1 / 39

Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement

Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement. 16th May 2011. Outline. Introductions Presentation of the AUGS High level plan Consultations/presenting to industry Allocation of Unidentified Gas Understanding of the problem Proposed methodology Summary / Q&A Future Meetings AOB.

jared
Download Presentation

Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Allocation of Unidentified Gas Statement 16th May 2011

  2. Outline • Introductions • Presentation of the AUGS • High level plan • Consultations/presenting to industry • Allocation of Unidentified Gas • Understanding of the problem • Proposed methodology • Summary / Q&A • Future Meetings • AOB

  3. What is GL? • GL is a world class technical • assurance and consulting company and • leading ship classification society. • Three business areas: • Maritime Services • Renewables – GL Garrad Hassan • Oil And Gas – GL Noble Denton

  4. GL Noble Denton - Our Heritage Originally formed as the Research and Development Group of British Gas With the re-structuring of British Gas our name changed to BG Technology and acquired Transco Engineering Services & Transco Technical Training in 1997 In 2001 we acquired Risx and Stoner Associates Inc. and became Advantica In 2007 Advantica was acquired by Germanischer Lloyd

  5. GL Noble Denton has become a leading global advisor to the Oil & Gas industry Oil & Gas assets 3,000 Employees in35 Countries Poland Russia Kasachstan Italy MODU Pipelines Subsea Installations MOPU Offshore Structures Onshore Facilities Norway China Korea UK Thailand Philippines Vietnam Singapore Canada USA Mexico Germany Tunisia Libya Egypt Trinidad Oman Peru Brazil Brunei Indonesia Australia India Saudi Arabia UAE Pakistan Kuwait Malaysia Qatar Iran Bahrain Competencies along the whole asset life cycle GL Noble Denton comprises experts from: Technical Assurance • Verification, Certification and Classification • Industrial Inspection Marine Consulting & Operations • Marine Warranty • Marine Consulting, Vetting & Surveys, Marine Operations • Marine Casualty Investigation • Dynamic Positioning Advanced Engineering & Consulting • Adv. Analysis & Eng. Consulting • Field Development Planning • Testing Services • Asset Integrity Mgmt / Optimization • Safety & Risk • Software Solutions Project Execution • Project Management • Design • Transportation & Installation • Due Diligence • Construction Monitoring

  6. Conflicts of Interest • GL Noble Denton is independent of all UK industry bodies • GL Noble Denton have not previously been involved with this particular unidentified gas problem • One of our core values is to be “the most respected international technical advisor and trusted partner” for all our clients • Our objectives are simple – to devise a methodology that is unbiased, meets the requirements of the industry bodies and is approved by the UNCC

  7. Overview of Project Plan

  8. High Level Plan

  9. Presenting to the UNCC The AUGS covers • Adherence to AUGE Guidelines terms of reference • Proposed topics for unidentified gas and their status • Data provision status/issues • AUGE Methodology • Reasoning • Assumptions • Data Used • Issues/recommendations going forward • For incomplete aspects of the methodology (e.g. pending data) the AUGS contains details of the remaining steps to complete it • Consultation questions and responses as appropriate

  10. Reporting Progress • Primarily through the main UNCC presentations and publications of AUGS • There is also visibility of activities from data requests and responses to consultation questions • In addition, brief progress reports will be provided via JO website

  11. Consultations Industry Bodies issues/questions • GL Noble Denton • present answers via • AUGS • Industry meetings • JO website GL Noble Denton Industry Bodies issues/questions • Collate • Compare vs criteria • Investigate / assess • Generate responses • Update methodology • Update AUGS Questions/issues can be raised via AUGE@gl-group.com

  12. Unidentified Gas – The Problem

  13. Unidentified Gas – Understanding of the Problem • The AUGE • Robust and repeatable algorithm • Estimates of Unidentified Gas that are • Accurate • Unbiased • Unidentified Gas estimation is the core of the consultation/publication process

  14. Unidentified Gas – Statement of the Problem • UK gas market sectors • Daily Metered (DM) • Non-Daily Metered Larger Supply Points (NDM LSP) • Smaller Supply Points (SSP) • Threshold between SSP and LSP is 73,200kWh pa

