1 / 17

Enhancing Instructor Course Evaluation System at UC Davis: Strategies for Improved Compliance

This report by Dr. Jan E. Ilkiw and Raymond Y. Tai from the School of Veterinary Medicine at UC Davis evaluates the effectiveness of the Instructor Course Evaluation System. It highlights student compliance rates over three years and proposes steps to improve participation. The suggested strategies include promoting data interchange, standardizing formats, and collaborating with Sakai Evaluation Task Force.

jeff
Download Presentation

Enhancing Instructor Course Evaluation System at UC Davis: Strategies for Improved Compliance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Instructor/Course Evaluation System Jan E. Ilkiw, BVSc., Ph.D. Raymond Y. Tai, MS School of Veterinary Medicine University of California, Davis

  2. Reports Instructor report

  3. Completion • Initially asked students to complete • Year 1 - good compliance • Year 2 - lower compliance • Year 3 - 25% compliance • Focus groups with students • Make it mandatory

  4. Completion • Discuss it at first year orientation • Importance stressed on RSP • Email all students 3 times • Students who do not comply • Hold placed on registration for elective classes • To lift hold have to complete paper copies of evaluations

  5. Completion • Two years ago • 75% completion in year 3 • Appointment • 97% completion all years

  6. What Next? • Encourage collaborative data interchange between existing academic and administrative systems across campus such as MyInfoVault; • Encourage the development of standards based data interchange formats; • Participate in Sakai Evaluation Task Force

More Related