1 / 9

Stilianos Kesisoglou

Search for exotic resonances decaying into V + Z using di-jet and di-lepton final states in CMS/LHC. Stilianos Kesisoglou. 2 nd Annual INP Meeting Institute of Nuclear Physics National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos” May 28, 2011 - Athens, Greece. Theoretical Motivation.

jud
Download Presentation

Stilianos Kesisoglou

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Search for exotic resonances decayinginto V + Z using di-jet and di-leptonfinal states in CMS/LHC Stilianos Kesisoglou 2nd Annual INP Meeting Institute of Nuclear Physics National Center for Scientific Research “Demokritos” May 28, 2011 - Athens, Greece

  2. Theoretical Motivation Standard Model predicts that gauge boson self-coupling is possible,for example W W scattering ( W W → W W ) In the absence of Higgs or for a very heavy Higgs > 1TeVW W interactions become so strong that violate perturbativeunitarity at: s ~ 16πv2 ~ (1.2 TeV)2 To restore perturbative unitarity there must be some additional fields (resonances or new physics) not been detected experimentally to date Higgs (or any similar resonance) restores perturbative unitarityin di-vector boson scattering (V=W,Z) and postpones the problem. Several models predict particles that couple to vector bosons Sequential Standard Model W’ coupling to WZ Randall-Sundrum (RS) gravitons GRS coupling to ZZ and WW Techni-mesons coupling to WZ terms ~ s2/M4W sum ~ s/M2W + + + termswithsum ~ – s/M2W

  3. Experimental Signature • Analysis based on the assumption that resonance is heavy • Resonance decays to a Z and a vector boson V • Z decays leptonically: Z → l l (with l = e,μ) • V decays hadronically: V → 2 jets • Decay chains considered: • W’ → WZ → l l j j (Sequential Standard Model) • GRS → ZZ → ll j j (Randall-Sundrum gravitons) • Two fermion system produced in the Z decay is boosted • Fermions emitted within a small opening angle • Special care in the leptonic isolation of each leg • Two jet system produced in the V decay are overlapping • Clustered during reconstruction with a large cone producingone jet (“fat jet”)

  4. Collision and Monte Carlo Datasets MC Signal MC Backgrounds • Collision Dataset • 2011 collected dataset at s = (7 Tev)2 • 2012 collected dataset at s = (8 Tev)2 - ongoing • Monte Carlo Dataset • Signal generation and parton showering with PYTHIA • NNLO corrections from FEWZ (mass-dependent k factor) • Background generation with MADGRAPH,parton showering with PYTHIA

  5. Candidate, Background and Pileup Events • Candidate Events • At least two good quality reconstructed leptons • | η | < 2.5 (electrons) , | η | < 2.4 (muons) • pT > 45 GeV/c • Trigger Selection • Single Muon or Double Electron trigger • Reconstruction & electron ID cuts • Calorimetric isolation (electromagnetic) • Hadronic/Electromagnetic component ratio cut • Cluster shower shape cut • Reconstruction & muon ID cuts • Global muons (tracker muon matched with outer muon system) • Reconstruction & jet ID cuts • At least one R = 0.7 reconstructed with the “anti-kt” algorithm • | η | < 2.4 , pT > 30 GeV/c (particle-flow jets)

  6. Candidate, Background and Pileup Events • Candidate Events • Z → ll Candidates • 70 < mZ < 110 GeV/c2 , pZT > 150 GeV/c • V → j j Candidates • Reconstructed as single “fat jet” • ΔR(jet, l) > 1.0 • 65 < mj < 120 GeV/c2 , pVT > 250 GeV/c • Background Events • Z + jets (dominant), t tbar + jets, WZ, ZZ • Data-driven extraction from mj sideband • Pileup Events • Superimposed min-bias events weightedto reproduce the luminosity profile

  7. Systematic Uncertainties • Standard Model background • Data-driven method used for the background determination • Several systematic effects are eliminated • Pileup (negligible) • Jet Energy Scale ~3.0% • From max difference between pT ± σJES(pT,η) • Expected yield of signal events • Luminosity ~ 2.2% • Jet Energy Scale ~ 3.0% (same as for the bkgr.) • Parton Density Function • From max difference between CTEQ6.6, MRSTW2008, NNPDF2.0 • Trigger and Reconstruction efficiencies • “Tag + Probe” method using Z → l l (with l = e,μ) • 0.960 ± 0.004 (electrons), 0.974 ± 0.001 (muons)

  8. Limits

  9. Conclusions • No significant excess is observed in the mass distribution of theVZ candidates compared to the background expectation fromStandard Model processes. • Low bounds at 95% CL are set on the mass of hypotheticalresonances decaying to the VZ final state • 700 – 929 GeV/c2 (Sequential Standard Model) • 700 – 924 GeV/c2 (Randall-Sundrum gravitons for k/mPL = 0.05) • Analysis to be repeated with 2012 data (at 8TeV)

More Related