coordination and management of the hiv aids response n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE HIV/AIDS RESPONSE PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE HIV/AIDS RESPONSE

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 18

COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE HIV/AIDS RESPONSE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 134 Views
  • Uploaded on

COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE HIV/AIDS RESPONSE. John Rwomushana Uganda AIDS Commission Secretariat 4 TH NATIONAL AIDS PARTNERSHIP FORUM Speke Resort Munyonyo 30 Jan -1 st Feb 2006. PREAMBLE. Goal of Coordination Timely ,equitable, quality services One coordinating Authority 1992

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE HIV/AIDS RESPONSE' - jens


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
coordination and management of the hiv aids response

COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE HIV/AIDS RESPONSE

John Rwomushana

Uganda AIDS Commission Secretariat

4TH NATIONAL AIDS PARTNERSHIP FORUM

Speke Resort Munyonyo 30 Jan -1st Feb 2006

preamble
PREAMBLE
  • Goal of Coordination
    • Timely ,equitable, quality services
      • One coordinating Authority 1992
  • Source of current info
    • Joint Sector reviews Sept, Oct, 2005
    • JAR and SCE Assessment Dec 2005 issues
coordination administrative levels
COORDINATION ADMINISTRATIVE LEVELS
  • National (central)
  • District
  • Sub district (Sub-County, Village)
central level coordination
CENTRAL LEVEL COORDINATION
  • AIDS Partnership (stakeholder alignment) established 2002
  • Composition
    • PForum
    • Self Coordinating Entities (SCEs)
    • Partnership Committee
    • Fund
slide5

The Uganda AIDS Partnership

Uganda AIDS Commission

& Secretariat

Media

AIDS PARTNERSHIP FORUM

coordination at central level
COORDINATION AT CENTRAL LEVEL …
  • SCE Assessment (2005) Objectives:
    • Ascertain achievements gaps/challenges and emerging issues in SCE functional roles
    • Identify “good practice” within SCEs
    • Recommended steps for improvement
sce assessment 2005 findings
SCE ASSESSMENT (2005) FINDINGS
  • Strengths/Achievements
    • Formal and representative platform
    • Regular opportunity to share strategic information for policy and program design
    • Identification of needs, priorities , action
    • Some uniformity and alignment to national processes
issues not anticipated
ISSUES NOT ANTICIPATED
  • Performance levels and added value of SCEs to improved coordination remained limited
  • Low capacity to fulfill coordination tasks
  • Structures not fully functional
sce assessment findings
SCE ASSESSMENT FINDINGS
  • Challenges:
    • Slow understanding of Partnership dynamics
    • SCE delegates not truly representatives
    • Information sharing was limited
    • Slow to implement work plans
    • PFund was sole source of funding for most SCEs
    • Poor follow-up on decisions
    • Inadequate advocacy
    • Reporting/ feedback format is not standard
sce assessment findings1
SCE ASSESSMENT FINDINGS
  • Recommended possible solutions
    • Re-orient SCE members on purpose of Partnership
    • Membership be of institution not by individual
    • Rationalize frequency of PC meetings – proposed quarterly
    • Intensify homogenous member group mobilization
    • PFund to strengthen SCEs coordination capacity
    • Better exchange information (inter-and intra-SCE)
    • Diversify resource sources
    • UAC to regularize, standardize and firmly establish the Partnership
coordination in the district
COORDINATION IN THE DISTRICT
  • Coordination Policy Guideline developed in 2002
      • TWG (MoLG, MoH,ULAA,AIM,UAC and UNAIDS…)
  • District leaders Consensus Sept 2002
  • Structures conform to decentralization framework
  • Taskforces (political) and Committees (Technical) system – district and Sub-county
      • Taskforces at Parish and Village.
district coordination
DISTRICT COORDINATION
  • Reporting channels
    • existing linkages with MoLG and MoPS
    • Direct to UAC (by Chair, CAO, AIDS FP)
  • Ratification and adoption
    • Orientation from UAC and MoLG
    • Establishment of structures at the various levels
attainments
ATTAINMENTS
  • Ratification of Policy Guideline (Some)
  • Sub district Coordination structures (few)
  • Functional tasks (few)
  • Partnership alignment (minimal)
challenges
CHALLENGES
  • Adoption and ratification of Guidelines
  • Establishment of structures at the various levels
  • Representation and membership to the Taskforces and Committees
  • Joint planning, M&E
  • Strategic information sharing
  • Coordination at district & lower levels still weak
  • Limited resources
  • Linkages to central level
recommended actions
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
  • District Councils to ratify Guideline
  • All districts to designate AIDS Focal Persons
  • Appropriate participation at DAT and DAC
  • Intensify resource mobilization for district responses and coordination
    • Greater enagagement of PHAs
challenges and opportunity
CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITY
  • 4th One – Aligned funding channels
  • Modus operandi
    • Joint NSF,M&E
    • Tasks for coordination function
  • Transfer the national progress to the district
    • Create appropriate district partnerships ( stakeholder alignment)
  • Unique opportunity - Gathered district leaders
conclusion
CONCLUSION
  • Effective coordination determines successful national AIDS responses
  • Devolution of coordination functions to SCEs (alignment) is innovative
  • This forum will critique the present strategic information; identify emerging issues; and design future actions