1 / 4

Transition to 10G PON: Meeting Initial and Additional Requirements

Discussing the transition from 1G to 10G PON technology, focusing on bi-directionality, increased bandwidth, common system, scalability, and more. Exploring the need for better performances than TTC for clock recovery, low latency triggers, upstream path integration, and backward compatibility with legacy systems. Evaluating the feasibility of incorporating the busy network, achieving low latency, and handling low payload. Examining the possibility of utilizing 10G and CWDM technologies in the evolution towards 10G PON.

juan
Download Presentation

Transition to 10G PON: Meeting Initial and Additional Requirements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. From 1G to 10G? Initial requirements • Bi-directionality • Increased bandwidth • Common system • Scalability • Partitioning flexibility • Better performances than TTC for clockrecovery • Downstream • Low & fixedlatency Trigger & Trigger Type broadcast • Fixedlatencycommands distribution • Upstream • Ability to answerindividually • Backward compatibility with legacy TTC system TTC-PON meeting - towards 10G PON? - S. Baron

  2. From 1G to 10G? Initial requirements • Bi-directionality • Increased bandwidth • Common system • Scalability • Partitioning flexibility • Better performances than TTC for clockrecovery • Downstream • Low & fixedlatency Trigger & Trigger Type broadcast • Fixedlatencycommands distribution • Upstream • Ability to answerindividually • Backward compatibility with legacy TTC system Similarjitterlevel 10 BC downstreamlatency. Probably not reallyrequired for phase 2 TTC-PON meeting - towards 10G PON? - S. Baron

  3. From 1G to 10G? Similarjitterlevel 10 BC downstreamlatency. Probably not reallyrequired for phase 2 Initial requirements • Bi-directionality • Increased bandwidth • Common system • Scalability • Partitioning flexibility • Better performances than TTC for clockrecovery • Downstream • Low & fixedlatency Trigger & Trigger Type broadcast • Fixedlatencycommands distribution • Upstream • Ability to answerindividually • Backward compatibility with legacy TTC system Additionalrequirements • Integrate the Busy Network to the PON (upstreampath) with • Verylowlatency • Lowpayload TTC-PON meeting - towards 10G PON? - S. Baron

  4. From 1G to 10G? Initial requirements • Bi-directionality • Increased bandwidth • Common system • Scalability • Partitioning flexibility • Better performances than TTC for clock recovery • Downstream • Low & fixed latency Trigger & Trigger Type broadcast • Fixed latency commands distribution • Upstream • Ability to answer individually • Backward compatibility with legacy TTC system Additional requirements • Integrate the Busy Network to the PON (upstream path) with • Very low latency • Low payload Similarjitterlevel 10 BC downstreamlatency. Probably not reallyrequired for phase 2 Try out the 10G and the CWDM TTC-PON meeting - towards 10G PON? - S. Baron

More Related