Challenges in hearing aid fitting in older adults
1 / 61

Challenges in Hearing Aid Fitting in Older Adults - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Challenges in Hearing Aid Fitting in Older Adults. Alison M. Grimes, AuD University of California, Los Angeles. What Doesn’t the Public Seem to Know About Hearing Aids?. They work!

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Challenges in Hearing Aid Fitting in Older Adults' - jolene-joseph

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Challenges in hearing aid fitting in older adults

Challenges in Hearing Aid Fitting in Older Adults

Alison M. Grimes, AuD

University of California, Los Angeles

What doesn t the public seem to know about hearing aids
What Doesn’t the Public Seem to Know About Hearing Aids?

  • They work!

  • People who wear properly fitted hearing aids, and who have been counseled regarding reasonable expectations, and who have undergone audiologic rehabilitation, are satisfied with hearing aids

  • Hearing aids do not mean that you’re getting old, senile, incapable, stupid, infirm and all of those other negative stereotypes

  • Their hearing aid is less obvious than their hearing loss

  • Lots of people wear hearing aids, but lots more need to and don’t

  • The cost of NOT wearing hearing aids is potentially much greater than the dollars spent to purchase them

Why do at least 80 of older adults with hearing loss avoid us
Why do (at least) 80% of Older Adults with Hearing Loss Avoid Us?

  • Denial

  • Stigma

  • Unawareness that there is a problem

  • Avoidance of Diagnosis

    • Subsequent avoidance of treatment

  • Minimizing the Problem

  • Friend/relative who had hearing aids that “didn’t work”; subsequent generalized belief that hearing aids don’t work

  • Confusion and distrust about hearing aid salespeople

  • Cost vs perceived benefit

  • “My hearing is normal for my age”

  • “I don’t have a hearing loss—s/he mumbles!”

  • “I hear what I need to hear”

Our challenges and there are many
Our Challenges (and There Are Many) Avoid Us?

  • First, get them through the door!

  • Appropriate and thorough counseling following diagnosis, prior to hearing aid selection

    • Reasonable expectations

    • Listening strategies

    • Other hearing assistance technologies

  • Hearing aid selection based on

    • Specific patient variables and needs/desires

    • Effectiveness over cosmetics

  • Verification of audibility using evidence-based procedures

  • Patient/family counseling

Nidcd va hearing aid trial update
NIDCD/VA Hearing Aid Trial Update Avoid Us?

  • NIDCD/VA Hearing Aid Trial (Larson, et al., 2000) published in Journal of the American Medical Association

  • Landmark clinical study

  • Double-blind, three-period, three treatment crossover design.

  • Conclusion: Hearing aids work!

  • No significant difference among three hearing aid circuits

    • WDRC

    • Linear compression-limiting

    • Linear peak-clipping

  • Subjects showed significantly improved aided vs unaided communication

    • In Quiet

    • In Noise

Psychosocial correlates of hearing aid adjustment
Psychosocial Correlates of Hearing Aid Adjustment Avoid Us?

Kricos, et al., 2007 (part of the report of the update of JAMA 2003 NIDCD/VA Study)

“Despite considerable evidence regarding the detrimental effects of untreated hearing loss, …there continues to be an underutilization of hearing aids by adults”

Nidcd va follow up studies 2007
NIDCD/VA Follow-Up Studies (2007) Avoid Us?

  • CPHI (measure of handicap) scores significantly poorer in non-users than in users

    • That is, greater handicap in the non-users.

  • Participants benefited from extensive auditory rehabilitation and expert fitting techniques

  • Significant long-term subjective benefit and satisfaction with hearing aids.

Why were subjects in nidcd studies successful
Why Were Subjects in NIDCD Studies Successful? Avoid Us?

  • Subjects weren’t different—but their management was

  • Intensively managed by Audiologists

  • Patients afforded the opportunity to evaluate different hearing aid fittings

    • Fittings based on prescriptive targets verified with probe-microphone measures

  • Given extended periods of trial use

  • Able to select their preferred fitting

  • (This is not how hearing aids are typically fitted and dispensed!)

