430 likes | 606 Views
PROGRESS MONITORING. FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute . Progress Monitoring: Learning Goals for Today. Determine student’s current level of performance (Baseline data) CBM Identify learning goal (norms)
E N D
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute
Progress Monitoring: Learning Goals for Today • Determine student’s current level of performance (Baseline data) CBM • Identify learning goal (norms) • Implement Research-Based Interventions • Continue to measure and monitor students’ performance on a regular basis • Graph the results • Compare expected progress to actual rate • Adjust instruction based on the data
What IS Progress Monitoring WordMap Find the in your handout packet. Work with your TEAM to complete this. Be ready to share a specific example of Progress Monitoring in your school. Handout PM 1
Progress Monitoring is a scientifically-based practice that is used to assess students’ academic performance and evaluate the effectiveness of instruction – for an individual student or an entire class.” National Center on Progress Monitoring www.studentprogress.org
A Scientific Base Supports One Form of Progress Monitoring: Curriculum-Based Measurement CBM
Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) . . . • Result of 20-30 years of research • Used in schools across the country • Uses short “probes” for frequent PM • Demonstrates strong reliability and validity • Is sensitive to small gains in progress • Helps teachers plan instruction
Uses of CBM Benchmark All Students – 3 times a year – F, W, S Strategic Monitor Monthly check up for students with moderate skill deficits who are receiving supplemental instruction in small group (3-5) Progress Monitor Monitor once or twice weekly to measure student’s response to more intensive interventions (individual or group of 2). Graph the data for on-going decision making.
2006 School Calendar Year (2006-2007):Benchmarking (Tier 1) 2007 2-weeks during:September 1 to October 15 January 1 to February 1 May 1 to June 1
Benchmark Data For Teachers: Classroom Report AIMSweb.com
Box and Whisker Charts ____________________________________ Student is above the 90 %ile and is well above average. 90th %ile 75th %ile 50th %ile 25th %ile Target 10th %ile AIMSweb
Decision Making Rules Students who score below the 25th percentile on general outcome benchmark screening receive targeted intervention, and progress is monitored on a monthly basis. Progress for those below the 10th percentile is monitored at least weekly, and they receive intensive intervention. Eight data points over at least 4 weeks are required to determine a trend line. Change or modify the intervention when the data points are below the aim line (goal line) for 4 consecutive data points, or when the trend line is not on course to meet the goal line.
How Does Student Progress Monitoring Work? • Determine student’s current level of performance (Baseline data) • Identify learning goal (local norms or accepted research standards) • Use research based intervention(s) targeting the problem • Continue to measure performance on a regular basis (CBM probes at same level) • Graph the results • Compare expected progress to actual rate • Adjust instruction based on the data
Calculating Slope: First draw a Trend Line – Tukey Method Step 1: Divide the data points into three equal sections by drawing two vertical lines. (If the points divide unevenly, group them approximately.) Step 2: In the first and third sections, find the median data-point and median instructional week. Locate the place on the graph where the two values intersect and mark with an “X.” Step 3: Draw a line through the two Xs, extending to the margins of the graph. This represents the trend-line or line of improvement. www.studentprogress.org PM 2
Step 1: Divide the data points into three equal sections by drawing two vertical lines. (If the points divide unevenly, group them approximately.) Step 2: In the first and third sections, find the median data-point and median instructional week. Locate the place on the graph where the two values intersect and mark with an “X.” Step 3: Draw a line through the two Xs, extending to the margins of the graph. This represents the trend-line or line of improvement.
Step 1: Divide the data points into three equal sections by drawing two vertical lines. (If the points divide unevenly, group them approximately.) Step 2: In the first and third sections, find the median data-point and median instructional week. Locate the place on the graph where the two values intersect and mark with an “X.” Step 3: Draw a line through the two Xs, extending to the margins of the graph. This represents the trend-line or line of improvement. X X
Step 1: Divide the data points into three equal sections by drawing two vertical lines. (If the points divide unevenly, group them approximately.) Step 2: In the first and third sections, find the median data-point and median instructional week. Locate the place on the graph where the two values intersect and mark with an “X.” Step 3: Draw a line through the two Xs, extending to the margins of the graph. This represents the trend-line or line of improvement. X X
Baseline Data & GoalTOM • Second grade student, fall assessment, oral reading fluency, second grade probes • Baseline Data: day 1 =11, day 2 = 13, day 3 =12 • Plot these points on your graph PM 3
Baseline Data & Goal Line • Baseline Data: 11, 13, 12 • Find the median, or middle number when numbers are rank ordered: 11, 12, 13 • Median = 12 words read correctly per min. • Average Peer = ? Use norms table, Handout PM 4 • Rate of Improvement = ? Words per wk. • Use norms table, Handout PM 4
Baseline Data & Goal • Baseline Data: 11, 13, 12 • Median = 12 words read correctly per min. • Average Peer = 55 wrc per minute • Average Rate of Improvement = 1.1 words per week. • Set a realistic but ambitious goal, such as: • Goal = 2 words per minute more per week
Baseline Data & Goal • Goal = 2 words per minute more per week • Select # wks for monitoring: Weeks =12 • Calculate: 2 wds./wk. increase, times 12 wks. = 24 words total increase • Add the expected 24 word increase to baseline (12). Goal= 36 wrc in 12 weeks • Mark the goal point (36) on the last data collection day, Thursday, at the end of 12 weeks of intervention. • Connect baseline data median(12) to the goal point (36) = Goal Line (Aim Line)
Intervention Data Points Enter this data on your graph and draw a trend line.
