1 / 26

Anna Clements Enterprise Architect, IT Services University of St Andrews akc@st-andrews.ac.uk

CRIS for research outputs, outcomes and impact. Anna Clements Enterprise Architect, IT Services University of St Andrews akc@st-andrews.ac.uk. Agenda. Drivers in the UK CRIS at St Andrews Where we are now Challenges and next steps. Drivers in the UK.

jane
Download Presentation

Anna Clements Enterprise Architect, IT Services University of St Andrews akc@st-andrews.ac.uk

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CRIS for research outputs, outcomes and impact Anna Clements Enterprise Architect, IT ServicesUniversity of St Andrews akc@st-andrews.ac.uk

  2. Agenda • Drivers in the UK • CRIS at St Andrews • Where we are now • Challenges and next steps

  3. Drivers in the UK All want reports on outputs, outcomes, impact Research grants Will our researchers continue to win grants? Money RAE2008 > £1.5 billion St Andrews £18 million [1/3 of our research income] Reputation League Tables & bench-marking

  4. Sep 2009

  5. Sep 2009 CERIF CERIF CERIF

  6. Drivers in the UK All want reports on outputs, outcomes, impact Research grants Will our researchers continue to win grants? Money RAE2008 > £1.5 billion St Andrews £18 million [1/3 of our research income] Reputation League Tables & bench-marking

  7. RCUK Research Outcomes Project

  8. Drivers in the UK All want reports on outputs, outcomes, impact Research grants Will our researchers continue to win grants? Money RAE2008 > £1.5 billion St Andrews £18 million [1/3 of our research income] Reputation League Tables & bench-marking

  9. Research data sets • RCUK Common Principles of Data Policy [2011] • http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/Pages/DataPolicy.aspx • Publicly funded research data are a public good, produced in the public interest, which should be made openly available with as few restrictions as possible in a timely and responsible manner that does not harm intellectual property in the UK

  10. Research data sets • To enable research data to be discoverable and effectively re-used by others, sufficient metadata should be recorded and made openly available to enable other researchers to understand the research and re-use potential of the data. Published results should always include information on how to access the supporting data.

  11. Agenda • Drivers in the UK • CRIS at St Andrews • Where we are now • Challenges and next steps

  12. Impact Activities Publications Industry / SME’s Interface HEI – Strategic Planning, Benchmarking REF, RCUK SFC, HESA Public, Media Recognition / Impact Collaborations Research Pools Award/ recognition Indicators WoS, arXiv, PubMed, Scopus… Case Studies Dissemination// Engagement Bibtex, Refman Measures Entered Manual Input Entered Uploaded Harvested University Structure [HR] Entered Research Information System Staff Records [HR] Pulled In Fed Out Student Records [Registry] Linked Linked Projects, Grants, KT [Finance] Full Text Repository Open Access e-Research Repository (Open Access)

  13. Agenda • Drivers in the UK • CRIS at St Andrews • Where we are now • Challenges and next steps

  14. Where we are now

  15. Where we are now

  16. Where we are now

  17. Where we are now

  18. Where we are now

  19. Agenda • Drivers in the UK • CRIS at St Andrews • Where we are now • Challenges and next steps

  20. Challenges and next steps • Model • Impact .. Just what and how to measure? • Outcome .. Is this cfResultProduct or something wider? • Clear definitions e.g. those from Australia?

  21. Definitions

  22. Challenges and next steps • Interoperability • authority list services - organisations; journals; publishers • name disambiguation – ORCID http://orcid.org or OKKAM? www.okkam.org • Defined common semantics e.g. output types, researcher roles • A standard CERIF ‘production’ model & tools to facilitate data exchange and aggregation

  23. Challenges and next steps • Data sources • affordable bibliographic [and bibliometric?] data • funders providing CERIF data [and vice-versa] • Should we be moving data around … or should we concentrate on reusing it from authoritative source [in the cloud?] … how realistic and in what timescale?

  24. Challenges and next steps • Research Data • Where and how is CERIF useful? • Are extensions necessary? • Issues of access and security • What data should we concentrate on? • Some answers [and more questions?] from upcoming JISC funded C4D project

  25. Impact Activities Publications Industry / SME’s Interface HEI – Strategic Planning, Benchmarking REF, RCUK SFC, HESA Public, Media Recognition / Impact Collaborations Research Pools Award/ recognition Indicators WoS, arXiv, PubMed, Scopus… Case Studies Dissemination// Engagement MICE Bibtex, Refman Measures Entered WoS API Cerify Manual Input Entered Uploaded Harvested University Structure [HR] Entered Research Information System Staff Records [HR] REF2014 Readiness4Ref Pulled In Fed Out Student Records [Registry] Linked Linked Authority data from RCs IRIOS Projects, Grants, KT [Finance] C4D Pooling CRISPool Full Text Repository Open Access e-Research Repository (Open Access)

  26. Outcome and Impact of another kind … Thank you! Anna Clements Enterprise Architect, IT ServicesUniversity of St Andrews akc@st-andrews.ac.uk

More Related