Our challenges duplicate these outcomes in our practices
Our Challenges: Duplicate These Outcomes in Our Practices Avoid Us?

  • Intensive Management

  • Patient involvement in the selection and fitting process

  • Probe Microphone measures to ensure maximum audibility

    • Every time

  • “Trial Period”—

    • What does this mean?

    • Are we stuck with this forever?

      • Legally, perhaps

      • Can we term it something different?

Barriers to seeking care
Barriers to Seeking Care Avoid Us?

  • Denial/Stigma

  • Belief that hearing aids are ineffectual

  • Medical/audiological professionals who downplay significance of hearing loss

  • Cost

  • Sales aspects

  • Cultural/Linguistic Issues

Denial stigma psychological issues
Denial/Stigma/Psychological Issues Avoid Us?

  • Hearing aids = badge of aging and senility

  • Denial

    • Hearing loss is gradual in onset

    • Don’t know what you don’t hear because you can’t hear it!

    • Tendency to externalize problem

      • “she mumbles”

  • Lack of awareness of the psychological, social, emotional, physical and cognitive impacts of untreated hearing loss

  • Belief that it’s OK to procrastinate

Belief that hearing aids are ineffectual
Belief that Hearing Aids Are Ineffectual Avoid Us?

  • Perceived poor performance in noise

  • Friend/family member who has had poor outcomes with hearing aids

  • Real-world performance doesn’t match exaggerated advertising claims

  • Lack of pre-fitting counseling regarding reasonable expectations

Medical audiological professionals
Medical/ Avoid Us?Audiological Professionals

  • Physicians fail to inquire or screen for hearing loss

  • “It’s normal for your age”

  • If not surgically treatable, HNS physicians may be uninterested

  • Audiologists may downplay significance of “mild” hearing loss

    • (tentative counseling)

Challenges in hearing aid fitting in older adults
Cost Avoid Us?

  • Perceived high cost for value

  • Lack of third-party funding

  • Bundled hearing aid pricing model

    • Bad for consumers?

    • Bad for audiologists?

Marketing and sales
Marketing and Sales Avoid Us?

  • Unrealistic advertising

  • Confusion about who sells hearing aids

    • What are their qualifications?

  • From whom should hearing aids be purchased?

    • Audiologist?

    • Hearing aid salesperson?

    • Physician?

    • Internet?

    • Mail-order?

  • Any device that’s sold with a 30-day “trial period” sets up expectation of failure

  • Long history of sales abuses

  • Cultural and linguistic barriers
    Cultural and Linguistic Barriers Avoid Us?

    • Well known that intervention including hearing aids underutilized

      • Lack of providers with cultural/ethnic/linguistic match

      • Poverty

      • Lower utilization of health systems overall

      • Unwilling/”inappropriate” to discuss perceptions and feelings about hearing loss

    Delay or failure to seek diagnosis and treatment
    Delay or Failure to Seek Diagnosis and Treatment Avoid Us?

    • Auditory Deprivation: ARHL is gradually progressive

      • Becomes a greater issue as period of time of deprivation grows

      • Creates challenges when hearing aids first fitted

        • Immediate restoration of sound

    • Negative psycho-social, psychological and cognitive impacts

    Solution hearing aids
    Solution: Hearing Aids Avoid Us?

    • Necessary

    • Not sufficient to completely address multiple problems associated with speech understanding

    • Necessary to first have audibility

      • Insofar as properly fitted hearing aids provide audibility

    • Then employ

      • Other hearing assistance technologies

    • Auditory Rehabilitation Program

      • Counseling

      • Communication Skills Training

    • (Move to cochlear implant if needed)

    Pre selection considerations
    Pre-Selection Considerations Avoid Us?

    • Patient Preferences

      • What can the patient manage?

      • What can the ear canal accept?

    • Style

      • Custom vs BTE

    • Binaural vs Monaural

      • Or other signal-routing (CROS, BICROS)

    • Cost

    Features selection individualized what s necessary what s not
    Features Selection—Individualized--What’s Necessary, What’s Not?

    • Program and/or Volume buttons?

