1 / 6

ESEA Reauthorization: NCLB and the Blueprint

ESEA Reauthorization: NCLB and the Blueprint. Based on information from: A Blueprint for Reform July 2010. Core Policies to Maintain in ESEA Reauthorization. Disaggregation and focus on improving performance for all groups of students. Focus on equity.

jane
Download Presentation

ESEA Reauthorization: NCLB and the Blueprint

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ESEA Reauthorization:NCLB and the Blueprint Based on information from: A Blueprint for Reform July 2010

  2. Core Policies to Maintain in ESEA Reauthorization Disaggregation and focus on improvingperformance for all groups of students Focus on equity Standards-based reform and accountability

  3. NCLB & Blueprint: Accountability NCLB Blueprint “Race to the bottom” for state standards States adopt college- and career-ready standards. Focus on proficiency; schools making progresscan still be “failing” Differentiation of schools based onstudent growth and school progress. Many ways to “fail,” no recognition for success Real rewards for high-poverty schools, districts and states showing real progress, especially in serving underserved populations and closing achievement gaps. Exclusive focus on tests, narrowing of curriculum Develop and support the use of better assessments. Look beyond assessments to determine what a school needs, including attendance, conditions for learning, course completion, to paint a fuller picture of a school. Allow use of additional subjects. Additional resources for developing a well-rounded curriculum

  4. NCLB & Blueprint: Accountability NCLB Blueprint Mandated SES and choice More local flexibility around how best to serve schools; no mandated SES or choice. Over-identifies schools Targets more limited portion of schools for significant intervention. Allowing persistently low-performing schoolsto avoid real change Meaningful change in persistently low-performing schools. Punitive/labelswithout support Meaningful investment in low-performing schools. All consequences focused at the school level Holding every level of the system responsible for improvement and support.

  5. NCLB & Blueprint: Teachers and Leaders NCLB Blueprint Not focused enough on building the professionand teacher voice Utilize surveys of teachers (around working conditions, professional development & support), and surveys of conditions for learning that include teacher perspective. No acknowledgementor support of teacher collaboration Invest in expanded learning time programs that provide more time for educators to plan and collaborate. Equitable distribution requirementsnot meaningful Greater focus on getting great teachers where they are needed most. Ignored need for better school leaders Invest in preparing and improving better leaders.

  6. NCLB & Blueprint: Broad Principles NCLB Blueprint Ignored important factorslike conditions for learning Make accountability about more than test scores for most schools. Fund development of measurement systems around conditions for learning. Narrow vision ofschool’s role Greater opportunities and structuresfor positive adult-student relationships. Funding for providing comprehensive services so that students are safe, healthy, able to focus on learning. No acknowledgement that equitable funding matters Encourage funding equity.

More Related