Verifying open ear fittings with speech mapping
Download
1 / 40

Verifying Open-Ear Fittings With Speech-Mapping - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 125 Views
  • Uploaded on

Verifying Open-Ear Fittings With Speech-Mapping. AAA CEU Theater Program. David J. Smriga, M.A. Audiologist Hearing Industry Consultant. Strom, Karl, “Rapid Product Changes Mark The New Mature Digital Market” Hearing Review Vol. 13, No. 5, 2006 p.p.70-75. BTE Growth Spurt.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Verifying Open-Ear Fittings With Speech-Mapping' - jetta


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Verifying open ear fittings with speech mapping

Verifying Open-Ear Fittings With Speech-Mapping

AAA CEU Theater Program

David J. Smriga, M.A.

Audiologist

Hearing Industry Consultant


Strom, Karl, “Rapid Product Changes Mark The New Mature Digital Market” Hearing Review

Vol. 13, No. 5, 2006 p.p.70-75


Bte growth spurt
BTE Growth Spurt Digital Market” Hearing Review

  • After 20% or less of the market in the ’80’s and ’90’s, look at BTE’s now:

    • 26.4% in 2004

    • 32.6% in 2005

    • 42.00 in first half of 2006


Fueling that growth
Fueling That Growth Digital Market” Hearing Review

  • Directional microphones

  • Open fit hearing aids

    • 27% of all BTE’s sold in first half of 2006


Why the renaissance in open fit popularity
Why the Renaissance in Open Fit Popularity? Digital Market” Hearing Review

  • Minimal occlusion via a narrow tube fitting (or large vented earmold)

  • Digital feedback cancellation

  • Precise frequency response setting

  • Mini (or micro) BTE designs

    • Open-fit ITE design now available

  • Directional microphones with open fit aids?


Minimal occlusion
Minimal Occlusion Digital Market” Hearing Review

Lybarger S. Earmolds. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 3rd edition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1985: 885-910.


Digital feedback reduction properties
Digital Feedback Reduction Properties Digital Market” Hearing Review

Passive

Active

Phase

Canceller

Notch

Filter


Precise frequency response compression setting
Precise Frequency Response/Compression Setting Digital Market” Hearing Review

  • Digital hearing instruments offer the most precise hearing instrument performance setting:

    • Multiple bands

    • Variable compression settings by band

      • Low and multiple knee points

      • Variable compression ratios

  • This makes digital hearing aids dynamically interactive


Objective verification of open fittings

Objective Verification of Open Fittings Digital Market” Hearing Review


Real ear basics
Real Ear Basics Digital Market” Hearing Review

Real-ear loudspeakers

Probe Microphone Assemblies


Key issues
Key Issues Digital Market” Hearing Review

  • Input stimulus

    • Traditional options

      • Sweep frequency pure tone

      • Noise stimulus

    • Speech stimuli

      • Activates adaptive features


The output of a compression aid depends on the nature of its input signal
The Digital Market” Hearing Reviewoutput of a compression aid depends on the nature of its input signal


The output of a compression aid depends on the nature of its input signal1
The Digital Market” Hearing Reviewoutput of a compression aid depends on the nature of its input signal


The output of a compression aid depends on the nature of its input signal2
The Digital Market” Hearing Reviewoutput of a compression aid depends on the nature of its input signal


Key issues1
Key Issues Digital Market” Hearing Review

  • Insertion gain vs. audibility

    • Traditional method

      • REUR – REAR = REIG

        • Does this verify audibility has been delivered?

        • Does this demonstrate “improvement” with open-fittings?

    • Audibility method

      • REAR compared to audibility threshold


For this compression hearing aid gain for speech @ gain for tones

Oh good, Digital Market” Hearing Review

it doesn’t matter

which I use!

For this compression hearing aid...Gain for speech @Gain for tones


Output for speech is much less than output for pure tones

Maybe you Digital Market” Hearing Review

should just

listen to

tones.

Output for speech is much less than output for pure tones.