      • Multiple memories or programs—necessary or confusing

    • Custom earmold/insert vs “dome”?

    • Remote Control Device(s)

    • Ear-to-ear communication—necessary or confusing?

    • Bluetooth?

    • Telecoil—mandatory? Auto-telecoil?

    • “Noise reduction”?

    • Directional microphones?

    • Frequency transposition/compression?

      • Insufficient evidence to judge efficacy/benefit relative to degree/configuration of hearing loss and age

    Hearing aid selection decisions made in partnership with patient family based on evidence
    Hearing Aid Selection-Decisions Made in Partnership with Patient/Family, Based on Evidence

    • Patient/Family Decisions

      • Features

        • VC, PB, remote

      • Color

      • Price

      • To some degree, style and arrangement

    • Manufacturer

      • Depends on the reason that a particular brand is requested

    • Audiologist’s Decisions

      • Signal processing scheme

        • WDRC vs Linear

        • Frequency Transp/Comp

      • Gain/output requirements to assure audibility and comfort/safety across the speech spectrum

      • To some degree, style and arrangement

        • Based on patient needs

    Decision making in the ha selection process
    Decision-Making in the HA Selection Process Patient/Family, Based on Evidence

    • Audiologist Wants

      • Availability of appropriate gain and output across the speech spectrum based on patient’s hearing loss

        • Flexibility to manipulate by multiple frequency bands

      • Growth-room – reserve gain/output

      • Features and signal-processing options that are familiar and with which audiologist has had previous success

      • Good feedback algorithm

      • Responsive and responsible manufacturer with good customer support

      • Price that is justified by features offered

      • Rapid and successful patient acceptance

      • Cords/cables that work every time

      • Software that makes sense

      • Ability to see what the hearing aid is doing when changes are made

    • Patient Wants

      • “invisible”

      • “block out background noise”

      • “high-fidelity” with near-perfect speech understanding

      • Larger, longer-lasting battery

      • Easy to manipulate controls

        • Or no controls

      • Sturdy battery case

      • Inexpensive

      • Distance hearing

      • Lack of feedback

      • Physically and acoustically comfortable and ‘natural’

    The noise problem
    The Noise Problem Patient/Family, Based on Evidence

    The #1 complaint of hearing aid users

    Latest MarkeTrak “listening in noise” shows

    25% overall dissatisfied

    61% overall satisfied

    14% neutral

    Listening in noise

    Related to reduced speech perception

    The greater the degree of hearing loss, the greater the handicap associated with listening in noise

    Counseling to ensure reasonable expectations

    (the advertisements don’t tell the whole story!)

    Noise reduction
    Noise Reduction Patient/Family, Based on Evidence

    • An oversold technology?

      • May lead to disappointment with hearing aids

      • Importance of pre-fitting counseling

    • Better termed “noise management”

      • Makes listening in noise more comfortable

    • Definition of noise varies

      • Noise is the undesired signal

      • The desired signal may have the same spectrum

      • Noise is often others’ speech

    • NR doesn’t improve speech perception

      • Creates greater listening ease

    Noise reduction in hearing aids
    Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids Patient/Family, Based on Evidence

    Highest negative rating is “use in noisy situations”

    Latest MarkeTrak “listening in noise” shows

    25% overall dissatisfied

    61% overall satisfied

    14% neutral

    39% neutral to dissatisfied – not a stellar statistic

    How can this be improved?


    Remote microphone technologies

    Communication strategies

    Cognitive demands of understanding speech in noise
    Cognitive Demands of Understanding Speech in Noise Patient/Family, Based on Evidence

    • Benefit of DNR algorithm is not to make speech more intelligible

      • Does reduce the cognitive effort involved in performing the task

    • Shared attention extracting speech from noise

      • Items presented in noise less likely to be remembered successfully

      • Listening in noise: increase in listening effort

    • Noise reduction frees resources for other, simultaneous tasks.

