1 / 26

Business and Employment Law Lecture 2 Week Beginning 28th January 2019

This lecture focuses on the four categories of workers (employee, statutory worker, self-employed, employee shareholder) and discusses the implications for workers in each category. It also explores the differences between employees and workers, and their respective employment rights. The lecture examines the challenges in identifying the contract of employment, particularly for statutory workers, and the various tests used by courts to determine employment status. Additionally, it explores the concept of employee shareholders and the consequences of opting out of certain employment protections.

jsexton
Download Presentation

Business and Employment Law Lecture 2 Week Beginning 28th January 2019

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Business and Employment LawLecture 2Week Beginning 28th January 2019 Barriers to Employment Rights

  2. Identifying the Status of WorkersFour categories of ‘Workers’ • Employee • Statutory workers • Self Employed • More recently - Employee Shareholder

  3. Employee • S230 Employment Rights Act (ERA) 1996 defines status • BUT the section itself is confusing which is why it is often left to the Court to decide who is and who is not an ‘employee’ • Why is this important? • Only an employee has full employment protection

  4. IDENTIFYING CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT [II]: STATUTORY WORKER S.230 (3) (b) ERA 1996 • Any other contract (other than a contract of employment) …whereby the individual undertakes to do or perform personally any work or services for another party to the contract whose status is not ….that of a client or customer of any profession or business undertaking carried on by the individual

  5. Implications for Workers • Subordination of the worker created by the desire to change relationship:- • Avoid complaining • Tendency to over work because of a fear of non engagement • Higher incidence of work related stress • Less job satisfaction • Low morale • Less security • Flexibility??

  6. Employee • Does work personally – cannot ‘turn work down’ • Enjoys additional ‘protection/perks’ – company car • Enjoys all statutory rights • Tax is paid at source • Employer is vicariously liable

  7. Workers • Does work personally • Often ‘employed’ on casual basis • May be temporary workers • May be zero hours contract • Tax is paid at source • No security of tenure • Employer is vicariously liable

  8. EMPLOYEES v. WORKERS EMPLOYEES + WORKERS EMPLOYEESONLY • Equal pay for equal work • Non discrimination • Right not to have unauthorised deductions from pay • Statutory health and safety rights • Minimum wage • Working time regulations • Data protection rights • Time off to care for dependants • Part-time workers are protected • Right not to be unfairly dismissed • Right to redundancy payment • Right to be given a statement of principal terms and conditions of employment • Statutory maternity pay • Statutory sick pay • Security of employment after maternity leave • Protection of the right to belong, or not belong, to a Trade Union • Time off rights

  9. Self Employed • In business of their own account • Able to make a profit or loss of their own • More than one client • Protected from discrimination • Protected by Health and Safety Legislation • Must keep own accounts • Pay for premises/vehicles

  10. Self Employed …. • May also be responsible for others as he may sub contract work out • Probably a contract for service but will be liable re: • Discrimination • Health and safety • Etc • Stringfellow Restaurants Ltd v Nadine Quashie [2012] EWCA Civ 1735

  11. EMPLOYEES v. SELF-EMPLOYED EMPLOYEES SELF-EMPLOYED • Working under a contract of service. • Income tax and social security payments deducted by employer. • Vicarious liability of employer. • Extensive duty of care by employer. • Working under a contract for services. • Responsible for paying income tax and social security contributions. • No vicarious liability of employment. • Limited duty of care by employer.

  12. Employee Shareholders • S31 Growth and Enterprise Act 2013 inserts s205A into the ERA 1996 • Employee, in return for (minimum of £2000) shares in the business now able to contract out of some employment protection:- • gives up the right to • Request study or training leave • Flexible working • Not to be unfairly dismissed • Redundancy payment • Increased notice of intention to return from adoption or maternity leave

  13. Employee/Shareholder • S31 Growth & Enterprise Act 2013 • Allows employees to opt out of unfair dismissal protection – minimum £2,000 shares • Opt out of redundancy protection • Does this defeat the intentions of the ERA? • What is the true intention of the employer?

  14. Problems with s230 ERA 1996 • As is evident, courts are often left to decide who is and who is not an employee. Over the years they have developed ‘tests’ to help them • Control test – now rather outdated • Integration Test – also less relevant but still useful • Mixed and Multiple test – pulls the other areas together and is generally used today alongside • Economic Reality Test – what is actually happening in the business – what is the ‘intention’ of the parties?

  15. Control Test • How much control does the employer have over the work of the employee? • Flexible working/skilled workers – • Bramwell LJ – Yewens v Noakes(1880) ‘A servant is a person subject to the command of his master as to the manner in which he shall do his work’ • How realistic is this in 21st Century? Does a football manager tell his player how to play football or does he rely on the footballer’s skill?

  16. Integration of Organisational Test • Integration is a useful test for professional people however, • The test is only really useful for permanent or core workers when in fact even outsourced work might be integral to the employer's business.

  17. Mixed/Multiple Test • Ready Mixed Concrete SE Ltd v Minister of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497 • Mackenna J:”A contract of service exists if three conditions are fulfilled”

  18. Ready Mix Concrete • Thomas Latimer worked for RMC from 1959 to 1963. • He took up an opportunity to start to drive lorries on behalf of the company – RMC set up a hire purchase to allow employees to buy their own lorry. • His new contract described him as an independent contractor even though he wore company uniform and painted the lorry with company markings.

  19. Three conditions • The servant agrees that, in consideration of a wage ...he will provide his own work and skill in the performance of some service for his master • He agrees expressly or impliedly... He will be subject to the other’s control • The other provisions of the contract are consistent with its being a contract of service

  20. Factors the Court will examine will include: • Provision of equipment or tools • Ability to work for other people/companies • Ability to control eg does the worker determine when to take holidays or does he need permission • Who markets the work done. • In RMC – they were small business men, able to make a profit or loss of their own

  21. What is happening in the Firm? • Is there:- • Mutuality of Obligations • Does the individual provide personal service or is he able to substitute his labour? • What is actually happening in the firm – what is the intention of the parties, what is the Economic Reality?

  22. Other Cases to Consider • Market Investigations v Minister for Social Security (1969) 2 QB 173 • O’Kelly v Trusthouse Forte Ltd (1983) ICR 728 • Carmichael v National Power plc (2000) IRLR 43 • Lee v Chung and Shun Shing (1990) IRLR 236 • The Economic Reality Test

  23. Status as a Strategic Management Tool • Associated with Risk: • An employer will choose the most appropriate “employment” contract to suit the needs of the firm • Consider the function of the worker, its importance, the risk to the business if done less well, how easily staff-turn-over can be managed. • Core workers – employees • Non core/low skilled - workers

  24. Strategic Management Tool • The Employer will structure his business according to his needs. • He may use core workers, zero hours contract workers, self employed. • He may also use the device of probation periods

  25. Agency Workers • Agency Workers Gaining rights in line with employees • Some rights gained from day one • Rights to facilities and amenities • Right to be informed of vacancies

  26. Agency Workers • Some rights acquired after 12 Weeks • Same basic pay as if they were permanent • Same holiday entitlement • Same bonus and commission - but only if paid on a personal basis – eg not profit schemes • Paid time off for ante natal care

More Related