130 likes | 226 Views
This guide explores various composite approaches for electronic clinical quality measures, including criterion-based composites, absolute score composites, linear combinations, and opportunity scoring. It also covers how composites can be adjusted through factors like level of aggregation, threshold scoring, and weighting. The source material includes an evaluation of different analytic approaches for combining multiple indicators of clinical quality. Examples and explanations are provided for each approach to help healthcare providers understand and implement these methodologies effectively.
E N D
Composite Approaches for Electronic Clinical Quality Measures January 17, 2014
Types of Composites • Criterion-based composites: Require an assumption about what constitutes good or sufficient quality • All-or-none • Any-or-none • Absolute score composites: Summarize quality of care without assuming a standard of quality • Linear combination • Opportunity scoring • Regression-based • Options to amend the composite: • Level of aggregation (patient or component) • Threshold/benchmark scoring (variant of all-or-none) • Weighting • Source: Reeves, D., S.M. Campbell, J. Adams, P.G.Shekelle, E. Kontopantelis, and M.O. Roland. “Combining Multiple Indicators of Clinical Quality: An Evaluation of Different Analytic Approaches.” Medical Care, vol. 45, no. 6, June 2007, pp. 489–496.
All-or-None: Explanation and Example • Gives provider credit only if a patient meets the criteria for all components of the measure • From example patient population, only patient A received all screenings for which they were eligible
Any-or-None: Explanation and Example • Gives provider credit for patients who meet the criteria for at least one component of the measure • Somewhat of a reversal of “all-or-none” • From the example patient population, all 5 patients received at least one screening
Linear Combination: Explanation and Example • Average of scores across individual measure components • Gives provider partial credit for meeting the criteria for some but not all components of the measure
Opportunity Scoring: Explanation and Example • Ratio of instances when provider meets the measure criteria for a particular component of the measure to the number of “opportunities” to meet individual components
Regression Based: Explanation and Example • Weights items relative to their reliability or strength of association with a gold standard outcome (e.g., mortality) • Requires extensive data to derive and validate regression model An example score is not easy to illustrate for this approach. The weights for each measure component would be calculated using a regression model.
Level of Aggregation: Explanation and Example • Composite approaches can combine individual measures at either the patient or component level • Patient level: all-or-none • Component level: opportunity scoring • Either: linear combination • Example: Component level linear combination
Threshold/Benchmark Scoring: Explanation and Example • A patient qualifies for the numerator if he or she meets a particular percentage of component measures. • Example: Patients must meet at least 70% of the components to quality for the numerator
Weighting: Explanation and Example • Gives more credit for meeting certain components • Example: The first and tenth screenings get twice the weight of the others