      • Better auditory memory

      • Increased speed of response to a visual task

      • (Sarampolis, et al., 2009)

    Directional microphones do they work
    Directional Microphones—Do They Work? Patient/Family, Based on Evidence

    • Proven ability to reduce signals at specified azimuths

      • May or may not be “noise reduction”

    • Function less well in

      • Distance

      • Reverberant environment

    • Function less well when the head is not upright

    • Function less well when speech and noise are moving targets

    • May be a detriment when desired signal is from sides or rear

      • Age does not have a significant effect on directional benefit/preference, but older adults have a lower perception of benefit in the directional mode as compared with younger listeners (Wu, 2010)

    • Solutions?

      • Manual switching?

      • “Smart” automatic algorithms?

      • What makes most sense for older user?

    Noise reduction plus directional microphone
    Noise Reduction Plus Directional Microphone Patient/Family, Based on Evidence

    Common in contemporary hearing aids

    Patient may be unaware that processing is happening

    Automatic vs Manual Switching?

    Possible disadvantages?

    How can we better understand how the hearing aid is working

    To counsel patients

    To manipulate variables (if possible)

    Use of pre fitting questionnaires
    Use of Pre-Fitting Questionnaires Patient/Family, Based on Evidence

    • Assists in setting expectations and in making selection

    • COSI

    • Hearing Demand, Ability and Need Profile

    • SAC/SOAC

    • Patient Expectations Worksheet

      • Compares what situation patient is successful in or wants to be more successful in

      • Pre-treatment success vs level of success post-treatment

      • Including realistic expectations counseling

    • Provide basis for counseling and setting expectations

    Assessing readiness selecting hearing aids the coat sandridge and newman
    Assessing Readiness, Selecting Hearing Aids—the COAT Patient/Family, Based on Evidence (Sandridge and Newman)

    • Tool to assist in assessing

      • Motivation

      • Interest in different types of hearing aids

      • Budget

    • Helps quickly move through some of the initial decision-making

      • Opportunity to discuss reasonable expectations (e.g., patient with severe-profound hearing loss wants ITC hearing aids)

    • Patient has already considered some of the initial questions and developed answers

    Challenges in hearing aid fitting in older adults
    COAT Patient/Family, Based on Evidence

    • Please list the top three situations where you would most like to hear better. Be as specific as possible

    • How important is it for you to hear better?

    • How motivated are you to wear and use hearing aids?

    • How helpful do you think hearing aids will be?

    • What is your most important consideration regarding hearing aids? Rank order the following factors with 1 as the most important and 4 as the least important.

    • ___ Hearing aid size and the ability of others not to see the hearing aids

    • ___ Improved ability to hear and understand speech

    • ___ Improved ability to understand speech in noisy situations (e.g., restaurants, parties)

    • ___ Cost of the hearing aids

    • Do you prefer hearing aids that:

    • ___ are totally automatic so that you do not have to make any adjustments to them.

    • ___ allow you to adjust the volume and change the listening programs as you see fit.

    • ___ no preference

    • Look at the pictures (photos of hearing aid styles) of the hearing aids. Please place an X on the picture or pictures of the style you would NOT be willing to use. Your audiologist will discuss with you if your choices are appropriate for you – given your hearing loss and physical shape of your ear.

    • How confident do you feel that you will be successful in using hearing aids.

    • ___ Basic digital hearing aids: Cost is between $XXXX to $XXXX

    • ___ Basic Plus hearing aids: Cost is between $XXXX to $XXXX

    • ___ Mid-level digital hearing aids: Cost is between $XXXX to $XXXX

    • ___ Premium digital hearing aids: Cost is between $XXXX to $XXXX

    Hearing aid fitting appointment
    Hearing Aid Fitting Appointment Patient/Family, Based on Evidence

    • Physical fit

    • Acoustical fit

      • Probe microphone measures with modifications in gain/output to achieve maximum audibility and safe/comfortable MPO at initial fitting?

        • YES!

      • Permitting overall gain/output reduction on day one?

        • YES

        • Just don’t forget to subsequently increase

    • Selection/deselection of features/options

      • i.e, how many programs does a person need on day 1?

    • Counseling, counseling, counseling

    • Reasonable expectations

    • Wearing schedule?

