1 / 30

Discussions about Z effects on the Conti scenario Geneva, 1983

Discussions about Z effects on the Conti scenario Geneva, 1983. Peter sitting on pure Z=1 materials in Arapahoe Peak Boulder, 1989. Peter during a bicycle trip Geneva 2002. Peter with some of his many disciples… Boulder, 2003. MASSIVE STARS EVOLUTION. in collaboration with :

javier
Download Presentation

Discussions about Z effects on the Conti scenario Geneva, 1983

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Discussions about Z effects on the Conti scenario Geneva, 1983

  2. Peter sitting on pure Z=1 materials in Arapahoe Peak Boulder, 1989

  3. Peter during a bicycle trip Geneva 2002

  4. Peter with some of his many disciples… Boulder, 2003

  5. MASSIVE STARS EVOLUTION in collaboration with : Georges Meynet Raphael Hirschi (Univ. Keele) Patrick Eggenberger (Univ. Liege) Sylvia Ekström Cyril Georgi

  6. MASSIVE STARS: High T Low  MASS LOSS : MIXING: shear ~ thermal diffusivity Mass loss and mixing strongly favoured !

  7. Both effects interact: • Mass loss removes angular momentum • Rotation enhances the M- loss rates • STRUCTURE • Oblateness • MASS LOSS • Enhanced winds • Anisotropies • MIXING • Meridional circul. • Shears • Hzt. turbulence Rotation in B stars Huang & Gies (2006); see also Conti & Ebbets 1977 - Peak of Vrot = 200 km/s

  8. ROTATIONAL DISTORTION ACHERNAR ~9.6 Msol Domiciano de Souza et al. 2003 : difficulty ? Carciofi et al. 2008: equatorial disk Re/Rp=1.5 ROCHE MODEL OK for ω =0.992

  9. Von Zeipel (1924) Frad geff  Teff ~ geff 1/4

  10. Altair 1.8 Msol ω =0.9 GRAVITY DARKENING Teff(pole)/Teff(equateur)=1.23-1.27 Confirmation of Von Zeipel Peterson et al. 2006 Monnier et al. 2007 The exponent may be smaller ~0.19 Monnier, 2007

  11. STELLAR WINDS & ROTATION Owocki 1996, Maeder, 1999 Enables a massive star to lose lots of mass and little angular momentum  GRBs iso mass loss

  12. ACHERNAR HAS POLAR WINDS 9.6 Msol Ve=470 km/s ~91% Vcrit Mass of the disk =4.1 10-10Msol Mass loss =1.3 10-8 Msol/y Polar mass flux 7 10-9 Msol y-1 sr-1 Disk in Keplerian rotation Meilland et al. 2007 Intensity map in the continuum at 2.15 micron (SIMECA code)

  13. (N/H) depend on • v sin i • M • age • Z, etc… SURFACE ENRICHMENTS

  14. Stars in extended regions around N11 and NGC 2004 in the LMC. Spread in masses and ages. Sample biased toward low v sini « The observation challenges the concept of rotational mixing » Hunter et al. 2008

  15. One must not assumelog (N/H) = f(v sini) But log (N/H) = f(v sini, M, age, Z….) Mass effect Age effect end of MS phase beginning of MS phase

  16. MS stars between 14 and 20 MO in the list by Hunter et al. 2008 Gr I disappeared, except binaries lower M (~12 MO instead of 17 MO) Gr II : evolved stars • It would be useful • to account for • gravity darkening • in v sin i • to separate gravity • effects due to rot. • and evolution • in M determinations

  17. ABUNDANCES: Galaxy: [N/H] for O-stars : ~ 0.5 up to 0.8-1.0 dex < 20 M  B – dwarfs : ~ 0.5 dex > 20 M  B – giants , supg. : ~0.5 -0.7 dex Ref: Villamariz & Herrero ’02; Smartt ’02;Herrero’03;Venn & Przybilla03;Trundle et al.’07 LMC: [N/H] for B-supg. : ~ 0.3 - 0.8 dex < 20 M  B – dwarfs : ~ 0.7- 0.9 dex B – giants, supg. :  1.1 -1.2 dex > 20 M  B – giants , supg. :  1.3 dex Ref: Herrero’03;Trundle et al. ’07;Hunter et al.’07 SMC: [N/H] O-stars, A-F supg. : 1.5 -1.7 dex < 20 M  B – dwarfs :  1.1 dex B – giants, supg. :  1.5 dex > 20 M  B – giants , supg :  1.9 dex Ref: Heap & Lanz’06; Venn & Przybilla’03; Bouret et al.’03;Trundle et al.’07; Hunter et al.’07

  18. Gradients of  steeper at lower metallicity 20 MO More efficient mixing of the chemical elements at lower Z MM’ 01

  19. 60 Msol, Z = 0.00001 2/3 of the Main Sequence phase spent near the break-up limit

  20. MASS LOSS DUE TO THE APPROACH OF THE BREAK-UP LIMIT Z=10-8 300 km/s End MS 800 km/s ! Solar Z  radiative M - loss Low Z stars  rotational M-loss Age in Myr

  21. Zsurf/Zini=1 Zsurf/Zini=64 14N Yc= 0.12 12C Yc= 0.40 16O Zsurf/Zini=392 Zsurf/Zini=1336 Yc= 0.08 Z=10-8 Yc= 0.02

  22. ΔY/ΔZ= 70-130 Also, ΔY/ΔZ > 70, cf.  CenMaeder & Meynet 2006

  23. Most extreme stars Continuous line: models at Z=10-5 (MM02) Broken line: the same with larger N yield Red: new models with fast rotation belowZ=10-5 Chiappini, Hirschi, Meynet, Ekström, Maeder., Matteucci 2006 Confirmed by Fabbian, Nissen, Asplund, Pettini, Ackerman 2008

  24. Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) Collapsar model (Woosley 1993) Massive star collapsing in a fast spinning BH • Composition: from SNIbc • (WC-WO stars) • Rotation: J > 1016 cm2 s-1 • Statistics: ~1GRB /1000 SN • more at lower Z (up to SMC) • Le Floch et al. 2003;Stanek et al. 2006 Georgy et al. 2008

  25. GRBs Difficulty: remove M without loosing too much angular momentum  homogeneous evolution Avoid the red MM 2006 Yoon & Langer 2005; cf. Maeder, 1987 - Homogeneous evolution. Possible, but composition not corresponding !

  26. Anisotropic winds • keep high rotation • more M loss 0 2 4 (106yr) Meynet & Maeder 2006 Angular momentum in the central 3 MO = 8 x 1016 cm2 s-1 while j= 1016 cm2 s-1 is the limit.

  27. Evolution of All Stellar Generations = f (M, Z, He, mass loss, rotation, binaries, magn. field, ……) • Lifetimes, tracks • Asteroseismology • Evolution properties Be, B[e], • LBV, WR stars in galaxies • Nebulae • Evolution of rotation • Cepheid properties • Surface abundances in massive • stars and red giants • Primary N • Pre – supernova stages • Yields and nucleosynthesis • Rotation periods of pulsars • Final masses • Collapsars, γ- bursts, ….

More Related