1 / 13

Campus Grids Working Meeting Report

This report provides an overview of the Campus Grids Working Meeting, where technical experts from various institutions gathered to exchange information, compare implementations, and identify best practices in campus grids. The meeting discussed potential benefits, challenges, and opportunities in implementing campus grids, with a focus on global file systems, seamless user environments, virtual machines, and cloud technology. The report also highlights the importance of campus grids in achieving more efficient usage of machines, leveraging local investments, testing new grid technologies, and bridging science and technology. Additionally, it examines the role of the Open Science Grid and the incentives for campus grid integration. The report concludes with future prospects and challenges for campus grids and the need for collaboration, sharing of expertise, and improved usability.

jharley
Download Presentation

Campus Grids Working Meeting Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Campus Grids Working Meeting Report Rob Gardner University of Chicago OSG All Hands March 10, 2010

  2. Campus Grids Working Meeting • In January a small meeting of technical experts with experience in CG to exchange information, compare implementations, and identify best practices • Meeting prompted by discussions during OSG staff retreat in Madison July 09 • Invited experts from GLOW, Purdue, FermiGrid, ClemsonGrid, NYS-grid, UCal • Others with CG interest – Nebraska, UChicago • Potential role for vm and Cloud in CG – LBNL

  3. Participants • Brian Bockelman (Nebraska) • Dan Bradley (Wisconsin) • Keith Chadwick (Fermilab) • Steve Gallo (Buffalo) • Sebastien Goasguen (Clemson) • Rob Gardner (Chicago) • Sam Hoover (Clemson) • John McGee (RENCI) • Doug Olson (LBNL) • Preston Smith (Purdue) • Ben Cotton (Purdue) • Prakashan Korambath (UCLA)

  4. Campus Grids in the CI Landscape – Ed Seidel, Feb 2009 ? Recall Feb 09 OSG AH (Livingston/LIGO) OSG

  5. Themes Guiding Discussion • Global file systems and storage systems • Seamless user environments • Role and use of virtual machines and cloud • Implementation challenges • resulting from provincial campus issues, local constraints and priorities

  6. Identified CG Potential Benefits • Achieve more efficient usage of machines • Purdue and GLOW find more efficient usage • Dean’s perspective: efficiency in support • Participation in a national community • Help leverage local investments • Science and technical bridging • Testing ground for new Grid technologies • If something has wild success at a campus, it might be a breakthrough for OSG as well • And vice-versa

  7. Identified CG Potential Benefits • Encourage more efficient and professional system administration • Visibility of resource and early fault detector • Less downtime, less manual configuration, better use of the resources • Benefit from collective buying power and decision making • Examples where this has been very beneficial have been reported by FermiGrid, Purdue, Clemson and GLOW.

  8. Identified CG Potential Benefits • Having local CG experts in high throughput computing a plus • Helping scientists get started • An individual research group may not have the continuity of funds and demand for computing to support such people • Making the case for such support at the campus level has succeeded in Nebraska, Purdue, GLOW, Clemson

  9. But there are significant questions • What role can or should OSG play? • What incentives for CG & CG-CI? • To join resources across a campus • To hook into a national CI, eg. OSG • Faculty, departmental computing, campus IT • Financial arguments for Deans, CIO? • Towards working sharing environments • What missing pieces could OSG provide to catalyze sharing resources

  10. Questions, cont. • How can potential joiners to a CG readily realize and monitor the potential benefit to their organizations? • What principles and/or architecture is needed to catalyze sharing or exchange within and across campus grids? • CG: Users, research groups, departments • Grid: VOs, Gateways, etc • How best to evaluate and adapt emerging technologies to CG (vm,cloud,next buzz)

  11. CG and OSG • Making cross-organizational collaborations practical • (sharing data and compute power, authenticating users and access priorities) • Bootstrapping campus grid activity in cases where connection to OSG happens first • Sharing expertise, best practices, Grid software stacks, documentation and training modules • Applying OSG bylaws & principles to CG

  12. Key CG Futures • Campus-wide distributed systems management tools & services • Configuration management and monitoring • Policy compliance monitoring / audit • “Customer relations” management .. trust management • Grid-wide sharing/trading infrastructure • Resource exchange & clearing house • Communication if nothing else • Incentives for sharing & trading • Usability – lower all barriers to (guaranteed) success (cycles and storage) for users

  13. Conclusions and Outlook • Ideally we’d like to provide best practice guidance to sites in wishing to connect more resources into OSG – long term • Will require much more work, evaluation, development • We identified some important challenges and barriers as seen from the campus • Some of these we believe may be opportunities that future-OSG • It has to be attractive • Full report • https://twiki.grid.iu.edu/twiki/pub/CampusGrids/WorkingMeetingFermilab/

More Related