    Should you use first fit and or manufacturer s proprietary fitting algorithm
    Should You Use ”First Fit” and/or Manufacturer’s Proprietary Fitting Algorithm?

    • No…

    • If you want to ensure audibility

    • If you want to ensure that OSPL is set appropriately

    • Yes…

    • If you want to get the patient out the door in a hurry

    • If you want the hearing aids to sound “comfortable, natural” from the first wearing

    • If you are satisfied with fitting earplugs

    Hearing aid verification the missing step
    Hearing Aid Verification: The Missing Step? Proprietary Fitting Algorithm?

    • “How does that sound?” (important, but insufficient)

    • “Aided Audiogram” (misleading, unreliable, attractive to lay-person)

      • Inadequate and inappropriate for making hearing aid adjustments

    • “First-Fit” (generally inadequate gain and output, generally greater insufficiency in the high frequencies, reducing Aided Intelligibility Index)

    • Manufacturer’s proprietary fitting algorithms

      • Where is the independent research validating?

    Validated prescriptive measures for adults yes
    Validated Prescriptive Measures for Adults? Yes! Proprietary Fitting Algorithm?

    • Desired Sensation Level

    • NAL-NL1/NAL-NL2

    • Ample and robust independent evidence

      • Not just for pediatric fittings

    • Assures maximal audibility

      • Within the limitations of the hearing aid circuit and transducers

    • Assures safe and comfortable OSPL

    • Can measure the effects of features

      • Directionality

      • Noise reduction

      • Amplitude Compression by frequency band

      • Frequency transposition/compression with high frequency inputs

    First fit vs verified fit to target
    First-Fit vs. Proprietary Fitting Algorithm?verified fit-to-target

    SII 75

    SII 80

    First fit vs verified fit to target1
    First-Fit vs. Proprietary Fitting Algorithm?verified fit-to-target

    SII 41

    SII 68

    Is this an ethics issue
    Is This an Ethics Issue? Proprietary Fitting Algorithm?

    • Yes!

    Is failure to assure audibility a major factor in user dissatisfaction with hearing aids
    Is Failure to Assure Audibility a Major Factor in User Dissatisfaction with Hearing Aids?

    • Yes!

    Challenges in hearing aid fitting in older adults
    Can Adequate, Appropriate and Repeated Counseling Improve on a Technically “Perfect” Hearing Aid Fitting?

    • Yes!

    Hearing aids make speech louder not make hearing better
    Hearing Aids Make Speech Louder, Not Make Hearing “Better”

    • Aided Audibility Index vs “Aided Audiogram”

    • Use of Estimated AAI in real-ear system as counseling tool

    • Aided vs unaided speech perception

    • Post-fitting hearing aid outcomes measures

      • APHAB

      • IOI-HA

    • Counsel, counsel, counsel

    Best practices methods mueller 2005
    Best-Practices Methods “Better”Mueller, 2005

    • 1. Conduct first-fit programming using a method that prescribes gain for

    • average input similar to that prescribed by the NAL-RP/NL1.

    • 2. Verify the fitting using real-ear aided response (REAR).

    • 3. Use an authentic speechlike signal (or real speech) at an input of 65 dB SPL.

    • 4. Adjust gain/compression parameters until a match to NAL target (or similar) within 2–3 dB has been obtained at all key frequencies.

    Sources of dissatisfaction with hearing aids
    Sources of Dissatisfaction with Hearing Aids “Better”

    • Comfort

      • Physical

      • Acoustic

        • Output SPL may be uncomfortably high

        • Audibility of speech spectrum may be inadequate

        • Occlusion effect

        • Feedback

    • Lack of speech clarity/poor speech perception

      • Related to auditory impairments not amenable to treatment with hearing aids

        • Frequency, temporal and amplitude distortion

  • Environmental Noise

    • Speech

      • A primary reason why older adults stop wearing hearing aids

    • Non-speech

  • What can we do
    What Can We Do? “Better”

    • First, fit the right hearing aids

      • Appropriate style and arrangement for hearing loss

      • Selection of features necessary; avoid unnecessary features

    • Second, program hearing aids to ensure maximal speech audibility, comfortable/safe OSPL

