1 / 23

CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE

CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE. Prof. Janicke 2015. THOUGHT TO BE WEAKER. RULES DRAFTERS (AND COMMON LAW) DEVELOPED A SET OF HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT COULD BE USED ONLY WHEN THE DECLARANT IS UNAVAILABLE AT TRIAL

jgodbout
Download Presentation

CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2015

  2. THOUGHT TO BE WEAKER • RULES DRAFTERS (AND COMMON LAW) DEVELOPED A SET OF HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT COULD BE USED ONLY WHEN THE DECLARANT IS UNAVAILABLE AT TRIAL • A COMPROMISE BETWEEN OUTRIGHT EXCLUSION AND OUTRIGHT ADMISSIBILITY Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  3. MEANING OF “UNAVAILABLE” • WITHOUT ANY CONNIVANCE BY PROPONENT, DECLARANT IS: • NOT FINDABLE • REFUSES TO ATTEND • REFUSES TO ANSWER EVEN WHEN DIRECTED BY COURT • HAS A LOSS OF MEMORY • IS DEAD • IS INCAPACITATED MENTALLY OR PHYSICALLY Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  4. PROBLEMS/CASES • BARBER • 4-O Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  5. FORMER TESTIMONY • AT A HEARING OR DEPOSITION IN THIS OR ANOTHER CASE • NOW-OPPONENT MUST HAVE HAD OPPORTUNITY AND MOTIVE TO CROSS-EXAMINE • DIRECTLY, or • THROUGH A PARTY WITH SIMILAR INTEREST (CIVIL CASES ONLY) Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  6. SOME THINGS THAT WON’T QUALIFY • AFFIDAVITS [NOT A HEARING OR DEPOSITION; NO CHANCE TO CROSS-EXAMINE] • GRAND JURY TESTIMONY [NO CHANCE TO CROSS-EXAMINE] Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  7. SOME THINGS THAT WILL QUALIFY • NON-PARTY TESTIMONY AT EARLIER TRIAL OF THIS CASE • NON-PARTY TESTIMONY AT A DEPOSITION IN THIS OR ANOTHER CASE (WHERE OPPONENT WAS PARTY) • NON-PARTY TESTIMONY AT A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING IN THIS CASE Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  8. NOTE – AN OPPOSING PARTY’S TESTIMONY DOESN’T NEED THIS EXCEPTION • IF OFFERED BY THE ADVERSE PARTY, CAN BE OFFERED FREELY, REGARDLESS OF PRIOR OATH OR CROSS-EXAM OPPORTUNITY Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  9. DYING DECLARATIONS • SUPPOSED BASIS: NO ONE WOULD FALSIFY WHILE SOON TO MEET HIS MAKER • REQUIREMENTS: • HOMICIDE OR CIVIL CASE • DECLARANT THOUGHT HE WAS DYING IMMINENTLY (NOT “GOING TO BE SHOT” SOME VAGUE FUTURE TIME) • STATEMENT WAS RE. CAUSE OF THE IMPENDING DEATH (i.e., WHODUNIT) Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  10. EXAMPLES(GIVEN THE PROPER FOUNDATION FACTS) • IN A HOMICIDE CASE: “JACK DID IT!!” • IN A WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION: “BOB SHOT ME IN SELF-DEFENSE” • IN A WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION: “I NEVER SHOULD HAVE EATEN THOSE OYSTERS” Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  11. THIRD-PARTY STATEMENTS OF GUILT/FAULT • STATEMENT THAT WAS AGAINST DECLARANT’S INTEREST • PECUNIARY • PENAL • MADE BY A NON-PARTY • MOST ARE OFFERED BY DEFENDANTS, CIVIL AND CRIMINAL, THROUGH WITNESSES • TO DEFLECT BLAME Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  12. EXAMPLES OF NON-PARTY CONCESSIONS OFFERED BY D, THROUGH WITNESSES: • TESTIMONY: “NONPARTY X SAID TO ME: ‘OUR TECHNICIAN WIRED IT WRONG’” • NONPARTY X Co.’s DOCUMENT RECALLING X’S AUTOS FOR DEFECTIVE FUEL LINES • TESTIMONY: “NONPARTY X SAID: ‘SORRY WE BLEW UP YOUR HOUSE’” Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  13. RESTRICTION ON NON-PARTY CONCESSIONS • WHEN OFFERED TO EXCULPATE A CRIMINAL ACCUSED: • MUST HAVE CORROBORATING CIRCUMSTANCES THAT “CLEARLY INDICATE ITS TRUSTWORTHINESS” • MOST CASES HOLD THEM INADMISSIBLE!! • BASED ON A GENERAL MISTRUST OF THE CRIMINAL COMMUNITY Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  14. PROBLEMS/CASES • 4P Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  15. OUT-OF-COURT STATEMENT RE. FAMILY HISTORY • EXAMPLE: TESTIMONY THAT “MY MOTHER TOLD ME I WAS HARRY’S SON” • EXAMPLE: TESTIMONY THAT “HER FATHER TOLD ME JEAN WAS BORN IN THE NAVAL HOSPITAL AT NEWPORT” • NOTE: RECALL THAT DECLARANT (MOTHER, FATHER) MUST BE UNAVAILABLE Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  16. DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO HAVE SINCE BEEN “RUBBED OUT” • IF THE REMOVER IS A PARTY, THESE ARE NOW ADMISSIBLE AGAINSTHIM • EXAMPLES: • EARLIER 3rd PARTY’S AFFIDAVIT • EARLIER 3rd PARTY’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY • EARLIER 3rd PARTY’S ORAL REMARK • EARLIER 3rd PARTY LETTER Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  17. ADMISSIBLE HEARSAY DECLARANTS ARE IMPEACHABLE • THEY ARE TREATED JUST LIKE WITNESSES • TO PREVENT ABUSIVE USE OF EXCEPTIONS • SAME RULES OF IMPEACHMENT Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  18. THE “CATCHALL”: RULE 807 • FOR THE “ALMOST” SITUATIONS • FOR THE UNPREPARED LAWYER WHO DOESN’T KNOW HOW TO OVERCOME A SUSTAINED HEARSAY OBJECTION • FOR THE JUDGE WHO WANTS TO BE BULLETPROOF ON APPEAL Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  19. REQUIREMENTS: • EVIDENCE OF A “MATERIAL FACT” • ??? • MORE PROBATIVE THAN ANYTHING ELSE REASONABLY AVAILABLE • A HAVEN FOR THE UNPREPARED • IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE • ADVANCE NOTICE REQUIRED Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  20. COURT EFFECTIVELY REWRITES THE HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS • USUALLY SEEN IN CIVIL CASES • [THE BANE OF MY EXISTENCE; THE JUDGE USUALLY SMILES] Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  21. PROBLEMS/CASES • Weaver Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  22. A PROBLEM WITH SIXTH AMENDMENT CONFRONTATION CLAUSE, WHEN HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS ARE USED BY PROSECUTORS • CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON • “TESTIMONIAL” TYPE HEARSAY MUST BE KEPT OUT OF CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS, DESPITE RULES 803, 804 Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

  23. PROBLEMS/CASES • Crawford • Davis Hearsay Exceptions -- Declarant Unavailable

More Related