1 / 17

Testing of INSPIRE validator

Testing of INSPIRE validator. Jiří Poláček Czech Office for Surveying , Mapping and Cadastre. What’s to Come. What we tested and why Course of testing Overview of results Issues to be addressed. Scope of testing. Themes : Cadastral Parcels Addresses Administrative Units

jdanielle
Download Presentation

Testing of INSPIRE validator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Testingof INSPIRE validator Jiří Poláček Czech Office forSurveying, Mapping and Cadastre

  2. What’s to Come • Whatwetested and why • Courseoftesting • Overviewofresults • Issues to beaddressed MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017

  3. Scopeoftesting • Themes: • CadastralParcels • Addresses • AdministrativeUnits • GeographicalNames • Hydrography • Transport Networks • Services: • Metadata • Data • WFS MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017

  4. On-line Local solution ATOM ETL Geoportal Intergraph solution GeodeticControl Geonames ZABAGED Orthoimagery Altimetry MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017

  5. Limitationoftesting MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017

  6. Limitationoftesting Personal problems • Wecould test allmetadata (data series, services, …) exceptdetailedmetadataofdatasets • Solutionispreparedinside ATOM, but itsauthorleft and a newprogrammerstarted to do thiswork MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017

  7. Limitationoftesting • Test stopsatthe very beginning • Issue: as a root element weprovidegml:FeatureCollection, correctformiswfs:FeatureCollection. Thiswecannotuse as theservicecannotgeneratedate and timeoftheservice call (valueoftimeStamp atribute, whichisforwfs:FeatureCollectionobligatory). Intergraph problems MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017

  8. Courseoftesting • Very flexible feedback from JRC, somereportederrors are probablysolved by now • Severalroundsoftesting – aftereliminationanerror in the 1. round, anotheroccurs in thenextround • INSPIRE validatorcalls OGC validator, some OGC validatorexceptions, whichINSPIRE validatoromitted as irrelevant, cause end oftesting in thenextround. MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017

  9. Overviewofresults • 3 cathegoriesoferror (typesoferrors): • Ourerrors (14) • Errorsofvalidatorcoding (3) • Errorsof ATS (3) • Most errorsofcathegory A has beenfixedor are beingfixed, someofthemrequire SW updates (localsolution, Intergraph, QGIS, …) • Allerrorsofcathegories B and C wereimmediatellyrecordedintogithubhttps://github.com/inspire-eu-validation/ MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017

  10. List ofrecordedissues • https://github.com/inspire-eu-validation/ets-repository/issues/87 • https://github.com/inspire-eu-validation/ets-repository/issues/93 • https://github.com/inspire-eu-validation/ets-repository/issues/108 • https://github.com/inspire-eu-validation/ets-repository/issues/113 • https://github.com/inspire-eu-validation/ets-repository/issues/116 • https://github.com/inspire-eu-validation/ets-repository/issues/107 • https://github.com/inspire-eu-validation/ets-repository/issues/106 • https://github.com/inspire-eu-validation/ets-repository/issues/105 • https://github.com/inspire-eu-validation/ets-repository/issues/104 • https://github.com/opengeospatial/ets-wfs20/issues/66 MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017

  11. Overviewofresults II MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017

  12. Exampleofourerrors • Wrongvalues („International“, nilReasonvalues - „unpopulated“, NameStatus - „standardised“, …) • Wecan fix immediatelly • Missingnumberofhits in thefile in case ofcallingpredefined data set as WFS storedquery (https://github.com/inspire-eu-validation/ets-repository/issues/104) • Need to update ourlocal SW • Wrongformofcoordinatessystemidentifier, http: insteadofURN https://github.com/inspire-eu-validation/ets-repository/issues/93 • Easy to fix, but itdoes not work in thecurrent QGIS version (problem in GDAL) MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017

  13. Issues to beaddressed • JRC validatorrequires CRS to befromthe list. If data isprovidedalso in national CRS, validatorevaluatesthem as not valid. • https://github.com/opengeospatial/ets-wfs20/issues/66 EPSG:5514 counted as otvalid • Encodingofspecialcharacters in WFS requestshallbeuniform, eitherweencodeallcharacters (?&) ornone. • https://github.com/inspire-eu-validation/ets-repository/issues/93 • How to validateWFS availableafterregistration (authorisation) onlyfromGeoportal - http://inspire-geoportal.ec.europa.eu/proxybrowser MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017

  14. Data seriesordatasets ? • Wehave to use conceptof data series, becauseforsomeINSPIRE themesonedatasetforwhole Czech Republicwouldbetoo big (example – GML forCadastralparcelsaprox. 200 GB – 1.9 GB in a zippedform) • Numberofdatasetsforindividual INSPIRE themes: • CadastralparcelsCadastral unit 13091 Addresses Municipality 6259 AdministrativeunitsCZ 1 Buildings Municipality 6259 Transport networks Map sheet1:10000 4533 Hydrography Map sheet1:10000 4533 GeographicalnamesMap sheet1:10000 4533 MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017

  15. Data seriesordatasets ? • Wehave 1 WFS for 1 data series (not fortheindividualdatasets, as required) • Wecouldbeeasilyconformant in case werename data series as dataset and dataset as pieceofdataset (subset) and createsomefakefileforthedataset • BUT • In this case wepracticallycannotenable to downloadpieceofdatasetusing ATOM becauseonlydatasetcanbereturned as resposefrom ATOM service, so insteadofseveral KB ouruserswouldhave to download 1.9 GB (zipped) forthewholeterritory. MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017

  16. Conclusion • After 1 monthofintensivetestingwereached 52% ofconformity on INSPIRE Geoportal (http://inspire-geoportal.ec.europa.eu/proxybrowser) • Somecorrectionscanbe done easily, somewilltakeseveralmonth, someissuesmustbesolved on MIG level • In case we face decision to limit significantlyourusers to be 100% conformant, weprefare user requirements • Testingwas very usefull (forbothsides) and thereis a stronginterest to solveallchallenges. MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017

  17. Thankyouforyourattention • jiri.polacek@cuzk.cz • www.cuzk.cz MIG-T face-to-face meeting ISPRA 2017 Stránka 17

More Related