1 / 35

Joint Action to Support Micro-Finance Institutions in Europe

JASMINE:. Joint Action to Support Micro-Finance Institutions in Europe. Philippe Delvaux - DG REGIO, Financial Engineering. “Train the trainers” European Commission seminar for managing and certifying authorities Brussels, 9 June 2009. Background Micro-credit initiative JASMINE.

jbrassfield
Download Presentation

Joint Action to Support Micro-Finance Institutions in Europe

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. JASMINE: Joint Action to Support Micro-Finance Institutions in Europe Philippe Delvaux - DG REGIO, Financial Engineering “Train the trainers” European Commission seminar for managingand certifying authorities Brussels, 9 June 2009

  2. Background • Micro-credit initiative • JASMINE

  3. SMEs are the backbone of the European Economy • 23 millionSMEs in Europe, representing99%of all businesses in the EU • SMEs provide about2/3of all private sector jobs in the EU • SMEs are responsible for almost all net job creation in the EU • SMEs are a major factor of regional, economic and social cohesion

  4. > 250 employees 9 255 50 - 250 employees 1 693 10 - 49 employees 0 - 9 employees 21 228 Informal sector (Income-generating activities) Number of enterprises in the EU (x 1000) 23,2 million enterprises in EU 25 92% of enterprises in Europe are micro-enterprises (0 – 9 employees) Informal sector represents 10 to 15% of GDP Active population below the poverty line : 28 million µC

  5. Small businesses are top priorityof Cohesion Policy 2007-2013 • Cohesion policy strongly supports the Lisbon Agenda goals of growth and jobs • Cohesion Policy is the biggest provider of EU funds supporting Small Businesses • Total business support 2007-2013:€ 55.000.000.000 • of which >50% is directly targeted to support for small businesses, including micro-businesses

  6. 12% / €3.2bn 65% / €17.7bn 14% / €3.7bn 9% / €2.5bn € 27 billion of support specifically dedicated to Small Businesses

  7. JEREMIE and Micro-credit JEREMIE:A new financial engineering instrument designed in the framework of the new regulations on Structural Funds • to improve access to finance for SMEs and micro-enterprises in the Member States and regions • to create financial leverage using risk and loan based instruments, guarantees, etc., and their combination • to help managing authorities responsible for European programmes to reach that goal JEREMIEcan be used to improve the provision of micro-credit in the European Union

  8. EC’s definitionof micro-credit Max. Amount : € 25.000 Number of staff 1 – 9 Max. turnover : € 2.0 Mio

  9. Why do we need to do more for micro-credit? • An important gap in the market • A high potential demand for micro-credit estimated to some700 000loans amounting to some€ 6 billion • Potential entrepreneurs with no collateral cannot obtain loans through traditional channels • Not enough micro-credit intermediaries providing mentoring on the market

  10. Why can’t this be left to the traditional banking sector only? • Access to finance is a real problem for those who are considered non-bankable customers • Banks usually provide access to finance for existing micro-enterprises and traditional start-ups • They are reluctant to deal with those who lack collateral, steady employment or a verifiable credit history, although the default rate on micro-loans is quite low • Operational costs are not proportionate to the size of the micro-loan • Not enough micro-credit intermediaries providing mentoring on the market

  11. Background • Micro-credit initiative • JASMINE

  12. Why a micro-credit initiative? • Several actions have already been taken at EU level and in Member States to support micro-credit (CIP, ESF, EQUAL, PHARE, …), but this is not enough to allow forsustainable development of micro-credit in Europe • Micro-credit operations need to be seen in a broad support framework in line with the principle of subsidiarity • A more favourable environment is essential => COM/2007/708 of 13 November 2007

  13. What is the purpose of the micro-credit initiative? • To promote a favourable legal and institutional and environment for micro-credit in Europe • To help non-bank financial intermediaries who want to act on the micro-credit scene reach a high standard in terms of governance and lending practices • To help them raise funds on the private capital market and attract borrowers in confidence • To help them grow and reach sustainability

  14. What is the Commission now proposing to do? (1) • Promote a more favourable legal and institutional environment for micro-credit • Invite Member States to adapt national institutional and legal frameworks as appropriate • Encourage Member States to adopt quantitative targets and to report on implementation in the framework of the annual Lisbon cycle.

  15. Examples of changes to the legal and institutional environment • Development of micro-credit providers/MFIs • Relaxing interest caps for micro-credit operations • Allowing MFIs access to borrower databases and facilitating their evaluation of the risks • Reducing operating costs applying favourable tax schemes • Adapting national regulation • Ensuring single market rules are applied to micro-credit • Incorporating micro-credit into regulation and accounting standards

  16. What is the Commission now proposing to do? (2) • Encourage Member States to further entrepreneurship. • Set up, in inter-institutional partnership with the European Investment Bank group, a European facility, to provide technical support and funding to non-bank micro-credit providers/MFIs

