Extensions to G/RSVP-TE for Point to Multipoint TE LSPs <draft-raggarwa-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-01.txt>.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
R.Aggarwal, D.Papadimitriou, and S.Yasukawa (Editors) and contributors (L.Berger, I.Bryskin, D.Cheng, J.Drake, A.Farrel, M.Jork, H.Kojima, K.Kompella, A.Kullberg, J-L Leroux, A.Malis, K.Sugisono, G.Swallow, M.Uga, J.-P.Vasseur, and L.Wei)
a) Encode the <sub-group originator ID, sub-group ID> tuple in the P2MP sender template (new sender-template C-type value).
b) Encode the <sub-group originator ID, sub-group ID> as the “first” object of the <P2P_sub_LSP_ descriptor list>
=> do we get consensus of the group ?
1) STYLE usage:
=> new section needed
2) P2MP SENDER_TEMPLATE object and FILTER_SPEC object encoding specifics
=> Section 24.2
3) Review re-merge/cross-over conditions + re-merging or re-pair (case when data plane is not blocking)
=> Section 23
note: requires consensus whether re-optimization may be performed on P2P sub-LSP basis or/and on sub-tree basis ?
=> Section 19
5) Sub-ERO compression re-organisation (after grafting/pruning) device specific mechanisms for SERO such re-organisation (or is the current proposed text sufficiently tackling the issue ?) => Section 3.4, 10 and 11
6) Stitching mechanism detail (P2MP and P2MP, P2MP and P2P) – in the scope of inter-domain effort
Impact of partial re-optimization requires extra identifier => P2P Sub-LSP ID (+ scope)
Refers to the following requirements: