1 / 32

KE22 Final Year Project Phase 3

KE22 Final Year Project Phase 3. Modeling and Simulation of Milling Forces SIMTech Project. Ryan Soon, Henry Woo, Yong Boon April 9, 2011 Confidential – Internal Only. Agenda. Objectives.

janet
Download Presentation

KE22 Final Year Project Phase 3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. KE22 Final Year ProjectPhase 3 Modeling and Simulation of Milling Forces SIMTech Project Ryan Soon, Henry Woo, Yong Boon April 9, 2011 Confidential – Internal Only

  2. Agenda

  3. Objectives Understand a prognostic problem domain that enables an Hybrid implementation of Knowledge Engineering Techniques Present research effort & implementation result of overall prognostic problem domain Highlight novel prognostic optimization concept and model Challenges and benefits

  4. Problem Domain Overview • KEY IDEA  Optimizing manufacturing asset and predictive maintenance • What is Milling?  customized material of different shapes and features • What to Optimize  Predict remaining lifespan of cutter • How to Optimize  Implementing a Hybrid KE Model using • Hierarchical Clustering (HC) • Adaptive Neural Fuzzy Inferences System (ANFIS) • Resulting in an optimal HC-ANFIS hybrid • Why Optimal  determine optimal cluster size and automatically produce optimal ANFIS structure

  5. System Description • Machine sensors attached to the milling process • Cutting force sensor in x, y, z dimension • Acoustic emission sensor that measure high frequency stress wave

  6. System Description • 6 cutter tools’ data given • Over 300+ samples given for each cutter • At specific interval • Measure sensors’ readings • Measure tool wear using electronic microscope

  7. System Description • ANFIS by itself can solve the prediction problem • But required expert knowledge on rules determination and membership function • Use HC to determine rules and membership function • By providing optimal cluster size, membership function parameters • How to determine the optimal cluster size of HC • By using cluster balance method • Improve overall learning and application performance • Coded HC module in .NET C# • Coded ANFIS module in Python

  8. Grid Partition with HC approach

  9. Grid Partition with HC Issue • Complexity of the ANFIS structure is based on the product of each input’s cluster size • Given that p, q, r, s represented the cluster size of the 4 force features • ANFIS would generate (p * q * r * s) number of inferences rules • For E.g. if p = q = r = s = 10, then number of inferences rules = 10,000! • This is computationally intensive and infeasible to implement

  10. HC-ANFIS Approach

  11. HC-ANFIS Approach findings • Less rules produced hence a more feasible solution than the previous approach • As the features were combined, much lesser ANFIS inferences rules were created thus resulting in a much lesser intensive computation and a feasible solution to implement

  12. Results

  13. Benefits by organization • HC System • Fast and customizable input selection for different application needs • Customized output, to facilitate future seamless integration between HC and other system • Novel cluster balance implementation to determine optimal HC cluster size • HC-ANFIS System • Provide an alternative automated tool wear prediction method for SimTech sponsor

  14. Benefits by students • Enforce what student learned in course • Knowledge Modeling and Management • Use different techniques (i.e. interview, UML diagrams) and CommonKADS to gather and capture user requirements • Utilize the knowledge learned in class (i.e. Clustering, Fuzzy Inferences System and Neural Network) to come up with a Hybrid system design and final product • Product Development • Understand the underlying principle and math of how Clustering, Fuzzy Inferences System and Neural Network works • Explore and innovate new KE techniques • Understand the importance and usage of the HC and ANFIS application in real world situation • Learned from users on the proper result testing technique • Result must be repeatable and reliable

  15. DEMO • Show capability of • Grid Partition with HC • HC-ANFIS • Subtractive Clustering (MATLAB)

  16. The End Q&A

  17. BACKUP

  18. Problem Description • 3 set of cutter tool data were given • 07, 31, T12 • Belong to the same family type but with differences in drill bit shape and knife edges • Problem domain requires us to build a hybrid KE system to predict the cutter tool wear • Full Microsoft .NET C# implementation of Hybrid KE system • Hierarchical Clustering • Derive number of Fuzzy linguistic values for each variable • Derive number of Fuzzy rules • ANFIS (Neural Fuzzy System) to learn and predict the tool wear • Generic tool wear prediction model

  19. Data Correlation analysis – 1 • And within each cutter tool data • 3 sets of individual tool head data  F1, F2, F3 • Within each “F” data (315 records) • Acoustic emission data (16 features) • Force (x dimension) data (16 features) • Force (y dimension) data (16 features) • Force (y dimension) data (16 features) • Too much features • Use correlation coefficient method and cut down on the features

  20. Data Correlation analysis – 2 AE Fx Fy Fz • By using Pearson Correlation Coefficients, the linear dependence between the measured features values and the tool wear values can be calculated • AE data is not influencing the tool wear strongly • The top influencing features are consistent between the 3 forces

  21. Fuzzy System Identification

  22. Overview of Hierarchical Clustering • Agglomerative HC starts with each object describing a cluster, and then combines them into more inclusive clusters until only one cluster remains. • 4 Main Steps • Construct the finest partition • Compute the distance matrix • DO • Find the clusters with the closest distance • Put those two clusters into one cluster • Compute the distances between the new groups and the remaining groups by recalculated distance to obtain a reduced distance matrix • UNTIL all clusters are agglomerated into one group. • Ward Methods, minimize ESS (Error Sum-Of-Square)

  23. Overview of ANFIS • ANFIS architecture • Premise ANFIS MF(Bell) • Consequence Linear Sugeno • Learning Algorithms

  24. Optimal Hierarchical Clustering • Determine the numbers of clustering using RSS with penalty. Where, is the penalty factor for addition # of cluster. K’ and K = number of clusters RSS = Residual Sum of Squares • Borrow concept from K-means using RSS as goal function.

  25. Hierarchical Clustering + ANFIS • Two Different Approaches for HC + ANFIS • Use HC to determine # of linguistic values for each input features • Use HC to determine # of rules

  26. Optimal Hierarchical Clustering# of Linguistic Variables • Example on SRE variables, opt # of cluster = 3 • Perform HC on selected features on FX

  27. ANFIS Architectures# of Linguistic Variables • ANFIS with 4 inputs variables contains 3~4 linguistics variables generated 192 Rules!

  28. ANFIS – Results# of Linguistic Variables • ANFIS Predict vs Actual • Train Data with Avg Error 4.84 • Test Data with Avg Error 15.00 • Membership Functions • P2p • Std_fea • Sre • fstd

  29. Optimal Hierarchical Clustering# of Rules • Build HC on all variables, opt # of cluster = 5

  30. ANFIS Architectures # of Rules • ANFIS with 4 inputs variables contains 5 linguistics variables and 5 rules. • Each cluster centre is a fuzzy rules!

  31. ANFIS – Results # of Rules • ANFIS Predict vs Actual • Train Data with Avg Error 5.75 • Test Data with Avg Error 15.218 • Membership Functions • P2p • Std_fea • Sre • fstd

  32. What’s next? • Full .NET C# Implementation • Development of Hierarchical Clustering toolset with frontend GUI • Manual range input of number cluster by user • Optimal clustering suggesting the optimal number of cluster • Make use of ANFIS model to evaluate • GUI engine for cluster center drawing • Development of ANFIS toolset with frontend GUI • Develop the ANFIS Engine which will do the optimization • Develop User Interface for: • Display predicted tool-wear result • Evaluation of error

More Related