  17. Background • Micro-credit initiative • JASMINE

  18. JASMINE(Joint Action to Support Micro-finance INstitutions in Europe) A joint initiative of the European Commission and the EIB Group launched on 10 September 2008 in Nice • to channel various forms of technical and financial support to selected non-bank micro-credit providers/Micro-finance Institutions (MFIs) • to help MFIs improve the quality of their operations, to expand and become sustainable • to promote best practices in the field of micro-credit lending

  19. Two main issues: • Providing to Micro-credit providers/MFIs • Operationaltechnical assistancefor capacity building (mentoring, training, information, toolkits, etc. ) • General support measures like evaluation and rating of MFIs, drafting a code of conduct, designing a quality label, etc. • Providingflexible fundingto selected MFIs (equity, loans, guarantees or their combination) through a co-financing facility established in the EIF and involving EIB, European Parliament, Commission, private or public financial partners, MAs(+/- € 50 m)

  20. Important practical elements • Need for acode of good conductfor MFIs to spread ethical and customer-friendly best practices among MFIs. • Specialized rating agencies to swot the potential of MFIs by and provideassessment and rating • On the ground trainingby practitioners or networks of practitioners • Designing aquality labelfor micro-credit which will be awarded under strict conditions to MFIs to acknowledge their reliability • Provision ofstart-up equityto help MFIs cover their operational costs and become sustainable. • Launching apilot projectto gain experience in delivering funds and support to non-bank micro-credit providers

  21. Drafting a code of good conduct for MFIs Purpose : • Create a business reference • Streamline practices • Provide lending security • Facilitate quality assessment and refinancing operations • Prepare for rating • … in co-operation with banking sector

  22. Assesment/rating methodology (example) Elements to be assessed : • Governance (e.g. 24%) • Information System and data quality (e.g. 10%) • Risk management (e.g. 10%) • Activities : Portfolio management (e.g. 20%) • Funding and liquidity (e.g. 14%) • Efficiency and profitability (e.g. 22%)

  23. Designing a quality label for MFIs Criteria : • Good governance • Financial performance • Social performance • Results compliant with business plan • Distance to sustainability • Risk management • Rating (e.g. B onwards) • …

  24. JASMINE

  25. Financing aspects A 3 pillar approach : • Technical support (capacity building) • Seed capital • Repayable funding (lending operations) • …

  26. Funding at a glance • Method: Co-financing • Target : primarily non-banking MFIs close to sustainability (e.g. : new branches of well-established MFIs, young and more mature MFIs) • Initial phase: 20 – 30 MFIs to be funded over 3 years • Area: 27 Member States • 3-year pilot phase funding :+/- EUR 50 m • Financial instruments for MFIs: mainly short-term to medium-term loans, guarantees, equity / quasi-equity, technical assistance, non-repayable assistance, … • Investors: (EU, EIB, EP, private and public banks, regions, etc..)

  27. Nextsteps • Practical set-up of JASMINE, (implementation in Q3 2009) • Start of a 3-year pilot phase to identify best practices in the field of micro-credit with selected “model” non-bank micro-credit providers to prepare scaling up of operations • Finding ways to improve the micro-credit environment in the European Union • Promotion of micro-credit through JEREMIE Holding Funds

  28. Conclusions

  29. The Curve of Change Performance Integration / Moving on 7 Confusion / Denial 1 Anger / Blame / 2 Questions Acceptance 6 Bargaining 3 Testing 5 Depression 4 Decreasing stress Positive growth Period of loss Increasing stress Time

  30. Conclusions (1/3) • Developing the provision of micro-credit in the EU is a challenging undertaking which understates a process of change • It is however not a single man’s job. It involves a large number of stakeholders • Is not solely a financial issue as well. It also requires appropriate and qualified intermediaries

  31. Conclusions (2/3) • In this respect, MFIs seem better positioned than banks to help non-bankable entrepreneurs start their business • JASMINE will seek to develop the potential of micro-credit providers and to make adequate funding available to them • JASMINE will seek to foster as much synergies as possible between the actors on the micro-credit scene

  32. Conclusions (3/3) • Partnership between banks and MFIs needs to be encouraged, as it can be a win-win undertaking for all. • The Lisbon Agenda, the micro-credit initiative of the Commission, the Small Business Act, the Becsey-Report and the financial crisis offer a unique framework to improve the micro-credit environment in Europe

  33. A few stakeholders… • Member States (improve the micro-credit environment), • Regions (local development, fight against exclusion), • The Commission (Cohesion Policy, JEREMIE, JASMINE, Guarantee window of the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme, SBA, …), • The European Parliament (political action, financial support), • The European Investment Bank Group (financial expertise, fund raising and leverage effect), • Banks, Savings banks (expertise, social responsibility, funding, best practices) • Micro-finance Networks (on the ground knowledge, dissemination of information, best practices), • Private and public investors, retail banks (funding and expertise), • Rating Agencies (Evaluation, commercial rating) • Donors, • You.

  34. Thank you for your attention • For further Information Website: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/funds/2007/jjj/micro_en.htm Email: REGIO-FINANCIAL-ENGINEERING@ec.europa.eu DG REGIO – Unit D3 –Financial Engineering

More Related