1 / 17

D&O and E&O - Is There Any Good News?

D&O and E&O - Is There Any Good News?. John Lewandowski, FCAS, MAAA CNA Insurance Company 2004 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Las Vegas - September 13, 2004. D&O POLICY CHARACTERISTICS. Coverage/Profile - What is D&O and E&O?.

johana
Download Presentation

D&O and E&O - Is There Any Good News?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. D&O and E&O - Is There Any Good News? John Lewandowski, FCAS, MAAACNA Insurance Company 2004 Casualty Loss Reserve SeminarLas Vegas - September 13, 2004

  2. D&O POLICY CHARACTERISTICS

  3. Coverage/Profile - What is D&O and E&O? Directors & Officers Liability Policy – provides coverage for claims arising from the “wrongful acts” – i.e., any act, error or omission -- of insured persons while serving in their capacity as directors or officers. Expanded to included Entity coverage for “securities claims.” D&O coverage is simply a specialized type of Errors & Omissions coverage. D&O’s have liability for misrepresentations and omissions • in a public offering registration statement filed with the SEC • in connection with any purchase or sale of securities Errors & Omissions Professional Liability Policy – provides coverage for claims involving alleged “errors and omissions” arising out of professional services rendered by the insured, e.g. banks, investment advisors, insurance companies, mutual funds… D&O coverage often includes Employment Practices Liability.

  4. Make-up of D&O Market Public cos. represent the largest share of the market Distribution of Insureds by Segment By Ownership Type For Profit by Account Size Small: Assets < $100M Mid: $100M < Assets < $1B Large: $1B < Assets < $10B Very Large: Assets >10B

  5. Typical (Large Public Co.) D&O Program Structure • Program size typically excess of $50 million, up to $200 million+ • Limits offered range from $5 million to $25 million per carrier, many carriers on any one program • Retentions range from $100K and up! • Pricing varies widely from account to account, typically based upon : • Sector/industry group • Size –Market Capitalization, Assets • Recent activities – IPO, M&A • Financial Condition – consistent performance • Financial Rating • Corporate Governance – management quality, board independence

  6. Some Past Drivers of D&O results (1997-2002) Increasing Coverage/Reducing Premium Expanded capacity/larger limits offered Expanded coverage, entity coverage eliminated pre-set allocation Free/automatic Reinstatements Multi-Year contracts, with significant discounts and no re-underwriting Increasing Claim Costs – Frequency and Severity 2001 – IPO Allocation filings 2002 – Filings against Analyst and Investment Banks; Wave of Corporate Meltdowns Begins – Enron, MCI Worldcom, Tyco, Global Crossing 2003 - Mutual Funds – Late Trading/Market timing M&A Activity – Banking, Insurance Deteriorating Investment Market

  7. Historical Avg. Policy Limits - Public Co. D&O Limits in Thousands

  8. Current State of the D&O market • Through Year-End 2003 • Market saw reduced capacity (limits), increased retentions • More players on each program, pricing less competitive • Large rate increases - more than 150% were common • Coverage restrictions – eliminate investment banking, entity coverage • Elimination of multi-year deals • 2003/2002 Securities Class Action Lawsuits Decline by 22% • 2003/2002 Market Capitalization Losses Decline by 72% • And Beyond….. • Once again, swift changes in the market in 2004……….

  9. D&O CLAIM CHARACTERISTICS

  10. Historical Legislation Impacting D&O Suits 1933/34 Securities Acts D&O Liability for misrepresentations, omissions in public offerings, statements 1995 PSLRA Intended to prevent abuses of securities class action lawsuits. Heightened Pleading Standard 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act Blackout trading barred CEO and CFO certifications. Faster insider trading disclosure Increased Audit Committee duties. Increased SEC review More criminal penalties and fines

  11. D&O Securities Suits (Through August 2004) Source : Stanford Research

  12. D&O Claims Characteristics Some interesting Public Company D&O statistics*…. • Half of all suits against D&O’s are filed by Shareholders • 24% of claims brought by employees • 36% of all claims are class actions • Low Frequency - average of 225 securities suits per year (excl IPO) • High Severity – average settlement of $20 million • Most active District Court is S.D. New York • Most frequently sued Sector is Technology • Most frequently sued Industry is Biotechnology & Drugs • Most resolutions achieved through settlement, not judgment *Source : Tillinghast D&O Report and Stanford Research

  13. Significant D&O Claims

  14. Major Factors For D&O Claims • Scope of Policy – is it a claim, a wrongful act? • Ground-up Nature of the Claim • Possible Defenses – exclusions, warrants, application. • Policy structure, coverage and wording

  15. Criteria Used to Establish D&O Claim Potential • Alleged Damages - “Plaintiff-style” damages • Length of Class Period – number of shareholders • Insider Holdings • Historical Stock Performance • Underlying carriers – who is lead on Claim? • Venue – circuit, pleading standards, judge • Attorney firms – both Plaintiff and Defendant • Industry – Telecomm., Pharm., Energy – any trends? • Procedural steps – Consolidated complaint, motion to dismiss • Lead Plaintiff - Institutional Investor • Insured’s stamina/motivation

  16. Key Takeaways • Principal exposure is from Shareholders Class actions against Public Companies, Private Company litigation less common. • Pricing for D&O must recognize Size and Sectors as important factors, but not sole factors – all are not equal. • Last few years witnessed emergence of non-traditional claims (mega-torts) in addition to traditional issuer fraud cases. • Settlements are not keeping pace with filings, there is a large backlog of cases.

  17. Is There Any Good News? • Lessons Learned from the past…….. • Keeping pace with the next possible mega-tort by identifying industries/markets in distress is critical. • Reserving for D&O is multi-faceted and requires a continuous evaluation during the lifetime of the claim. • Strong working relationship between Claims, Underwriting and Actuarial is important since traditional actuarial reserving methods do not work.

More Related