1 / 4

Terminologies in Education Teachers, Learners & Learning Resources Sarah Currier

Terminologies in Education Teachers, Learners & Learning Resources Sarah Currier CETIS Educational Content SIG Coordinator Centre for Academic Practice, University of Strathclyde JISC Terminologies Workshop, 13 February 2004, London. In e-Learning:

johnbowles
Download Presentation

Terminologies in Education Teachers, Learners & Learning Resources Sarah Currier

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Terminologies in Education Teachers, Learners & Learning Resources Sarah Currier CETIS Educational Content SIG Coordinator Centre for Academic Practice, University of Strathclyde JISC Terminologies Workshop, 13 February 2004, London

  2. In e-Learning: • Basic similarities- need for widely agreed subject vocabularies and classification schemes – BUT: • Requirement for more flexible updating, curriculum based vs. “pure” discipline based. (JORUM+ - DDC vs. LearnDirect) • Dublin Core (DC-Ed) vs. IEEE Learning Object Metadata • Disparate communities coming together now- needing agreement on approach to vocabularies for metadata elements. • IMS Digital Repositories Specification. • Developing their own specs for vocabularies now as well: IMS VDEX (Vocabularies Definition (for) Exchange) • Educationally specific vocabularies for attributes other than subject/discipline – each with its own difficulties. • See UK LOM Core, RLLOMAP. • Different levels of education requiring different levels of subject vocabulary.

  3. Cultural differences: expectation of user (learner and teacher) centred design, utilisation of teachers’ expertise, and increasingly, ideas about learner input • See Stor Curam Project – utilising card sort/cluster analysis methodology. • See SeSDL vs. RESULTS portal. • See DIDET project- teaching students information literacy with shared repository- problems with keyword indexing. • In e-learning there are a lot of learning resources – from learning objects to courses – require specialised kind of descriptions • Different types of storage and delivery – repositories, VLEs, etc. • Resistance to acknowledging the level of resourcing and expertise needed around metadata creation in general and vocabularies in particular • Not much expertise yet available for metadata creation or terminology management – although they are beginning to recognise the need for specialist input there are very few librarians/knowledge managers/info. scientists around with the right kind of expertise

  4. See: + CETIS Metadata & Digital Repositories SIG – 2 JISCmail lists- one for technical metadata issues, one for cataloguing issues. http://metadata.cetis.ac.uk/ + Research paper on metadata for elearning & quality- email me or look at above URL. + Stor Curam Repository Project: sarah.currier@strath.ac.uk

More Related