1 / 16

IGES-TERI efforts to promote LCT deployment in India

IGES-TERI's efforts to promote the deployment of low-carbon technologies in India and the need for a matching platform. Activities include stakeholders matching, feasibility studies, and capacity building.

jhare
Download Presentation

IGES-TERI efforts to promote LCT deployment in India

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Widening Japan-India Environmental Technology Gateway • IGES-TERI efforts to promote LCT deployment in India • -Special emphasis on initiating Japan-India Technology Matchmaking platform (JITMAP) • -Crown Plaza, Pune, 27 Sep. 2017- Abdessalem RABHI, PhD. ProgrammeManager, IGES

  2. Content About IGES: Quick outline Background on IGES-TERI efforts to promote LCT deployment in India Key findings: Why we need JITMAP? How it works: Activities Way forwards (FY2017)

  3. IGES headquarters (Hayama, Kanagawa) 1) About IGES: Quick outline • Name of the Institute The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) • EstablishmentMarch 31, 1998 • Location >Headquarter: Hayama, Miura-gun, Kanagawa >Tokyo Office: Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo >Kitakyushu Office: Kitakyushu-city, Fukuoka >Kansai Research Centre (KRC): Kobe, Hyogo >Overseas Offices/Desks: India, Indonesia, Thailandand China. 3 Kansai Research Center Date: July 7th ,2010

  4. 2. Background on IGES-TERI efforts to promote LCT Efforts on B2B matching: FS studies FS on Gas Heat Pump (GHP) FS on Electric Heat Pump (EHP) FS on Compressed Air system (CA) FS on Steam System Optimization (SSO) FS on Once Through Boiler (OTB) FS on Induction Furnace (If)

  5. 2. Background on IGES-TERI efforts to promote LCT • Efforts on B2B matching: Demonstration projects • Electric Heat Pump (EHP): 30%-40% energy saving • Gas Heat Pump (GHP): 35%-45% energy saving

  6. 2. Background on IGES-TERI efforts to promote LCT Efforts on B2B matching: Capacity building On site trainings for plant engineers In house trainings for energy auditors (TOT) Awareness creation and capacity buildings for businesses managers and/or owners

  7. 2. Background on IGES-TERI efforts to promote LCT Efforts on B2F matching Mtg. with Small Industries development bank in India (SIDBI) Mtg. with JBIC (India) Mtg. with JICA (India)

  8. 2. Background on IGES-TERI efforts to promote LCT • Efforts on B2Pmatching e.g. Mtg. with Central Boiler Inspectors regarding IBR e.g. mtg. with Maharashtra Energy Development Agency (MEDA) e.g. Mtg. with Gujarat Energy Development Agency (GEDA)

  9. 3. Key findings: Why we need JITMAP? • Opportunities: • Huge potential market for Japanese technologies deployment in India: • Japan-India tie is strengthening in recent year; • Leapfrog technologies are now required, and the upfront cost is gradually not being considered as the main obstacle due to Indian growing economy; • Numerous stimulating policies and financing programmes are available in Japan and India. • (See JITMAP website: http://jitmap.org (PW asdf1234)

  10. 3. Key findings: Why we need JITMAP? • Challenges: • Significant information/knowledge gap exists; • (technologies, best practices (BOP), financing options, policies/regulations, etc.) • Incomplete, fragmented, and uncoordinated efforts to tap opportunities; • (JICA, JETRO, JBIC, ECCJ, NEDO, UNIDO, ICETT, etc.) • High upfront cost of Japanese technologies; • Longer time (compared to competitor) toward finalizing business deal; • Difficult communication/marketing(language, mind set, terminology, etc.) • >> There is a need to initiate a stakeholders' matchmaking platform to address the above challenges in practical and systematic manner.

  11. 4. How it works: Activities • JITMAP was initiated/launched as a trial basis on Jul. 13th, 2016. IGES and TERI as core members. • Leading Indian organizations has joined as dialogues members, namely: GEDA, MEDA, MCCIA, GITCO. Others are also expressing interests, from India and Japan.

  12. 4. How it works: Activities

  13. Mapping for matching Information collection, management and assessment =>Develop database on “Seeds” and “Needs” (technologies, stimulating policies & regulations, stimulating financing schemes, etc.) 4. How it works: Activities IGES and TERI, in coordination with JITMAP Dialogue Members, enable matchmaking of B2B, B2F and B2P through the following activities: Stakeholders matching (B2B, B2F and B2P) Feasibility studies, project proposals, bankable proposals, project implementation, follow-up activities, etc Stakeholders’ awareness creation and capacity building Technical and financial assistances, Workshops, Trainings, joint planning for replication at wider level, etc. “On the ground” matchmaking - JITMAP members dialogue meetings - Experts consultation meetings “Online” Information and knowledge sharing “Online” Information and knowledge sharing through JITMAP website http://jitmap.org “Outputs Databases, directories,case studies, proposals (projects/strategies/roadmaps), training materials, etc.

  14. Key feature of the platform • Practical: unique forum where matching B2B, B2F and B2P can occur on the ground as well as online. • Comprehensive: Information and knowledge sharing is about various aspects (technologies data base, policy data base, financing data base, etc. not just about one of them as in the case of existing platforms. • Systematic: It addresses all the stages of LCTT, with special focus given to follow up activities. • Ultimate goal is to materialize the opportunities rather than just identifying them. • Develop the information rather than just collecting it. • Technology/BOP categorization to craft the need for intervention. • It is not an alternative option to existing platforms, but rather a complementary one to them.

  15. 5. Way forwards (FY2017) • Continue the collection, management and assessment of available information; • B2B matching through feasibility studies; • B2F matching (if deemed necessary); • B2P matching (if deemed necessary); • Awareness creation and capacity building (Dissemination Workshop, Training workshop); • Launch JITMAP website; • Identify and include new dialogue members in JITMAP (from Japan and India); • Explore the replication of JITMAP to other country in Asia, such as Thailand.

  16. Thank you for your attention

More Related