1 / 19

The Impacts of Alternative Farm Bill Design on U.S. Agriculture

The Impacts of Alternative Farm Bill Design on U.S. Agriculture. Keith Coble and Barry Barnett. Given high prices- wheres the money. Domestic Policy and Trade. Tension between WTO commitments and producer group desires for domestic policies

joanna
Download Presentation

The Impacts of Alternative Farm Bill Design on U.S. Agriculture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Impacts of Alternative Farm Bill Design on U.S. Agriculture Keith Coble and Barry Barnett

  2. Given high prices- wheres the money

  3. Domestic Policy and Trade • Tension between WTO commitments and producer group desires for domestic policies • What’s really new in the 2007 debate – revenue designs • Sought most by Midwestern corn growers • Little enthusiasm from others

  4. Revenue Variability

  5. Price-Yield Correlation

  6. Revenue Designs • As proposed, not really more WTO-compliant • What do they do to aggregate outlays? • What do they do to producer risk reduction? • Can the same level of safety net be achieved for a lower government cost?

  7. Spatial Aggregation National State County Across commodities Permanent disaster bill Commodity-specific Net Integration with other programs Crop insurance wraps LDP replacement Target revenue Legislatively-determined Market-based Variations on the Revenue Theme

  8. Options Examined • Continuation of Current Policy • House Bill with Price Counter-Cyclical • House Bill with Nation Revenue Counter-Cyclical • Senate ACR as Passed from Committee • Senate ACR with a Crop Insurance Wrap • Senate Producer’s Choice between Current Programs and ACR

  9. Our Analysis • Results simulate representative corn, cotton, wheat, and soybean revenue from each of hundreds of counties • Models incorporate price and yield risk, and includes county and other aggregate stochastic variables • Importantly, the system provides a forecast of program payments into the future (like FAPRI, A&M, and CBO) • Models allow estimates of the risk reduction and government payouts under alternative designs if implemented for 2008-2012

  10. Model Design • Market-year average prices from NASS, 1974-2005 • Relative price changes are computed • County, state, and national yields from NASS, 1975-2005 • Yields detrended • Representative farm-level yield variability obtained by: where

  11. Model Design • Starting price = September 2007 futures market prices for 2008 delivery months • The national marketing year average (MYA) price in year t is obtained by taking the expected price in year t-1 and multiplying it by the historical price change associated with the random draw on national yield.

  12. Methods: Revenue Simulation 5 years * 500 iterations = 2500 random draws PSt PSn+1 Yft Yfn+1 PSt+1 Yft+1 × PSnt+25 Yfnt+25 PSt+25 Yft+25

  13. Methods: Random Draw Ycn+1 YSt YSn+1 Yft Yfn+1 Yct YNt PRt PRn+1 Ct Cn+1 Yct+1 YNt+1 Yft+1 PRt+1 YSt+1 Ct+1 Yfnt+25 Yct+25 Yft+25 PRt+25 Ycnt+25 YNt+25 Ct+25 YSt+25

  14. Aggregate 5-year average per acre payments

  15. Corn

  16. Corn

  17. The Effect of Wrapping Insurance Around Revenue Programs

  18. Distribution of 2010 Government Payments

  19. Final Thoughts • Is there really a desire for risk efficient policy?

More Related