Reading a paper R-E-A-D-ER. Relevant?Educational? Does it add anything?Applicable? Primary-care based?Discrimination - does it answer the questions it set out to? Any patients excluded? Appropriate design / statistics? Concepts understood risk, NNT, etc?Evaluation (oveRall)RCT of the READ
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
“RCT of the READER method of critical appraisal in general practice”.
MacAuley et al, BMJ 1997; 316:134 (11/4/97).
“Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of over the counter cough medicines for acute cough in adults”.
Schroeder, K and Fahey, T. BMJ 2002; 324:329-31 (9/2/02).