      • Ensure good feedback reduction without unnecessarily reducing high-frequency audibility

      • If gain/output reduced to accommodate initial acceptance

        • Ensure return to maximal audibility at a future appointment as acclimatization occurs

    Audiology value added counseling and rehabilitation
    Audiology Value-Added: Counseling and Rehabilitation “Better”

    • Hearing aids don’t do it all

      • We lose credibility and patient confidence if we declare otherwise

      • Need to clearly outline reasonable expectations

    • Educate patient/family that some component of hearing loss is/may be central/cognitive

      • We hear with our brains, not our ears

    • Importance of counseling, auditory rehabilitation

    • Additional steps patient/caregiver/spouse can take

      • Assistive devices

      • Regular follow-up appointments (hearing changes)

      • Patient/family counseling

      • Acclimatization

    • Referral to support group

    Counseling communication strategies
    Counseling – Communication Strategies “Better”

    • Important for patient and spouse/family alike

    • Receptive strategies: Environmental manipulation

      • Noise

      • Reverberation

      • Distance

  • Interactive strategies

    • Repeat/rephrase

    • Key words

    • Identify change in subject or topic

  • Use of “Clear Speech” by communication partner

    • This is trainable

  • At least familiarize patient/family with other hearing assistance technologies

    • Let them make the choice whether to take up

  • Assess patient s communication style
    Assess Patient’s Communication Style “Better”

    • Assertive

      • “own” the hearing loss

      • Take responsibility for successful communication

    • Aggressive: identify behaviors that are consistent with

      • External locus of control

      • “it’s your fault I can’t hear”

      • Control the conversation—never need to listen

    • Passive: identify behaviors that are consistent with

      • Bluff, “smile and nod”

      • Let others be the “ears”

      • Withdraw, deny problems

    • Counsel patient/family how to move to assertive communication

      • This may be quite difficult to change

    Acclimatization “Better”

    • Accommodation to new sensory stimuli

    • Effects are measureable and greater in high frequencies where more “new” information is provided to the brain via the ears

    • Evidence that this is a real phenomenon

      • Occurs over a period of time after amplification

      • Perceptual, physiological, neurophysiological and attitudinal

    • How to encourage patient to persevere?

      • Importance of counseling

      • Gradual increase in daily wear

      • “Train your brain”

      • Analogies—bifocals, new dental appliances etc.

    Acclimatization acoustic
    Acclimatization--Acoustic “Better”

    • Possible disappointment that things aren’t perfect

      • Unlike eyeglasses for myopia

    • Everything is “too loud”

    • Occlusion effect

    • Environmental noises

    • Low-level noise (e.g., air-conditioning)

    • Sounds that aren’t identifiable

      • Turn indicator in car

      • Refrigerator motor

    Acclimatization psychological
    Acclimatization-Psychological “Better”

    • “I’m old”

    • One more device to fumble with

      • Eyeglasses, dentures, cane, medications, wig, sensible shoes, wheelchair, compression stockings, adult diapers and now HEARING AIDS!

    • Pre-occupation with minimizing how visible hearing aids are

    • Physical Infirmities—frustration with

      • Seeing hearing aids

      • Manipulating controls (dexterity, fine-motor, peripheral neuropathy

    Since hearing aids can t do it all use of assistive technologies
    Since Hearing Aids Can’t Do It All…Use of Assistive Technologies

    • Improve

      • Noise

      • Reverberation

      • Distance

    • Bluetooth

    • FM

    • Amplified telephone, text, visual telephone (Skype, iChat)

    • Amplification and Captioning for TV

    • Signaling devices

      • Phone

      • Doorbell

    How to persuade use of assistive technologies
    How to Persuade Use of Assistive Technologies? Technologies

    • (Enlist the help of the child/grandchild in anything involving a computer)

    • Don’t assume patient “can’t afford”

