1 / 9

Report on the Need for a National Address Database

Report on the Need for a National Address Database. National Address Database Subcommittee NGAC Web Meeting December 3, 2012. National Geospatial Advisory Committee. 1. Introduction and FGDC Guidance. FGDC requested a white paper addressing:

jcedillo
Download Presentation

Report on the Need for a National Address Database

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Report on the Need for a National Address Database National Address Database Subcommittee NGAC Web Meeting December 3, 2012 National Geospatial Advisory Committee

  2. 1. Introduction and FGDC Guidance • FGDC requested a white paper addressing: • Need for a National Address Database and the benefits and potential savings and efficiencies that will be realized • Potential concerns about a National Address Database, including privacy issues • Possible approaches for development of a National Address Database, including the roles of federal, state, local, and tribal governments, commercial partners, and other stakeholders

  3. 2. Vision: Key Focus Areas • Current, accurate nationwide address data, in open formats, are critical to the provision of services provided by all levels of government • Need a National Address Database as a single repository for storing, aggregating and sharing essential address information • The current paper to focus on point location addresses

  4. 3. Need for National Address Database • Support emergency response and public safety • Improve government services • Defragment current address systems • Achieve real and potential cost savings • Identify and claim unrealized (secondary) benefits

  5. 4. Potential Concerns • Census (Title 13) and USPS (Title 39) limits on sharing address data • Addresses and public privacy • Census and USPS data homologation • Military addresses • Accuracy considerations

  6. 5. National Address Database Development Options • Current practices • Best practices • Workflows and the role of government and the private sector • Development options

  7. 5.4 Development Options • Option 1: Single Steward • Option 2: Multiple Stewards • Option 3: Modify Existing Processes • Option 4: Leverage Existing Programs • Option 5: State-based Integration And Coordination • Hybrid: Combine Options

  8. 6. Conclusion • Recommend creation of a National Address Database • With contributions from and access by all sectors of the economy • Recommend aggregation and integration of local address data • Recommend formal benefit-cost analysis to identify best development option

  9. 7. Chronology • 10/26: Captured NGAC comments during joint subcommittee meeting • 11/2: Additional written comments due • 11/13: Work group revised and updated paper • 11/16: Distribute revised paper to NGAC • 12/3: Review at NGAC public webinar meeting • 12/3: Vote on adoption

More Related