Data-Based Decision Making • Were there 4 consecutive data points below the goal line? • Are there 8 data points for a trend line? • Is the trend line on course to meet the goal line? • Is this intervention effective? • Decision?
Intervention #2 Data Points Enter this data on your graph and draw a trend line.
Intervention 2 Intervention 1
Data-Based Decision Making • Draw a vertical line to show each intervention change. • Label “Intervention 1”, “Intervention 2”, etc. • Keep records of specific intervention protocols and fidelity of implementation. • What is your decision based on Intervention 2 data?
Why is Fidelity Important? • To demonstrate that measurable changes in behavior are related to systematic & controlled changes in the environment (intervention) • Without objective & documented evidence that the intervention was implemented as planned, we can’t conclude that inadequate response to intervention was due to a poor intervention or insufficient intensity (ie: inadequate response may be due to poor instruction.) • Likewise, success can’t be attributed to the intervention if we don’t know how it was implemented
More Practice ! 3rd Grade Winter R-CBM – Mia - Baseline Tues. 34 WRC Wed. 40 Thurs. 36 Enter the data. Mark MEDIAN with X PM 5
Graphing: Make Mia’s Goal Line Set a Reasonable but Ambitious Goal What is the average Rate of Improvement (ROI) for third grade? – norms – PM 4 Would a gain of 15 words per week be ambitious? Reasonable? Would a gain of 2 words per week be ambitions? Reasonable? Calculate Mia’s goal at the end of 12 weeks. Graph the GOAL LINE (Aim Line)
Mia’s Problem Statement “When given a third grade oral reading fluency probe, Mia reads 36 words correctly in one minute. Her average third grade peer reads 98 words correctly in one minute.” Intervention: Repeated Readings 2:30 – 2:50 M/W/F Implemented by: Classroom teacher Progress Monitor: T/Th R-CBM (3rd)
Mia’s Progress Monitoring Data Mia’s R-CBM scores (Tues./Thurs.) Week 1: 34, 36 Week 2: 42, 36 Week 3: 36, 38 Week 4: 38, 38 Graph the data. PM 5
Make a Trend Line Use Mia’s data: Weeks 1-4 (Don’t include the baseline data) Use the Tukey Method to draw a trend line. Compare Mia’s Trend Line & Goal Line. What’s your decision about the intervention?
To Monitor Student Progress • Determine student’s current level (Baseline) • Identify learning Goal (local/research norms) • Research based Intervention(s) target problem • Implement with Fidelity • Continue to measure performance on a regular basis (CBM probes at same level) • Graph the results • Compare expected progress to actual rate • Adjust instruction based on the data
Where Do We Go From Here? RtI / SLD Eligibility Determination? Students who score below the 25th percentile on general outcome benchmark screening receive targeted intervention, and progress is monitored on a monthly basis. Progress for those below the 10th percentile is monitored at least weekly, and they receive intensive intervention. Eight data points over at least 4 weeks are required to determine a trend line. Change or modify the intervention when the data points are below the aim line (goal line) for 4 consecutive data points or when the trend line is not on course to meet the goal line. At least 2 intervention changes (ie: 3 interventions) are required before students may be referred for evaluation due to suspected disability.
Special Education Regulations Apply at Time of Referral • Letter to parent informing of referral • Evaluation decisions made by the Evaluation Team at the Review of Existing Data/Evaluation Plan Meeting. • Parents are given written notice and must sign consent for the evaluation. “Specialized Instruction” is listed under “other” in the area of functioning (Ex: “Specialized Instruction, 225 minutes per week, special ed resource room.”) • Specialized instruction must be very focused and targeted at the problem as operationally defined in the problem statement.
CBMis used to collect data in all academic areas, administered frequently (2X/wk) • The Evaluation must be comprehensive and address all areas of concern. • Consider norm referenced achievement assessment in addition to CBM (if not indicated in the student’s records). Level of performance must be far below & rate of improvement far below average peers. • Use cognitive assessment if broad & pervasive concerns with student’s functioning across areas. • However, do not calculate a discrepancy between IQ and norm referenced achievement scores. This information is not relevant to determining eligibility or interventions. See Handouts PM 7 & PM 8 for more specific procedues.
Progress Monitoring & IEP Goals Formula for Good Goals Using CBM Given a (specific grade level and subject area) probe, STUDENT will (increase/decrease/maintain) his/her ability to (state skill addressed) by (observable behavior) from (insert baseline) to (insert goal) for (insert monitoring period)
References • Deno, S. (2003). Developments in Curriculum-Based Measurement. Journal of Special Education (37) (3), 184-192. • Fuchs, L. & Fuchs, D. (2002). Curriculum-based measurement: Describing competence, enhancing outcomes, evaluating treatment effects, and identifying treatment nonresponders. Peabody Journal of Education, 77, 64-84. • Hosp, M. & Hosp, J. (2003). Curriculum-based measurement for reading, math, and spelling: How to do it and why. Preventing School Failure, 48 (1), 10-17.