  15. Unidentified Gas – Statement of the Problem • Additional factors: • LDZ Shrinkage • Leakage • Own Use Gas • Transporter-Responsible Theft • Unidentified Gas • Both unknown, both have to be estimated

  16. Unidentified Gas – Statement of the Problem • Unidentified Gas • Unregistered and Shipperless sites • Independent Gas Transporter CSEP Setup and Registration Delays • Corrections to the shrinkage estimate • Shipper-responsible theft • Potential additional sources of Unidentified Gas • LDZ offtake meter errors • Supply point meter errors • These only apply if there is a long-term metering bias

  17. Unidentified Gas – Statement of the Problem • Calculation of Unidentified Gas • Understand process flow • Location of UG at each stage of the calculation • Calculate UG at optimal process stage • Directly • By subtraction • Time frame covered by individual UG calculations • Daily (aggregate results to annual level for UNC table) • Monthly (aggregate results to annual level for UNC table) • Annual

  18. Unidentified Gas – Statement of the Problem • Previous UNC Modification Proposals • 194/194A • Gave framework for quantifying Unidentified Gas • Relied on set percentages of RbD or set values • 228/228A • Populated framework with set percentages (228) or set values (228A) • No provision for year-on-year updates at this stage • Potential areas for improvement • Both carry assumption that all or most of RbD is Unidentified Gas • Recognition of allocation algorithm error

  19. Unidentified Gas – Statement of the Problem • The AUGE is independent and impartial • Modification 229 allows UG estimates to be updated every year • No UNC amendments required • Estimates from the AUGE circulated and agreed prior to implementation

  20. Unidentified Gas – The Solution

  21. Unidentified Gas – The Solution Daily Allocation Process • Based on End User Categories • Trained on metered data • Minimum 3900 Small NDM, 1600 Large NDM supply points • 2010 analysis actually used a total of 12715 supply points • Estimates raw (metered demand) – i.e. no Unidentified Gas • Scaled up to meet LDZ load (minus Shrinkage and DM load) • Scaling process introduces Unidentified Gas • Value unknown • Split between EUCs by AQ

  22. Unidentified Gas – The Solution Composition of allocation estimate • Actual EUC load • Model error (can be positive or negative) • Unidentified Gas (always positive) • Each EUC total known, but composition unknown

  23. Unidentified Gas – The Solution Final calculation steps • Aggregate to SSP and NDM LSP level • SSP corresponds to one EUC • NDM LSP is the sum of the remaining EUCs • This is the basis for initial (deemed) load allocation • Actual NDM LSP (monthly) meter reads become available • Apply Reconciliation by Difference • NDM LSP load now accurate • Model error eliminated • SSP allocation is now actual SSP load plus Unidentified Gas • SSP/UG split unknown

  24. Unidentified Gas – The Solution

  25. Unidentified Gas – The Solution Unidentified Gas Estimation • Location known, UG accumulated into one figure • Estimate should now be made • Recommended approach – calculate each component directly • Calculation granularity is part of analysis

  26. Unidentified Gas – Individual Elements

  27. Unidentified Gas – Data Requirements • Site AQs (for all DM, LSP and SSP sites) • Actual daily loads (DM sites) • Profiled daily loads (from meter reads for LSP NDM sites) • Deemed daily loads (LSP NDM and SSP sites) • RbD quantities • LDZ Shrinkage (calculated) • Plus data for • Unregistered and shipperless sites • IGT CSEP setup and registration delays • LDZ shrinkage initial and final estimates • Theft (including information on anti-theft initiatives)

  28. Unidentified Gas – Unregistered/Shipperless Sites • Unregistered Sites • Opening meter reading taken when site is registered • If this is not zero, Unregistered gas has been taken • Shipperless Sites • Closing meter reading taken when site is unregistered • Opening meter reading taken when site is registered • If they differ, Shipperless gas has been taken • This gets assigned to SSP sector via RbD • Potential impact of Mod 369

