Physics Opportunities in a NuMI Offaxis Experiment . Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University September 16, 2002 London, England. Outline. Introductory Comments Advantages of an Off-axis Beam Important Physics Issues NuMI Capabilities. Introduction.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
September 16, 2002
The current generation of long and medium baseline terrestial n oscillation experiments is designed to:
Confirm SuperK results with accelerator n’s (K2K)
Demonstrate oscillatory behavior of nm’s (MINOS)
Make precise measurement of oscillation parameters (MINOS)
4. Demonstrate explicitly nmnt oscillation mode by
detecting nt’s (OPERA, ICARUS)
5. Improve limits on nmne subdominant oscillation
mode, or detect it (MINOS, ICARUS)
Resolve the LSND puzzle (MiniBooNE)
Confirm indications of LMA solution (KamLAND)
Many issues in neutrino physics will then still remain unresolved. Next generation experiments will try to address them.
Compare En spectra from10,15, and 20 GeV p’s
NuMI beam can produce 1-3 GeV intense beams with well defined energyin a cone around the nominal beam direction
Antineutrinos are crucial to understanding:
High energy experience: antineutrinos are ‘expensive’.
Ingredients: s(p+)~3s(p-) (large x)
For the same number of POT
NuMI ME beam energies:
s(p+)~1.15s(p-) (charge conservation!)
Neutrino/antineutrino events/proton ~ 3
(no Pauli exclusion)