Speech is an excellent wdrc measurement stimulus
Speech Is An Excellent WDRC Measurement Stimulus Digital Market” Hearing Review

  • It IS the most important input signal that the patient will want to hear well and comfortably

  • It interacts with multi-band compressors in a more realistic way than tones

    • band interactions across frequency

    • changing intensity


Understanding an splogram the unaided splogram

Loud speech Digital Market” Hearing Review

Avg. speech

Sounds get louder as you go UP the scale

Soft speech

Understanding an SPLogramThe Unaided SPLogram

Maximum output targets

dB SPL Eardrum reference

Threshold (dB SPL TM)

Normal hearing

1) Recruitment

Accommodation


Example of open fit rear result
Example of Open-Fit REAR Result Digital Market” Hearing Review

Aid’s contribution

Pink banana = REAR with aid OFF

Green banana = REAR with aid ON


The sii score
The SII Score Digital Market” Hearing Review


An open fit verification protocol
An Open-Fit Verification Protocol Digital Market” Hearing Review

  • Measure REAR with instrument on ear but turned off

  • Measure REAR with instrument on ear and turned on

  • Adjust gain to maximize SII without invoking feedback

  • Use the fitting screen as a counseling tool



The aided frequency response that reaches the ear
The Aided Frequency Response That Reaches The Ear Digital Market” Hearing Review


Two omni directional mics with digital processor
Two Omni-directional Mics With Digital Processor Digital Market” Hearing Review

DSP

H. Dillon; NAL, CRC for CI and HAI


Measuring directional microphones using polar plots

Measuring Directional Microphones Using Digital Market” Hearing ReviewPolar Plots


Laboratory specification of directionality

0 Digital Market” Hearing Review

360

0

15

345

30

330

-5

45

315

60

-10

300

75

-15

285

90

-20

270

105

255

120

240

135

225

150

210

165

195

180

Laboratory Specification of Directionality

Polar Plots

2) Directional

Verification


Conventional Directional Microphone Test Digital Market” Hearing Review

(Polar Plot Measurement)

Sound Field Speaker

Pure Tone Frequency

Anechoic Chamber


Issues associated with conventional polar plot testing
Issues Associated with Conventional Polar Plot Testing Digital Market” Hearing Review

  • Polar plots are obtained in the presence of a single pure tone frequency

  • Polar plots do not measure in the presence of multiple input sources

  • Polar plots can not be obtained in the presence of non-linear (compression) amplification


Obtaining a Directional Microphone Frequency Response in the Presence of Multiple Input Source Locations

A New Way of Measuring Directional Microphone Performance


Verifit Testing System Hardware Presence of Multiple Input Source Locations

Coupler Chamber

Secondary Signal

Source

Main Signal

Source


Directional frequency response input stimulus

= Secondary input signal (512 pure tones 7.8 Hz apart) Presence of Multiple Input Source Locations

Directional Frequency Response Input Stimulus

= Main input signal (512 pure tones 7.8Hz apart)

Frequency (KHz)


Concept Behind Directional Box Test Presence of Multiple Input Source Locations

Main Speaker

Secondary Speaker


Clinical Verification of Directional Performance Presence of Multiple Input Source Locations

B) Verifit REM Directional Verification

Test selection

Hearing Instrument Test

Linear

AGC

Directional

Distortion

Input/Gain

Multicurve

Telecoil

Manual control

Calibration

Real-Ear Measurement

Speechmap

Insertion gain

Directional

Manual control

Calibration

2) Directional

Verification


Directionality test rem
Directionality Test (REM) Presence of Multiple Input Source Locations

Verifit System

In REM Directional

Mode

Rear Facing Auxiliary Speaker

Subject

Aided Ear

With Probe

Tube Positioned

2) Directional

Verification


On ear directional test result
On-Ear Directional Test Result Presence of Multiple Input Source Locations

REAR to Front Signal

REAR to Back Signal


Viewport screen view facilitates results comparison
Viewport Screen View Facilitates Results Comparison Presence of Multiple Input Source Locations


Example of complete box test viewport result
Example of Complete Box-test Viewport Result Presence of Multiple Input Source Locations


Srt in noise improvement with open fit directional mic
SRT-in-Noise Improvement With Open Fit Directional Mic Presence of Multiple Input Source Locations

Fabry, D., “Facts vs. Myths: The ‘Skinny’ On Slim-Tube Open Fittings” Hearing Review, May, 2006


Conclusions
Conclusions Presence of Multiple Input Source Locations

  • Modern open-fits facilitated by:

    • Digital control of feedback

    • Digital control of non-linearity

    • Digital improvement in directional performance

  • Objective on-ear measurements of open-fit products are possible

    • Key elements to accomplish this:

      • Speech input stimuli

      • Measure eardrum SPL instead of gain

  • Objective measures of directional performance are possible

    • Can confirm directional function in aided area


  • ad