1 / 11

Computing Reachable Sets via Toolbox of Level Set Methods

Computing Reachable Sets via Toolbox of Level Set Methods. Michael Vitus (michael.vitus@gmail.com) Jerry Ding (jding@eecs.berkeley.edu) 4/16/2012. Toolbox of Level Set Methods. Ian Mitchell Professor at the University of British Columbia http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~mitchell/ Toolbox Matlab

Download Presentation

Computing Reachable Sets via Toolbox of Level Set Methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Computing Reachable Sets via Toolbox of Level Set Methods Michael Vitus (michael.vitus@gmail.com) Jerry Ding (jding@eecs.berkeley.edu) 4/16/2012

  2. Toolbox of Level Set Methods • Ian Mitchell • Professor at the University of British Columbia • http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~mitchell/ • Toolbox • Matlab • Computes the backwards reachable set • Fixed spacing Cartesian grid • Arbitrary dimension (computationally limited)

  3. Problem Formulation • Dynamics: • System input: • Disturbance input: • Target set: • Unsafe final conditions

  4. Backwards Reachable Set • Solution to a Hamilton-Jacobi PDE: where: • Terminal value HJ PDE • Converted to an initial value PDE by multiplying the H(x,p) by -1

  5. Toolbox Formulation • No automated method • Provide 3 items • Hamiltonian function (multiplied by -1) • An upper bound on the partials function • Final target set

  6. General Comments • Hamiltonian overestimated reachable set underestimated • Partials function • Most difficult • Underestimation  numerical instability • Overestimation rounded corners or worst case underestimation of reachable set • Computation • The solver grids the state space • Tractable only up to 6 continuous states • Toolbox • Coding: ~90% is setting up the environment

  7. Useful Dynamical Form • Nonlinear system, linear input • Input constraints are hyperrectangles • Analytical optimal inputs: • Partials upper bound:

  8. Example: Two Identical Vehicles yr Blunderer Evader • Kinematic Model • Position and heading angle • Inputs: turning rates • Target set • Protected zone

  9. Example • Optimal Hamiltonian: • Partials:

  10. Results

  11. Toolbox • Plotting utilities • Kernel\Helper\Visualization • visualizeLevelSet.m • spinAnimation.m • Initial condition helpers • Cylinders, hyperrectangles • Advice: Start small… • Walk through example

More Related