  29. Unidentified Gas – Unregistered/Shipperless Sites • Unregistered Sites – Shipper Activity/Orphaned • Data has been requested splitting these into “meter”/”no meter” categories • Determine proportion with meter that actually flow gas before they are registered • Analyse all opening meter readings to derive percentage non-zero • Apply this proportion to “meter” group • All sites in this group are more than 12 months old, hence unregistered consumption = AQ • Unregistered Sites – Sites Created <12 Months • Proportion flowing gas the same as for Shipper Activity/Orphaned sites • Assume that rates of new sites getting MPRNs and sites with MPRNs becoming registered are both steady • Sites will, on average, have been taking gas for half the time period in question • Report currently semi-monthly, hence average time taking gas is one month

  30. Unidentified Gas – Unregistered/Shipperless Sites • Shipperless Sites – Passed To Shipper • Only sites visited after being shipperless for more than 12 months are reported • More sites will have been shipperless for less than 12 months- those flowing gas are still contributing to Unidentified Gas • Relevant data requested from Xoserve - all shipperless sites (including <12 months) - all >12 month sites visited (not just those found to be flowing gas) • Calculate “still flowing gas” rate from site visit data • Apply to <12 month sites • Carry out final calculation - all >12 month sites in report have been flowing gas for full 12 months - the <12 months sites still flowing gas will have been doing so for an average of 6 months • Shipperless Sites – Shipper Specific Report • Calculations as above

  31. Unidentified Gas – Unregistered/Shipperless Sites • No Activity • Sites currently being processed • These will end up in one of the other categories • Split between those categories pro-rata before calculations carried out • Legitimately Unregistered • These sites are believed to have no meter • Hence they do no contribute to Unidentified Gas

  32. Unidentified Gas – IGT CSEP Registration Delays • Within CSEPs, sites cannot take gas without being registered • UG from this source comes from unregistered CSEPs only • Entire network not registered on Xoserve system • Regular meetings held with IGTs • Report on statistics • 32000 CSEPs • Approximately 1200 are currently unregistered • Down from 3000 in 2009 • Get average CSEP composition from known (registered) CSEPs • Apply to unknown population to estimate consumption

  33. Unidentified Gas – Shipper-Responsible Theft • Data available for • Detected theft • Alleged theft • These are high and low limits for true theft • Two-yearly meter inspections ensure that unknown theft (ie theft that exists but has never been alleged) is limited • Changes in theft detection rates when shipper initiatives take place can be used to estimate likely value of true theft between upper and lower limits • It is recognised that true theft is very difficult to pinpoint • Final value will be one agreed to be reasonable by all parties

  34. Unidentified Gas – Shrinkage Error • Difference between initial estimate and final estimate of shrinkage • Can be positive or negative • Shrinkage calculated as defined in UNC • Most accurate models available are used • National Leakage Tests • Own Use Gas model • Standard Theft assumptions • Final shrinkage values recalculated after the event and RbD credited • Hence error of initial (pre-year) estimate already accounted for in process

  35. Unidentified Gas – Meter Error Metering takes place • At LDZ offtakes • At Supply Meter Points • DMs – daily • NDM LSP – usually monthly • SSP – less frequently • Meter errors only have an impact over time if they carry a long term aggregate bias • Potential effects can be positive or negative • If present, this is a correction to RbD rather than Unidentified Gas

  36. Unidentified Gas – Meter Error • SSP meters use a rubber diaphragm • These can warp over time • They are set up to be unbiased on average over their 20-year lifespan • SSP metering does not affect Unidentified Gas calculation anyway • LSP and larger meters use metal components • Regular maintenance • No warping over time • Therefore no long-term bias from this source • Meter error can be discounted from analysis • Backs up conclusions drawn in previous UNC Mods

  37. Unidentified Gas – Unknown Sites • Sites that are taking gas that • Are not registered with a shipper • Do not even have a MPRN • These are unknown to the Xoserve system • Data has been requested on this subject

  38. Summary – Q/A • Any other areas of UG to consider? • Clarifications/Questions? • Can raise further questions/issues post meeting via AUGE@gl-group.com

  39. Thank you for your attention

More Related