PREDICTORS OF FIELDING PERFORMANCE IN PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL PLAYERS.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Gerald T. Mangine1, Jay R. Hoffman, FACSM1, Adam R. Jajtner1, Adam M. Gonzalez1, William P. McCormack1, Adam J. Wells1, Jeremy R. Townsend1, Nadia S. Emerson1, Edward H. Robinson, IV1, Jose Vazquez2, Napoleon Pichardo2, Maren S. Fragala1, Jeffrey R. Stout, FACSM1.
1Institute of Exercise Physiology and Wellness, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL ; 2Texas Rangers Baseball Club, Arlington, TX.
SUMMARY & PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
BACKGROUND: Fielding performance is difficult to assess, as traditional measures of fielding percentage (FPCT) and range factor (RF) do not take into account in-game activity. The ultimate zone rating extrapolation (UZR/150) rates fielding performance by runs saved or cost within a zone of responsibility, in comparison to the league average (150 games) for a position. Spring training anthropometric and performance measures have been previously related to hitting performance, however their relationships with UZR/150, FPCT, and RF are unknown.
PURPOSE:Examine the relationship between anthropometric and performance measurements on fielding performance in professional baseball players.
METHODS: Body composition [3-site skinfold (chest, abdomen, and thigh)] and performance measurements (grip strength, 10-yard sprint, pro-agility, and vertical jump) were collected during spring training over the course of five seasons (2007-11) for professional corner infielders (CI; n=17, fielding opportunities=420.7±307.1), middle infielders (MI; n=14, fielding opportunities=497.3±259.1), and outfielders (OF; n=16, fielding opportunities=227.9±70.9). The relationships between these data and regular season (100-opportunity minimum) fielding statistics were examined using Pearson correlation coefficients and stepwise regression analyses.
RESULTS: Significant correlations were observed between UZR/150 and body mass (r=0.364, p=0.012), LBM (r=0.396, p=0.006), VJPP (r=0.397, p=0.006)), and VJMP (r=0.405, p=0.005). Of these variables, stepwise regression indicated VJMP (R=0.405, SEE=14.441, p=0.005) as the single best predictor for all players, though the addition of pro-agility performance strengthened (R=0.496, SEE=13.865, p=0.002) predictive ability by 8.3%. The best predictor for UZR/150 was body mass for CI (R=0.519, SEE=15.364, p=0.033) and MI (R=0.672, SEE=12.331, p=0.009), while pro-agility time was the best predictor for OF (R=0.514, SEE=8.850, p=0.042). Relationships with FPCT and RF varied among all players and position.
CONCLUSIONS: Spring training measurements of VJMP and pro-agility time may predict the defensive run value of a player over the course of a professional baseball season.
Table 2.Selected bivariate correlations between fitness components and measures of fielding performance by defensive category.
Table 1.Anthropometric and Performance Comparisons
THE SINGLE BEST PREDICTORS
Brozek J, Grande F, Anderson JT, Keys A. Densitometric Analysis of Body Composition: Revision of Some Quantitative Assumptions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. Sep 26 1963;110:113-140.
Harman E, Rosenstein M, Frykman P, Rosenstein R, Kraemer W. Estimation of human power output from vertical jump. Journal of Applied Sport Science Research 1991;5:116-120.
Hoffman JR, Vazquez J, Pichardo N, Tenenbaum G. Anthropometric and performance comparisons in professional baseball players. J Strength Cond Res. Nov 2009;23(8):2173-2178.
Jackson AS, Pollock ML. Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. Br J Nutr. Nov 1978;40(3):497-504.
Kohmura Y, Aoki K, Yoshigi H, Sakuraba K, Yanagiya T. Development of a baseball-specific battery of tests and a testing protocol for college baseball players. J Strength Cond Res. Jul 2008;22(4):1051-1058.
Mangine GT, Hoffman JR, Fragala MS, et al. Effect of Age on Anthropometric and Physical Performance Measures in Professional Baseball Players. J Strength Cond Res. Apr 10 2012.
Piette III JM. Estimating fielding ability in baseball players over time, University of Pennsylvania; 2011.
Spaniol FJ. Baseball Athletic Test: A Baseball-Specific Test Battery. Strength & Conditioning Journal. 2009;31(2):26-29 10.1519/SSC.1510b1013e31819d31813af31818.
Regression Analysis of the Ultimate Zone Rating/150
All Players: VJMP (R=0.405, SEE=14.441, p=0.005)
Infielders: Body Mass (CI: R=0.519, SEE=15.364, p=0.033; MI: R=0.672, SEE=12.331, p=0.009).
Outfielders: Pro-agility time (R=0.514, SEE=8.850, p=0.042)
Regression Analysis of Fielding Percentage
All players: Height (R=0.296, SEE=0.012, p=0.043)
Corner Infielders: Age (R=0.512, SEE=0.016, p=0.035)
Outfielders: Maximal grip strength (R=0.527, SEE=0.242, p=0.036)
Middle Infielders: None
Regression Analysis of Range Factor
All players: BF% (R=0.313, SEE=2.441, p=0.032)
Corner Infielders: Age (R=0.544, SEE=2.556, p=0.024)
Outfielders: 10-yard sprint time (R=0.527, SEE=0.242, p=0.036)
Middle Infielders: None
Figure 1. The field of play is broken up into 78 zones of responsibility used for calculation of UZR/150. The fourteen furthest from home plate not included in the calculation.
The purpose of this investigation was to identify the anthropometric and physiological variables that may predict fielding performance across defensive positions in professional baseball.