1 / 16

802.11 January 2016 WG Motions

802.11 January 2016 WG Motions. Authors:. Date: 2016-01-21. Abstract. This document is a composite of all 802.11 sub-group motions that are brought to the January 2016 802.11 WG plenary meetings. Revisions R0: at conclusion of Wednesday WG11 plenary

jnation
Download Presentation

802.11 January 2016 WG Motions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 802.11 January 2016 WG Motions Authors: Date:2016-01-21 Dorothy Stanley (HPE)

  2. Abstract • This document is a composite of all 802.11 sub-group motions that are brought to the January 2016 802.11 WG plenary meetings. • Revisions • R0: at conclusion of Wednesday WG11 plenary • R1: containing motions for Friday WG11 plenary • R2: at conclusion of Friday WG11 plenary Dorothy Stanley (HPE)

  3. Wednesday Dorothy Stanley (HPE)

  4. Straw Poll: What is the preferred Style of IMT-2020 Participation • 802.11 directly participates (through IEEE-SA sector membership) in the IMT-2020 process • 802.11 actively supports an 802 EC standing committee that is participating in the IMT-2020 process • 802.11 provides requested information to an 802 EC standing committee that is participating in the IMT-2020 process • 802.11 should not participate in the IMT-2020 process • Need more information Straw Poll: Which level of 802.11 participation do you prefer? 1) 15 2) 48 3) 29 4) 21 5) 43 Dorothy Stanley (HPE)

  5. Friday Dorothy Stanley (HPE)

  6. Teleconferences Motion to approve: Moved:, Seconded: Result: Dorothy Stanley (HPE)

  7. TGak Recirculation WG Letter Ballot • Motion: Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB212 on P802.11ak Draft_D1.0 as contained in document 11-15/0556r19, • Instruct the editor to prepare Draft D2.0 incorporating these resolutions and, • Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should TGak Draft_D2.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?” • Moved by Donald Eastlake on behalf of TGak • Result: • TG vote: Moved: Michael Fischer, Seconded: Ganesh Venkatesan, Result: 4-0-0 Dorothy Stanley (HPE)

  8. IEEE 802 liaison to ITU-R WP5D on IMT-2020 interest Motion: • Based on interest expressed during the IEEE 802.11 WNG meeting on 19 January 2016 in the IMT-2020 activity, IEEE 802.11 WG recommends to IEEE 802 EC that a liaison be sent to ITU-R WP5D indicating that IEEE 802 is interested in participating in the IMT-2020 process. • Moved: Andrew Myles • Seconded: Joseph Levy • Result: Dorothy Stanley (HPE)

  9. Straw Poll: Possible Benefits to 802.11 from IMT-2020 Participation • Access to additional spectrum allocated for 5G use • Particularly in countries that focus on ITU-R allocations • Note 5G spectrum is anticipated to be both Licenced and Un-Licensed • Straw Poll: Is obtaining access to 5G spectrum important to 802.11? • Critically important • Nice to have • Not important • Better insight into what is required for 5G, which may impact our work on IEEE 802.11ax, 802.11ah and other existing/new work • Including IoT, wireless broadband and “mission Critical” • Straw Poll: Is understanding 5G important to 802.11? • Critically important • Nice to have • Not important Dorothy Stanley (HPE)

  10. Straw Poll: Possible Benefits to 802.11 of IMT-2020 Participation (cont.) • Ensuring that the 5G requirements reflect realistic use cases based on the 802.11 industry knowledge and market experiences. • Straw Poll: Is ensuring realistic 5G requirements important to 802.11? • Critically important • Nice to have • Not important • Ensure 802.11 performance is not evaluated by requirements set by “others” that do not allow for fair comparison between 802.11 and other technologies. • e.g. LAA, LTE-U, MuLTEfire • Straw Poll: Is it important to insure a fair requirements? • Critically important • Nice to have • Not important Dorothy Stanley (HPE)

  11. Straw Poll: Possible Benefits to 802.11 of IMT-2020 Participation (cont.) • Inclusion of 802.11 in the world-wide 5G marketing hype • All publicity is good publicity  • Straw Poll: Is 802.11 just being a 5G Technology is important? • Critically important • Nice to have • Not important • IMT-2020 will provide alternative technologies to key 802.11 use cases/markets – Inclusion of 802.11 as IMT-2020 technology ensures 802.11 is on a level field for these use cases/markets. • Hot Spot, IoT, Indoor deployments, … • Straw Poll: Is ensuring 802.11 is an IMT-2020 technology that can be fairly compared with other IMT-2020 technologies important? • Critically important • Nice to have • Not important Dorothy Stanley (HPE)

  12. Straw poll • Do you approve of the leadership summit • Yes • No • Abstain Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  13. Straw poll • Is advance working group review of the tentative agenda for the leadership summit needed? • Yes • No • Abstain Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  14. Friday – EC Motionsplenary only Dorothy Stanley (HPE)

  15. EC items Dorothy Stanley (HPE)

  16. References Dorothy Stanley (HPE)

More Related