte FISKEBOLLE, siis kaikki sekotettu kala on hirveen pahaa, johon on sekotettu jauhoa ja muuta. [kalapulla] (Then FISHBALL, I mean all mixed fish is terribly bad, if it’s mixed with flour and stuff.) lheikkol@abo.fi

    25. 2c) Loans – Others • 9/36 greeting words • 3/36 word trinn (level) • Other words used, but not present in this study; e.g. pensym (syllabus), semesteri (semester), grunnfag (foundation subject), mellomfag (intermediate subject) etc. lheikkol@abo.fi

    26. 3) Code-switching (CS) • CS in the data analyzed according to Myers-Scotton’s MLF Model • Poplack 1985: i) tagswitching, ii) intrasentential and iii) intersentential code-switching • Se nyt vaan on niin, you know. (That’s just the way it is now, you know.) • Waiffin kanssa puhutaan norjaa. (I speak Norwegian with my wife.) • Sitten hän meni kauppaan, and bought milk. (Then he went to the store, and bought milk.) lheikkol@abo.fi

    27. 3) MLF Model Myers-Scotton (1997): CS composed of ML and EL islands and ML + EL constituents: • ML islands: Matrix language words in accordance with matrix language grammar • ML + EL constituents: Matrix language system and content morfemes, and EL content morfemes in accordance with matrix language grammar • EL (embedded language) island: EL content and system morphemes in accordance with EL grammar • In this study: Matrix language Finnish, the embedded language Norwegian, sometimes Swedish or English lheikkol@abo.fi

    28. 3) Code-switching Figure 4. Distribution of code-switching, N= 72. lheikkol@abo.fi

    29. 3a) Tag-switching • Only one occurrence (subject has lived next longest in Norway), see (9): (9) Että tuota niin niin, ne niinku vaatii tavallaan täällä Oslossa, et sun täytyy puhua sujuvaa, tai muuten ei, SORI DAALING. [anteeksi, kulta] (So that well, they kind of require it here in Oslo, that you have to speak fluent, or else no, SORRY DARLING. ) • Element forms an EL island – it follows English phonology and it’s function is sentence-filling • It is also possible that this switch to English is actually an English loan in Finnish lheikkol@abo.fi

    30. 3b) Intrasentential code-switching • Largest group, forms 80 % (55/79) of all code-switching • Largest group also in Kovács’ (2001) study on Australian Finnish (74,1%) and Australian Hungarian (80,3%) • Myers-Scotton: Intrasentential code-switches form 78% • Halmari: Intrasentential code-switches form 78% • Used by every informant (except 3 whose CS could not be analyzed) lheikkol@abo.fi

    31. 3b) Intrasentential code-switching • 9/55 English switches: • 2 phrases, 6 nouns, 1 adjective • 46/55 Norwegian switches: • 32 nouns, 5 verbs, 5 adjectives, 3 prepositions, 1 negative lheikkol@abo.fi

    32. 3b) Intrasentential code-switching Figure 4. Distribution of word classes in intrasentential CS, N=55. lheikkol@abo.fi

    33. 3b) Intrasentential CS – Nouns • 13/38 nouns related to studying, working, or living in Norway, see (10) (10): Öö, onhan meil sit jotkut, no englannin kielellä ei o niin paljon, mutta nyt kiinan kielellä on joitakin semmosia PENSYM-kirjoja kans. [lukulista] (Um, we do have some, well in English not so much, but in Chinese we have some SYLLABUS books also.) lheikkol@abo.fi

    34. 3b) Intrasentential CS – Others • 12/55 Food words • 6/55 other words: 2 family words, 4 Norwegian terms used instead of Finnish words lheikkol@abo.fi

    35. 3b) Intrasentential code-switching • Form ML + EL constituents i.e. L2 content words embedded in ML • Preserve original phonological form • Conjugated/declined according to ML syntax and morphology • One exception: (11) Ei tuu, mut mä luen niinku netistä tota tai sit tota ostan Daagblaa, Veegee. (No, I don’t get it, but I read [them] like on the Web, or I buy Dagblad, VG.) lheikkol@abo.fi

    36. 3c) Intersentential code-switching • 14 occurrences in 3 subjects’ speech who have lived longest in Norway • 2 Swedish, 4 English, 8 Norwegian, see (12): lheikkol@abo.fi

    37. 3c) Intersentential code-switching (12) Sit se sano, mitä se sanokaan, että, SEL OM DU JOBBER HÄÄR? Sitten mää sanoin, että JAA, JÄI JOBBER HÄÄR JÄI, öö, JAA. Mää en niinku ymmärtäny, mistä se puhu. Sitten se sano uuestaan sen SEL OM DU JOBBER HÄÄR.. Öö, YNSHYL, JÄI SHÖNNER IKKE VA DY MEENER. Se vastaa sitten englanniks, IIVEN THOU JUU WÖÖRK HIÖR? (Then he said, what did he say, that, EVEN THOUGH YOU WORK HERE? Then I said, that YEAH, I DO WORK HERE, UM, YES. I didn’t like understand, what he was on about. Then he said it again, that EVEN THOUGH YOU WORK HERE. Um, EXCUSE ME, I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT. Then he answered in English, EVEN THOUGH YOU WORK HERE?) lheikkol@abo.fi

