E N D
1. M2P2: “Mini Magnetosphere Plasma Propulsion” Kelly Wallenstein
May 10, 2007
22.012 Additional notes: This is to expand on the talk a few weeks ago, “Space Propulsion with Plasma”Additional notes: This is to expand on the talk a few weeks ago, “Space Propulsion with Plasma”
2. M2P2 = “Mini-Magnetosphere Plasma Propulsion”
Also known as a “plasma sail”
Concept proposed by geophysicist Robert Winglee (U. Wash.)
Has been successfully tested on Earth, but not deployed in space.
3. Inspiration: Magnetic Sail Deploy a large loop of superconducting wire to generate a magnetic field
Field deflects charged particles radiated by the Sun, which provides momentum to accelerate the spacecraft After first bullet: (and auxiliary loops for steering)After first bullet: (and auxiliary loops for steering)
4. M2P2 Use smaller loops + plasma to get the effect of bigger loops
5. Mechanism Solar Cells power solenoid coils on spacecraft
Inject a cloud of plasma (~ pickle jar sized)
Mag. field causes plasma to become dense/magnetized
Plasma is trapped in field lines
6. Mechanism, cont’d. Plasma cloud is conductive ? induced current
Field is inflated by plasma, similar to the way a balloon is inflated by hot air
Field lines are dragged outward to a radius of 18-36 miles around the spacecraft
Interaction with the solar wind is greatly increased
8. Solar wind (stream of charged particles) would act on field as with a magnetic sail
Solar wind is deflected
Wind is made of protons moving at a speed of 350 to 800 km/s
Protons have mass
? Momentum is transferred to spacecraft, craft accelerates
12. If the electric current through the solenoid drops, the plasma can deionize and escape
This shrinks the large “sail” field
Gas must be stored to replace ions that leak from the plasma
13. The Plasma Argon or helium?
Prototype uses argon
More massive, so ions move more slowly
?Easier to contain
Helium more likely for the future
Less massive, so ions move more quickly
?Harder to contain / more leakage
BUT might give more velocity per kilogram
14. What makes this concept better than others? A) Maintains thrust as distance from Sun increases
Efficiencies of (normal) magnetic and solar sails decrease with square of distance from Sun
M2P2 field expands as solar wind density decreases
15. B) No erosion of components
Plasma rocket components (e.g. nozzle) come in contact with hot plasma
In M2P2, plasma is confined by a magnetic field
C) Suitable for long distances
Plasma rockets require lots of electric power, which is limited in space
In M2P2: 3 kW electricity to run solenoid would come from solar cells; 3 kg helium ? 3 months
16.
D) Reduced Mass
Solar sails are large and need to be deployed
Normal magnetic sails would need huge coils for comparable power
M2P2: Field is made by electromagnetic processes and lies outside the craft
17. Comparisons Theoretically 10X faster than space shuttle (4.3 million miles/day vs. 430,000 miles/day)
“Specific Impulse,” or thrust/propellant is 200X better (200 kN·s/kg) than space shuttle main engine
Could overtake Pioneers 10 & 11 and Voyagers 1 & 2 (launched in the 1970s) to be first manmade object to leave solar system
20. Sources http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solarsystem/m2p2_propulsion_817.html
http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/advanced_propulsion_020522-1.html
http://www.ess.washington.edu/Space/M2P2/
http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/prop19aug99_1.htm