Cluster Meeting in Severodonetsk on April 20, 2017

1. Cluster Meeting Severodonetsk 20 April, 2017 Contact:info.Ukraine@fscluster.org

2. Agenda • Follow Up Action Points / Minutes • Partner Activity Update • Thematic Assessment on Livelihoods – Final Findings (REACH) • Update on Agricultural Assistance (FAO) • AOB • SPHERE Training update • Country Cluster Performance Monitoring (CCPM) 2017 • Food Security Assessment • Livelihoods Update (LWG and definitions)

3. Approval of Minutes & Follow Up Action Points • Approval of Minutes

4. Partner Activity Update FSC objective 1Access to food

5. Food Security Analysis - Update

6. March 2017 Access to Food interventions

7. Partner Activity Update

8. Partner Activity Update

9. Please note, the map only reflects the interventions of those organisations that reports to the FSLC. Partner Activity Update

10. The current gap analysis map includes only inputs from those partners who have shared data to date on the raion level by the 19 April 2017. Further inputs are expected in the coming month, including from WFP and other cluster partners. An updated map will be shared at this point. Please note, the map only reflects the interventions of those organisations that reports to the FSLC. Partner Activity Update For project planning and targeting, please contact info.Ukraine@fscluster.org for further details

11. FSC objective 2Agricultural inputs January - March

12. FSC objective 2Agricultural inputs Plans

13. FSC objective 2Agricultural input - Plans

14. FSC objective 2Agricultural inputs Plans

15. FSC objective 3Livelihood Assets

16. Partner Activity Update

17. Partner Activity Update

18. Partner Activity Update

19. Questions?

20. Agenda • Follow Up Action Points / Minutes • Partner Activity Update and Update of IM tools (FSLC) • Thematic Assessment on Livelihoods – Final Findings (REACH) • Update on Agricultural Assistance (FAO) • AOB • SPHERE Training update • Country Cluster Performance Monitoring (CCPM) 2017 • Food Security Assessment • Livelihoods Update (LWG and definitions)

21. REACH Thematic Assessment Final Findings Kramatorsk, 19 April 2017 V 1.0

22. Contents • Background • SDR • Sampling • Findings • Conclusions

23. Background

24. Why this assessment? • Multiple assessments on humanitarian crisis • Assumption that livelihood situation deteriorates as we move towards the contact line • Transition from humanitarian to early recovery and development programmes • Multiple studies but no assessment comparing perspectives of employers and active population • REACH agreed with the major humanitarian partners to conduct an assessment on livelihoods in the 5 eastern oblasts of Ukraine

25. General Objective • To inform interventions on livelihood programming to support the needs of local enterprises and the working age population of Luhansk, Donetsk, Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk, and ZaporizhiaOblasts.

26. Timeline of Assessment

27. SDR

28. Secondary Data Consulted • 40 sources from more than 30 organisations • Sample of SDR sources

29. Sampling

30. Target Population

31. Data Collection Lack of information on vulnerability of conflict affected population

32. Working Age Population Sampling Lack of information on vulnerability of conflict affected population

33. Findings – Context Analysis

34. Key Findings – GDP per Capita 8% drop in GDP per capita based on purchasing power parity (PPP)

35. Key Findings – Investment Large drop in FDI to Ukraine with slight recovery

36. Key Findings – Top Employers Industry is the first employer in the five eastern oblasts

37. Key Findings – Top Employers Donetsk and Luhansk much more industrial

38. Key Findings – Wage Disparities Significant differences in regional average wages with Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk above average and three others below

39. Key Findings – Enterprise Size Higher reliance on big enterprises in the east: 63% of wages paid by big enterprises in Donetsk

40. Key Findings – Rural – Urban Divide

41. Key Findings – Internal Migration Donetsk and Luhansk experiencing pre-conflict net-outflows compounded by crisis

42. Key Findings – Displacement Higher concentration of IDPs in Donetsk and Luhansk from primary data collection Kharkiv more than 3% IDPs Numbers in line with MoSP data

43. Findings – Impact on Businesses

44. Key Findings – Loss of Trade Significant losses in trade mostly to CIS but also to EU: conflict affecting supply chains and markets

45. Key Findings – Loss of Trade Kharkiv, Donetsk and Luhansk highly impacted by changes in trade policy

46. Key Findings – Decrease in Profits 90% of respondents reported a decrease of 20% or more in profits

47. Key Findings – Reasons Damaged infrastructure and disruption to supply chains less pronounced in Dnipro and Zaporizhia

48. Key Findings – Changes in Labour Almost1 in 6 had to decrease staff numbers

49. Key Findings – Barriers to Recruitment Lack of relevant skills and experience identified as a barrier to recruitment

50. Key Findings – Jobs in Short Supply Different needs for different economies: Donetsk has shortages of miners and Luhansk of machine operators