1 / 45

# Theory of the Firm - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Theory of the Firm. Firms want to maximize profit This implies minimizing cost Need to identify underlying technological relationships between inputs and outputs. Factors of Production Inputs. Broadly – labor, land, raw materials, capital Motion picture studio:

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Theory of the Firm' - jemima-schneider

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

• Firms want to maximize profit

• This implies minimizing cost

• Need to identify underlying technological relationships between inputs and outputs.

Factors of ProductionInputs

• Broadly – labor, land, raw materials, capital

• Motion picture studio:

• producers, directors, actors, lots, sound stages, equipment, film.

• Electricity Generator

• Managers, technicians, coal, generation equipment, (clean air)

Specification of Technology – one output

• Production function: f(x) = {y such that y is the maximum output associated with –x}

• Cobb Douglas f(x1,x2) = x1ax2(1-a)

• Leontiff f(x1,x2) = min(ax1,bx2)

• CES f(x1,x2) = [ax1r + bx2r]1/r

• Linear f(x1,x2) = x1 + x2

Sketch the Cobb Douglas, Leontiff, and Linear Isoquants

Specification of Technology – one output

Cobb Douglas Isoquants

f(x1,x2) = x1ax2(1-a)

Specification of Technology – one output

slope a/b

input 2

Q(y2)

Q(y1)

input 1

• Leontiff isoquant

• f(x1,x2) = min(ax1,bx2)

• The technical rate of substitution is the amount that you need to adjust one input in order to keep output constant for a small change in another output. This is equivalent to the slope of the isoquant.

If the production function is f(x1,x2) what is the technical rate of substitution?

• The elasticity of substitution measures the curvature of the isoquant:

s = d(x1/x2)/(x1/x2)

d(TRS)/TRS

The higher s, the less curved the isoquant is, and easier it is to substitute between inputs.

s = ∞

Input 2

s = 1 (Cobb Douglas)

s = - ∞

Input 1

Constant Elasticity of Substitution

f(x1,x2) = [ax1r + bx2r]1/r

s = 1/(1-r)

• Let f(x1,x2) =

• Find the TRS

• Then, try to find the elasticity of substitution, using the ln formulation.

• Constant returns to scale: a doubling of inputs will result in a doubling of output.

• f(tx) = tf(x) the production function is homogeneous of degree 1.

• Increasing returns to scale

• f(tx) > tf(x)

• example: fixed costs

• Decreasing returns to scale

• f(tx) < tf(x)

• example: a fixed input

• Bausch and Lomb. A 12-oz bottle of saline solution costs \$2.79. A 1-oz bottle of eye drops costs \$5.65.

• People’s Express. Very successful, attributed partly to management practices (minimal hierachy, training, profit sharing, performance pay). Grew from 300 to 5000 employees. Active involvement became difficult, more hierarch necessary, output increased less than input.

• Oil shippers: unlimited liability in case of a spill. Therefore a small firm with only one ship is preferable.

• In the short run some inputs may be fixed.

• In the long run, we generally consider all inputs to be variable.

• Example: Capacity

• Basic assumption of Economics. Is it right?

• The firm takes actions that will maximize the total revenues – costs.

Max R(a) – C(a)

F.O.C. R’(a) = C’(a)

MR = MC

• The level of output should be chosen so that the cost of producing the last unit of output is equal to the revenue from that unit.

• In 1962 Continental Airlines filled only 50% of certain flights. It considered dropping some of these flights, but each flight had a (marginal) cost of \$2000 and revenue of \$3100.

• Revenue = the price of what is sold X the amount that is sold

• Cost = the price of the inputs X the amount of input used.

• Technological Constraints

• Market Constraints

• Assume that the firm is a price-taker (competitive firm)

• Max pf(x) –wx

• foc characterizes profit-maximizing behavior.

• “value marginal product = its price”

• What is the requirement on f(x) for a maximum to exist? What is the SOC?

• demand function

x(p,w) = argmax pf(x) – wx

• Supply function

y(p,w) = f(x(p,w))

• Profit Function

p(p,w) = py(p,w) – wx(p,w)

• A function is homogeneous of degree n if f(tx)=tnx

• If a function is homogneous of degree 0, then doubling all its inputs doesn’t change the output.

• If a function is homogenous of degree 1, then doubling all inputs doubles the outputs.

• Consider the demand function x(p,w). What happens if you double all prices?

• Consider the profit function, p(p,w). What happens if you double all prices?

• What about the supply function?

• What does this say about behavior under inflation?

p(p,w) = py(p,w) – wx(p,w)

• Increasing in output prices; decreasing in input prices

• Homogeneous of degree 1 in prices.

• Convex in p (!)

These properties follow only from the assumption of profit maximization.

p(p,w) = Max pf(x) –wx

Prove it using the envelope theorem

Let y max profits at p, y’ at p’, and y’’ at p’’, where p’’ = tp + (1-t)p’

Then

p(p’’) = p’’y’’ = (tp + (1-t)p’)y’’

= tpy’’ + (1-t)p’y’’ < tpy + (1-t)p’y’

= tp(p) + (1-t)p(p’)

Why is this true?

profits

p(p)

py*-w*x*

p(p*)

p*

output price

Suppose the price of output is randomly fluctuating. Is it desirable to stabilize this price?

Jensen’s inequality:

p(E[p]) < E[p(p)] for any convex p.

Thus, firms do better when price fluctuates! Because they change their production plan accordingly.

When might this not be true?

• Use the envelope theorem to find

• Use the envelope theorem to find

• Consider a firm with 3 inputs – x, ec,enc with prices w,pc,pnc

• Carbon emissions are equal to ec

• Carbon is taxed at level t

• Thus total price of ec is pc+t

• Now consider technical change that reduces the carbon intensity.

• Let technical change a reduce the carbon intesity from 1 to (1-a)

• After technical change the total price for ec would be pc+(1-a)t

• The profit function is p(w, pc+(1-a)t,pnc)

• In order to maximize profit, a firm must be minimizing the cost of producing its output.

• Cost minimization is an alternate characterization of price-taking firms.

Max py – c(w,y) Where

c(w,y) = min wx

s.t. y = f(x)

• Cost minimization is equally valid for other types of firms

Min wx

s.t. f(x) = y

Lagrangian

L(l,x) = wx – l(f(x) – y)

F.O.C.

wi-ldf(x*)/dxi = 0

f(x*) = y

Divide the ith constraint by the jth

df(x*)/dxi = wi

df(x*)/dxj wj

Economic rate of substitution = TRS

Input 2

f(x1,x2) = y

Input 1

isocost line. slope = -w1/w2

Input 2

f(x1,x2) = y

Input 1

isocost line. slope = -w1/w2

How does this differ from the utility maximization problem?

• Graph the demand for factor x1 as a function of its price w1 for the 3 production functions below.

x2

x2

x2

x1

x1

x1

• In order to solve constrained optimization problems when there might be a corner solution, we need to use the Kuhn-Tucker Theorem.

df(x*)/dxi = df(x*)/dxj

wi wj

Marginal product per \$

One dollar invested in xi increases output by df(x*)/dxi

wi

To minimize cost you must equalize the rates of return on each input.

• parking lots: tall versus expansive

• Increasing or decreasing in w?

• Homogeneous of degree ? in w?

• Convex or concave?

s = ∞

Input 2

s = 1 (Cobb Douglas)

s = - ∞

Input 1