1 / 9

A Methodology for Malware Evaluation

A Methodology for Malware Evaluation. Student: Hsun -Yi Tsai Advisor: Dr. Kuo -Chen Wang National Chiao Tung University. Outline. Introduction Background Problem Statement Prototype Conclusion References. Introduction.

jarvis
Download Presentation

A Methodology for Malware Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Methodology for Malware Evaluation Student: Hsun-Yi Tsai Advisor: Dr. Kuo-Chen Wang National Chiao Tung University

  2. Outline Introduction Background Problem Statement Prototype Conclusion References

  3. Introduction • In recent years, malware has been severe threats to the cyber security • Virus, Worms, Trojan horse, Bot … • Anti-Virus • Zero day malware might result in false negative • Behavior analysis might result in false positive • Propose an algorithm for malware evaluation

  4. Background • Sandbox • Virtual machine • Records every single behavior the malware made

  5. Background (Cont.)

  6. Problem Statement • Given • Several sandbox • m known malwares Mj= {M1,M2, …, Mm} • l anti-virus software AVi= {AV1, AV2, …, AVl} • Objective • n rules Rk= {R1,R2, …, Rn} • n coefficients Ak= {A1,A2, …, An} • A1R1 + A2R2 + … +AnRn

  7. Prototype

  8. Conclusion Propose an evaluating algorithm for malware samples The rules used in the algorithm could be added to the behavior analysis portion of toolchain

  9. References [1] Bayer, U., MilaniComparetti, P., Hlauschek, C., Krugel, C.,andKirda, E. 2009. Scalable, Behavior-Based Malware Clustering. In 16th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS09) [2] Lee, T. and Mody, J. J. 2006. Behavioral Classification . In European Institute for Computer Antivirus Research Conference (EICAR) [3] Moser, A., Kruegel, C., and Kirda, E. 2007. Exploring Multiple Execution Paths for Malware Analysis. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Oakland. [4] Norman Sandbox 2003. Norman SandBox Whitepaper. http://download.norman.no/whitepaper/whitepaper_Norman_SandBox.pdf [5] Rieck, K., Holz, T., Willems, C., Dussel, P., and Laskov, P. 2008. Learning and Classification of Malawre Behavior. In Detection of Intrusions and Malware, and Vulnerability Assessment, 5th International Conference (DIMVA). 108-125 [6] Willems, C., Holz, T., and Freiling, F. 2007. Toward Automated Dynamic Malware Analysis Using CWSandbox. IEEE Security and Privacy 5, 2, 32-39 [7] A. Acharya, M. Raje. 1999. MAPbox: Using Parameterized Behavior Classes to Confine Applications. University of California at Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, CA, USA [8] Jana, S., Porter, D.E., Shmatikov, V. 2011. TxBox: Building Secure, Efficient Sandboxes with System Transactions. In IEEE Security and Privacy (SP) Symposium. [9] GFI Sandbox. http://www.gfi.com/malware-analysis-tool

More Related