html5-img
1 / 18

Gamma-Ray Bursts observed by XMM-Newton

Gamma-Ray Bursts observed by XMM-Newton. Paul O’Brien X-ray and Observational Astronomy Group, University of Leicester Collaborators:-

jean
Download Presentation

Gamma-Ray Bursts observed by XMM-Newton

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gamma-Ray Bursts observed by XMM-Newton Paul O’Brien X-ray and Observational Astronomy Group, University of Leicester Collaborators:- James Reeves,Darach Watson, Julian Osborne, Ken Pounds, Alex Short, Martin Turner, Mike Watson, Keith Mason, Norbert Schartel, M Santos-Lleo, Matthaus Ehle.

  2. The Compton Gamma Ray Observatory

  3. GRB 970228: BeppoSAX Observations X-ray and optical counterparts seen: z=0.695 (Djorgovski et al. 1999) X-RAY IMAGES OF REGION CENTRED ON THE GRB 1997February 28 1997 March 3

  4. Optical Afterglows & Host Galaxies GRB 971214 - Keck GRB 990123 - HST host galaxy GRB

  5. merging neutron star binary collapse of giant star Predicted  duration ~ seconds Predicted  duration ~ 10s of seconds Possible Models for the Progenitor High energy (high mass), compact objects two leading models Both models produce an accreting black hole or a milli-second pulsar Both models have very high angular momentum Both models give beamed emission Jet internal/external shocks + interaction with surroundings afterglow The models predict different line spectra

  6. XMM-Newton Observation of GRB 011211Reeves et al (2002): Nature, 416, 512Reeves et al (2003): A&A, 403, 463 NOT, R band image XMM-Newton EPIC

  7. Optical Follow-up of GRB 011211 GRB Host Redshift determined as z=2.1400.001 Holland et al. (2002) HST:- GRB host galaxy (Fox 2002)

  8. The X-ray Spectrum of GRB 011211 – first 5 ksec Power-law Fit (=2.2)

  9. Hydrogenic lines from Mg, Si, S, Ar and Ca detected in first 10ksec x10 Solar abundances, but no iron line (<1.4 Solar) – Supernova? Sig. at 99.97% Si XIV Mg XI/XII S XVI Ar XVIII Ca XX Lines are blueshifted: outflow velocity = 26000 km s-1

  10. Why is there no iron line in GRB 011211? Nucleosynthesis Synthesis model for a 40 solar mass progenitor star (e.g. Woosley & Weaver 1995) Iron line only dominates after t > 100 days. Nickel line dominates at t < 10 days.

  11. X-ray afterglow of GRB 001025A - 45 hrs after GRB Watson et al: 2002, A&A, 393, L1 Line emission? Sig. 99.87% Zx = 0.53 +/- 0.03 Soft excess line emission? Fading X-ray source P(const) = 0.002 IPN error box Best PL with Galactic absorption

  12. X-ray afterglow of GRB 010220 - 14.8 hrs after GRB Watson et al: 2002, A&A, 393, L1 Sig. 99.87% Zx = 1.0 +/- 0.05 ‘Fe’ line BeppoSAX error box Assumed afterglow P(const) = 0.06 Best PL with Galactic absorption

  13. X-ray afterglow of GRB 020322 - 14.9 hr after GRB Watson et al: 2002, A&A, 395, L41 7.8 hr observation X-ray source fades as t -1.3 Need intrinsic absorption. At Zabs ~ 1.8, NH~1.3x1022 cm-2 Faint, fading optical transient No thermal emission apparent  Excess absorption

  14. Watson et al., 2003, ApJ, 595, L29 GRB 030227 - detection of transient Si, S, Ar, Ca last 10ks only Si S Ar Ca Total flux and line flux variation ~210 line photons (~115 in GRB 011211) K lines from Si, S, Ar and Ca  z=1.350.05 Detection significance = 5 No Fe or Ni/Co lines (<1.6 & <18 solar abundances, cf. 24 solar for light elements)

  15. XMM-Newton GRB afterglows emission line summary

  16. Willingale et al., 2003, MNRAS, submitted GRB 030329 afterglow evolution radio (8.4 GHz) optical (R) Optical + radio excess: Supernova (+?) X-ray (1 keV)

  17. UVOT BAT BAT XRT UVOT XRT Spacecraft Spacecraft Swift –catching gamma ray bursts on the fly GSFC Launch in 2004 BAT 5x sensitivity of BATSE X-ray telescope has a MOS CCD Detect ~150 GRBs/year Response time ~ 100 seconds

  18. Conclusions • Soft X-ray lines detected in most, but not all, XMM-Newton GRB afterglow spectra. • Theoretical models all assume reflection produces lines, but empirical fits prefer thermal models…?? • XMM-Newton EPIC gives ~ x50 the count rate of the BeppoSAX MECS for a typical GRB afterglow spectrum. • XMM-Newton will continue to play an important role in the Swift era– track long-term spectral evolution of the afterglow.

More Related