1 / 19

F. Ronald Denham, Chair Water & Sanitation Rotarian Action Group, October 2012

Searching for sustainable impact in Rotary WASH programs. F. Ronald Denham, Chair Water & Sanitation Rotarian Action Group, October 2012. Background. Fewer than 30% of hand pumps still function after five years (UNICEF study)

jared
Download Presentation

F. Ronald Denham, Chair Water & Sanitation Rotarian Action Group, October 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Searching for sustainable impact in Rotary WASH programs F. Ronald Denham, Chair Water & Sanitation Rotarian Action Group, October 2012

  2. Background • Fewer than 30% of hand pumps still function after fiveyears (UNICEF study) • Many biosand filters no longer effective after six months (UNC study) • Uganda National Development Plan states functionality of rural water systems in western region is less than 50% • A large number of Rotary water projects described as “rehabilitation” implies failure of original investment Many humanitarian undertakings fail to deliver on their promise:

  3. Background • “Of 2000 wells drilled in this country during the past five years, fewer than 1000 still operate.” (Director of Water, Government of Ghana) • Major water kiosk initiative in Abidjan a failure – none of the kiosks still function • Piped water systems destroyed by theft of valves, connectors, etc. Many other anecdotes imply millions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of hours wasted in non-sustainable WASH initiatives: sus.tain’abil’i.ty - noun continuity of service over a period of time; permanent beneficial change

  4. Background Many possible causes of failure: • No sense of “community ownership” • Failure to build on, complement, local culture and values. • Community cannot afford on-going cost • Technology inappropriate • Construction quality compromised • Over-extraction, failure to re-charge water table • Inadequate training , lack of trained people • No systematic monitoring of process, and feedback

  5. Background • Many of these causes stem from a limited vision of the project as an end in itself, not as an integral part of a broader, holistic program: • Provide a water well for community in El Salvador • Provide water tanks for 160 houses in Brazil • Provide five boreholes to community in Burkina Faso • Provide a pipeline for village in Kenya • Provide reinforced concrete cistern

  6. Envisage the typical Rotary WASH project Inputs Activity Output Results • International partner R.C. decides to do a WASH project • Contacts Host club • Request Matching Grant • Agreement with local NGO/CBO • Invite local community input

  7. The focus is on the activity Inputs Activity Output Results • Dig well • Supply filter • Construct latrine • Install RWH • Drill borehole • Build dams

  8. Hoping for these outputs or results: Inputs Activity Output Results • Safe, clean water • Functioning latrine • Saving the rainwater • Local access to water • Dam completed • Sanitation facility

  9. But the community is expecting much more, a programhaving a significant impact on their life and livelihood: Socioeconomicgoals - vision Inputs Activity Outcomes Impacts Output Results Project Program

  10. It implies a broader scope: Project Integrate with complementaryfunctions • Community development • Financial management • Behaviour change • Training, skill development • Capacity building • Commercial channels • Local authorities • NGOs • etc.

  11. And an extended time horizon: Project • Vision for community • Feedback • Mid-course correction • Adapt to change • Integrated learnings • Life cycle costing • Valid business case • Appropriate metrics Extend time horizon Integrate with complementaryfunctions • Community development • Financial management • Behaviour change • Training, skill development • Capacity building • Commercial channels • Local authorities • NGOs • etc.

  12. To develop an integrated, holistic program having real impact on the people and their community: Project • Vision for community • Feedback • Mid-course correction • Adapt to change • Integrated learnings • Life cycle costing • Valid business case • Appropriate metrics Extend time horizon Integrate with complementaryfunctions • Community development • Financial management • Behaviour change • Training, skill development • Capacity building • Commercial channels • Local authorities • NGOs • etc. Integrated Program!

  13. A sustainable program implies a more rigorous start-up: Output Results Inputs Activity Outcomes Impacts • The community • Baseline data • Collaborators/partners: - Host & International RCs - TRF • - NGOs - Local authority - Outside funders • Skills/know-how - Technology - Facilitation • Regulations, policies • Environmental Issues • Gender issues

  14. And much more emphasis on “software”: Output Results Inputs Activity Outcomes Impacts • Create teams • Build capacity • Needs assessment • Identify appropriate technologies • Life-cycle costing/affordability • Design/plan project • Build, construct, implement • Identify business opportunities • Design monitoring systems

  15. The outputs are the means to deliver sustainability Output Results Inputs Activity Outcomes Impacts • Functioning system • Appropriate tariff structure • Management structure & processes • Valid quality & performance measures • Adequate flow of funds • WASH people trained, empowered and accept responsibility • Viable business enterprise

  16. The focus of the program should be tangible outcomes over time: Output Results Inputs Activity Outcomes Impacts • Community of people capable of making change for the better • Women create economic value • Better attendance at schools especially girls • Business and commercial activity • Better health, less disease • Feedback on performance • Advocacy for change

  17. The community should have the capacity to sustain growth and improvement in life and livelihood: Output Results Inputs Activity Outcomes Impacts Entire community moves up the ladder of self-improvement and sustainability • A basis for other programs (education, health, etc.) • Reduction of poverty • Food security • Less conflict • Enhanced economic value

  18. Programs are more than just “Big Projects” - there are fundamental differences: Programs • Outcomes, community impact • 5 – 10 years • Long-term commitment • Major international agencies, • Private sector investment • Professional, full-time, train and leverage volunteers • “Owns” the program • Empowered • Delegation to field to permit flexibility, responsiveness • Accountable for achieving outcomes Focus Duration Funding Management CommunityInvolvement Decision making & control

  19. Conclusions • We will soon eradicate Polio. • The world sees Rotary as a leading humanitarian organization. • “What’s next?”. • Small projects will never sustain Rotary’s image. • Significant, global programs in the Areas of Focus will build on that image and strengthen the Rotary brand. • “Think Programs” should become our new mantra. Wasrag is here to support that mission

More Related