1 / 18

Influence in MultiAgent Systems Application to Coalitions

Influence in MultiAgent Systems Application to Coalitions. Z. Maamar, P. Labb é , W. Mansoor, E. Bataineh KSCO’2002 - Toulouse. Plan. Overview Definitions Analysis Conclusion. Overview. Purpose: Influence Framework to understand and predict the behavior of software agents. Influence:

jemma
Download Presentation

Influence in MultiAgent Systems Application to Coalitions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Influence in MultiAgent SystemsApplication to Coalitions Z. Maamar, P. Labbé, W. Mansoor, E. Bataineh KSCO’2002 - Toulouse

  2. Plan • Overview • Definitions • Analysis • Conclusion

  3. Overview • Purpose: Influence Framework to understand and predict the behavior of software agents. • Influence: • Investigates the causes of human modification (behavior, attitude, belief) • Two components: who influences and who is influenced

  4. Influence in MASs: • Goal and Belief levels: knowledge perspective • Task and Resource levels: organization perspective GBTR Framework • The four levels are connected together • Influence as a cognitive process by which an agent acquires new knowledge (social learning)

  5. Definitions – GBTR framework • Goal influence: agent’s goal-hierarchy is adapted, after the insertion of a new goal in this hierarchy • Belief influence: agent’s belief-repository is updated, after the insertion of a new belief in this repository

  6. Task influence: agent’s task-repository is updated, after either the insertion of a new task in this repository or the modification of the characteristics of a specific task of this repository • Resource influence: agent’s resource repository is updated. This agent could either receive additional resources or lose some of its resources momentarily

  7. Awareness Module • a.     Locating Agents. • b.     Establishing Relationships with them. Examples of relationships could be friendly and hostile. • c.       Understand their operations.

  8. Assessment module • The agent are new or existing • Investigate the relationship • Analysis

  9. Analysis – GBTR framework • An agent could influence another agent at goal, belief, task, and resource levels • 8 combinations are obtained

  10. Scenario

  11. Goal influence • Positive influence between vessel1 and vessel2: carry_troops_for_vessel2 • Negative influence between vessel1and submarine1 :provide_support_to_vessel1

  12. Belief influence: • Positive influence between vessel1 and submarine1: -         reinforcement of submarine1’s beliefs. • Negative influence between vessel1 and vessel2: contradiction of what vessel2 assumed about submarine1’s responsibilities.

  13. Task influence: • Positive influence between vessel1 and vessel2: vessel1 has been ordered to transport equipments on behalf of vessel2. • Negative influence between vessel1 and submarine1: submarine1 will fulfill new tasks for vessel1, such as attacking the enemy float. In fact, these tasks have not been planned in submarine1’s initial schedule.

  14. Resource influence: • Positive influence between vessel1 and vessel2: The new tasks that vessel1 will carry out requires the use of its resources, such as a crane. • Negative influence between vessel1 and submarine1: submarine1 will use its resources.

  15. Conclusion • The GBTR framework • Knowledge and organization perspectives • Influence could be either positive or negative • Coalition as a running scenarios to illustrate the feasibility of the GBTR framework

More Related