110 likes | 286 Views
EMRs. The potential for EMRs has been recognized since the 1960'sBenefits include cost savings, reduced medical errors, and improved quality and continuity of care Despite benefits, adoption has been slow Structural and organizational issues have been cited as barriers to adoption . Purpose. To u
E N D
1. The Role of Provider Perceptions in Deploying an EMR at Michigan State University Pamela Whitten, PhD
Lorraine Buis, PhD
Michigan State University
Michael Mackert, PhD
University of Texas at Austin
2. EMRs The potential for EMRs has been recognized since the 1960’s
Benefits include cost savings, reduced medical errors, and improved quality and continuity of care
Despite benefits, adoption has been slow
Structural and organizational issues have been cited as barriers to adoption
3. Purpose To understand the role and impact of individual and organizational issues on perceptions regarding EMRs by physicians at Michigan State University (MSU).
This investigation sought to identify:
Perceptions of the general impacts of EMRs
Initial and current attitudes toward EMR adoption
Perceptions of the success and impacts MSUs EMR Relationships between demographic or experiential variables and perceptions of the EMR system
4. Methods 41 providers from MSU HealthTeam
Gender: 66% male and 34% female
Age: 41% were 35 – 50 and 51% were 50+
Computer Skills: 56% rate skills and high and none report skills “below average”
MSU EMR rollout
5. Survey Instrument 144 item survey
Based on Lćrum, Ellingsen, and Faxvaag (2001)
Approximately 30 minute completion time
Descriptive statistics were employed to understand perceptions of EMRs in general and at MSU
6. Results Providers report positive perceptions of the general impacts of EMRs
Majority believe EMRs have or will have a beneficial impact on:
Access to healthcare in rural areas (83%)
Clinicians’ access to up to date knowledge (80%)
Quality of healthcare (71%)
Interactions within the health team (68%)
Continuing medical education (68%)
7. Results Providers report mixed perceptions regarding adoption and overall success of the system at MSU
45% favored adoption initially and still consider it a good choice
11% didn’t initially favor adoption, but now consider it a good choice
34% initially favored adoption, but now consider it a bad choice
11% initially opposed the adoption and still consider it a bad choice
8. Results Ratings of EMR success at MSU were mixed
27% rating as good or excellent
56% rating as fair
17% rating as poor
Ratings of EMR satisfaction at MSU were mixed
37% rating as good or excellent
34% rating as fair
29% rating as poor
9. Results No demographic variables were consistently related to perceptions of the success and satisfaction of the EMR system at MSU.
Age was found to be negatively correlated with the perceived satisfaction of the EMR system at MSU
(r = -.401, p<.05)
10. Results Several measures of the perception of potential impacts of EMRs on healthcare were related to success and satisfaction
Particularly, beliefs that EMRs have impacts on:
Quality of healthcare
Enjoyment on the practice of medicine
Interactions within the health team
Rapport between clinicians and patients
Clinician autonomy
11. Results
12. Discussion Mixed feelings toward adoption indicates a need to involve users in decision making to increase buy-in
Perceptions of the impacts of EMRs have greater impact on success and satisfaction than demographics
Speaks to the need to increase EMR education