    38. 3c) Intersentential code-switching • Form EL islands within ML i.e. L2 words, conjugated according to syntactic, morphological and phonological rules of L2 • Of all (N=14) 9 quotations lheikkol@abo.fi

    39. Finns’ use of dialect and CS • Finns use almost no dialect at all • Two subjects use their dialects, but this reflects a more local identity than a national one • Finns show more of all three types of contact language phenomena • Finns use mostly Norwegian loans and code-switching lheikkol@abo.fi

    40. Italians’ use of dialect and CS • Italians use more dialect than the Finns, 2 named their dialect native language • Italians use significantly less code-switching and borrowing than Finns • Italians use comparatively more English loans and code-switching lheikkol@abo.fi

    41. Finns’ national identity • Finns seem to integrate well into the Norwegian society • They use less and less Finnish the longer they have lived in Norway • They do not use dialects as much as Italians • They use CS more frequently which reflects their integration into Norway and their new national identity lheikkol@abo.fi

    42. Italians’ national identity • Italians tend to use more dialect, and thus reflect national identity • Italians use very little CS and borrowing, and it is into English, not Norwegian • Italians seem to preserve a tighter community where language is preserved and the new language (here Norwegian) is not necessarily learned • Despite their lack of knowledge of Norwegian they can be well integrated into the Norwegian society lheikkol@abo.fi

    43. Ideas for the future • How does the national identity change over time? • What other languages Finns use in their everyday life in Oslo and how their identity is reflected through that use? lheikkol@abo.fi

    44. Bibliography • Clyne, Michael (1994). Inter-cultural communication. Cultural values in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Gumperz, John. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Halmari, Helena (1997). Government and codeswitching. Explaining American Finnish. Studies in bilingualism vol. 12. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. • Heikkilä, Elli (1996). Alueellisen kehityksen uusi dynamiikka ja integraatio. In Olavi Koivukangas, Kalevi Korpela & Raimo narjus (eds.): Suomi Euroopassa – maassamuuton uudet ulottuvuudet. Muuttoliikesymposium 1995 Turku 15.-17.11. Siirtolaisuustutkimuksia A 18. Turku: Siirtolaisuusinstituutti – Migrationsinstitutet. • Heikkola, Leena Maria (2005). Kieli kansallisen identiteetin peilinä. Koodinvaihto ja murre oslonsuomalaisten ja –italialaisten kielessä. pro gradu – tutkielma. http://users.utu.fi/lmheik/research.html • Koivukangas, Olavi (1996). Suomessa vuoden 1990 jälkeen tapahtuneet muuttoliikeilmiöt ja tutkimustilanne. In Olavi Koivukangas, Kalevi Korpela & Raimo narjus (eds.): Suomi Euroopassa – maassamuuton uudet ulottuvuudet. Muuttoliikesymposium 1995 Turku 15.-17.11. Siirtolaisuustutkimuksia A 18. Turku: Siirtolaisuusinstituutti – Migrationsinstitutet. lheikkol@abo.fi

    45. Bibliography • Kovács, Magdolna (2001). Code.switching and language shift in Australian Finnish in comparison with Australian Hungarian. Åbo:Åbo Akademi University Press. • Myers, Carol (1997). Duelling languages. Grammatical structures in codeswitching. Oxford: Claredon Press. • Nuolijärvi, Pirkko (1994). Migrationen inom och till Norden. In Sally Boyd, Anne Holmen & J. Norman Jørgensen (eds.): Sprogbruk og sprogvalg blandt invandrere i Norden. Bind II. Temaartikler. Københavnerstudier in tosprogethet bind 23. København: Center for multikulturelle studier, Danmarks Lærerhøjskole. • Poplack, Shana (1985). Contrasting patterns of code-switching in two communities. In H. J. Warkentyne (ed.): Methods V. Proceedings of the V International conference on methods in dialectology. Victoria: University of Victoria Press. • Romaine, Suzanne (1993). Bilingualism. Language in society 13. Oxford, UK, Cambridge, USA: Blackwell. • Saukkonen, Pauli, Haipus, Marjatta, Niemikorpi, Antero & Sulkala, Helena (1979). Suomen kielen taajuussanasto. Porvoo:WSOY. • Sentral Statistikk Byrå (2003). www.ssb.no • Strandskogen, Åse-Berit (2001). Norsk fonetikk for utlendinger. Norge: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag. lheikkol@abo.fi

    46. Takk! Tack! Ja kiitos! Comments to lheikkol@abo.fi