    • Demonstrate devices connected to hearing aids, in real-world environments

      • Increases confidence in hearing aids

      • Overcomes obstacles that hearing aids along often cannot

    • Allow patient to experience hearing success via technology

      • Inform them of all options

      • Let them make the decision

    Adult cochlear implants
    Adult Cochlear Implants Technologies

    • Great improvements in QOL shown for CI in adults

    • Under-utilized technology

    • Audiologists may be too slow to refer

      • “try a better hearing aid”

      • Lack of knowledge of referral and implantation criteria

      • Don’t want to “lose” a HA patient

    Tinnitus searchfield et al 2010
    Tinnitus Technologies(Searchfield, et al., 2010)

    • Hearing aids may be effective treatment for tinnitus

      • ~50% of HI listeners with tinnitus had tinnitus relief

    • Tinnitus causes psycho-social handicap in some cases (high THQ scores)

    • Use of hearing aids can reduce psychosocial handicap and tinnitus-hearing handicap

      • Counseling alone ineffective

      • Counseling plus hearing aid use resulted in significant improvement

    Sustained benefit of hearing aids mulrow et al 1992
    “Sustained Benefit of Hearing Aids” (Mulrow, et al., 1992)

    • Elderly individuals with hearing loss

    • Assessed at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 months after hearing aid fitting.

    • All quality-of-life areas improved significantly from baseline to 4-month post-hearing aid fittings.

      • Social and emotional (HHIE)

      • Communication (QDS)

      • Depression (GDS) benefits

      • All were sustained at 8 and 12 months

      • Cognitive changes (SPMSQ) reverted to baseline at 12 months.

    • Hearing aids provide sustained benefits for at least a year in these elderly individuals

    Meta analysis treatment options for arhl patients
    Meta-Analysis: Treatment Options for ARHL Patients 1992)

    • 431 articles

    • Reported outcomes with hearing aids indicate they are an effective method for treating mild-moderate HL in cases where the patient is appropriately fitted and is willing, motivated, and able to use the device.

    • Very positive QoL and speech perception outcomes have been documented in treating severe-profound presbycusis with CIs. In some studies, QoL outcomes have even exceeded expectations of elderly patients.

    • Sprinzl & Riechelmann, 2010

    What can we do better
    What Can We Do Better? 1992)

    • Ensure maximal speech audibility

    • Find a revenue stream in addition to hearing aids

    • Spend as much time on…

      • Realistic expectations

      • Limitations of amplification

      • Communication strategies

      • …as on benefits of hearing aids, “new features”, “smaller size”, “cosmetically appealing”

    • Ensure that hearing assistance technologies other than hearing aids are also provided

    • Engage the patient in individual and/or group rehabilitation, or peer support group, or all to the extent that they are willing

    Provision of clinical services
    Provision of Clinical Services 1992)

    • Our services are underutilized

      • significant, negative, implications for communicative/QOL/cognitive outcomes

      • Impacting a large and growing population

    • We need to move the focus from “the device” to a program of

      • Identification – encouraging individuals to seek services

      • Accurate and thorough diagnosis

      • Comprehensive rehabilitation

        • Of which hearing aids are a necessary, but not sufficient, solution to the problem

    Need for rigorous evidence based research for decision making
    Need for Rigorous Evidence-Based Research for Decision-Making

    • Challenges

      • Hearing aid features are marketed prior to rigorous testing regarding efficacy

      • Claims may be made that actually don’t stand up to study

    • Lag between introduction of signal-processing schemes and validation research

    • Difficult to provide accurate information about the products offered

    • Responsibility to acknowledge such

    As a profession
    As a Profession… Decision-Making

    • Promote the concept that hearing aids work

      • And that rehabilitation, including hearing aids, is in an individual’s and family’s best interests

    • Provide hearing aid fittings based on best practices

      • That means real-ear verification to validated targets

    • Need to grow population of cultural/linguistic audiologists

    • Need to educate public/physicians/mental health workers about relationship of untreated hearing loss to mental and physical health impairments

    • Advocate for low-cost solutions for those who cannot afford hearing aids

      • While advocating for third-party reimbursement for hearing aids

    • Need to advocate for adequate and appropriate reimbursement for services

      • (sales of hearing aids cannot be our sole revenue stream!)