1 / 47

Principal mechanisms of ligand exchange in octahedral complexes

Principal mechanisms of ligand exchange in octahedral complexes. Dissociative. Associative. MOST COMMON. Dissociative pathway (5-coordinated intermediate). Associative pathway (7-coordinated intermediate). Experimental evidence for dissociative mechanisms.

Download Presentation

Principal mechanisms of ligand exchange in octahedral complexes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Principal mechanisms of ligand exchange in octahedral complexes Dissociative Associative

  2. MOST COMMON Dissociative pathway (5-coordinated intermediate) Associative pathway (7-coordinated intermediate)

  3. Experimental evidence for dissociative mechanisms Rate is independent of the nature of L

  4. Experimental evidence for dissociative mechanisms Rate is dependent on the nature of L

  5. Inert and labile complexes Some common thermodynamic and kinetic profiles Exothermic (favored, large K) Large Ea, slow reaction Stable intermediate Exothermic (favored, large K) Large Ea, slow reaction Endothermic (disfavored, small K) Small Ea, fast reaction

  6. Labile or inert? LFAE = LFSE(sq pyr) - LFSE(oct)

  7. Inert ! Why are some configurations inert and some are labile?

  8. Substitution reactions in square-planar complexes the trans effect (the ability of T to labilize X)

  9. Synthetic applications of the trans effect Cl- > NH3, py

  10. Mechanisms of ligand exchange reactions in square planar complexes

  11. M1(x +1)+Ln + M2(y-1)+L’n M1(x+)Ln + M2(y+)L’n Electron transfer (redox) reactions -1e (oxidation) +1e (reduction) Very fast reactions (much faster than ligand exchange) May involve ligand exchange or not Very important in biological processes (metalloenzymes)

  12. Outer sphere mechanism [Fe(CN)6]3- + [IrCl6]3- [Fe(CN)6]4- + [IrCl6]2- [Co(NH3)5Cl]+ + [Ru(NH3)6]3+ [Co(NH3)5Cl]2+ + [Ru(NH3)6]2+ Reactions ca. 100 times faster than ligand exchange (coordination spheres remain the same) r = k [A][B] Tunneling mechanism

  13. Inner sphere mechanism [Co(NH3)5Cl)]2+:::[Cr(H2O)6]2+ [Co(NH3)5Cl)]2+ + [Cr(H2O)6]2+ [CoIII(NH3)5(m-Cl)CrII(H2O)6]4+ [Co(NH3)5Cl)]2+:::[Cr(H2O)6]2+ [CoII(NH3)5(m-Cl)CrIII(H2O)6]4+ [CoIII(NH3)5(m-Cl)CrII(H2O)6]4+ [CoII(NH3)5(m-Cl)CrIII(H2O)6]4+ [CoII(NH3)5(H2O)]2+ + [CrIII(H2O)5Cl]2+ [CoII(NH3)5(H2O)]2+ [Co(H2O)6]2+ + 5NH4+

  14. Inner sphere mechanism Reactions much faster than outer sphere electron transfer (bridging ligand often exchanged) r = k’ [Ox-X][Red] k’ = (k1k3/k2 + k3) Tunneling through bridge mechanism

  15. Brooklyn College Chem 76/76.1/710GAdvanced Inorganic Chemistry(Spring 2008) Unit 6 Organometallic Chemistry Part 1 General Principles Suggested reading: Miessler/Tarr Chapters 13 and 14

  16. Elements of organometallic chemistry Complexes containing M-C bonds Complexes with p-acceptor ligands Chemistry of lower oxidation states very important Soft-soft interactions very common Diamagnetic complexes dominant Catalytic applications

  17. The d-block transition metals

  18. Main types of common ligands

  19. A simple classification of the most important ligands X L L2 L2X L3

  20. Method A Method B Ignore formal oxidation state of metal Count number of d electrons for M(0) Add d electrons + ligand electrons (B) Determine formal oxidation state of metal Deduce number of d electrons Add d electrons + ligand electrons (A) Counting electrons The end result will be the same

  21. Why is this relevant? Stable mononuclear diamagnetic complexes generally contain 18 or 16 electrons The reactions of such complexes generally proceed through 18- or 16-electron intermediates Although many exceptions can be found, these are very useful practical rules for predicting structural and reactivity properties C. A. Tollman, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1972, 1, 337.

  22. antibonding Why 18 electrons?

  23. Organometallic complexes 18-e most stable 16-e stable (preferred for Rh(I), Ir(I), Pt(II), Pd(II)) <16-e OK but usually very reactive > 18-e possible but rare generally unstable

  24. A closer look at some important ligands

  25. Typical -donor ligands

  26. Other important C-donor ligands

  27. Other important ligands

  28. Other important ligands

  29. The M-L-X game

  30. Each X will increase the oxidation number of metal by +1. Each L and X will supply 2 electrons to the electron count.

  31. Now looking at compounds having a charge of +1 to obey 18 e rule. Elec count: 4 (M) +2 (NO) +12 (L6) = 18 NO+ is isoelectronic to CO X increases O N by 1 Elec Count: 4 (M) + 4 (L2) + 10 (L5)

  32. Actors and spectators Actor ligands are those that dissociate or undergo a chemical transformation (where the chemistry takes place!) Spectator ligands remain unchanged during chemical transformations They provide solubility, stability, electronic and steric influence (where ligand design is !)

  33. Organometallic Chemistry 1.2 Fundamental Reactions

  34. Fundamental reaction of organo-transition metal complexes FOS: Formal Oxidation State; CN: Coordination Number NVE: Number of valence electrons

  35. Association-Dissociation of Lewis acids D(FOS) = 0; D(CN) = ± 1; D(NVE) = 0 Lewis acids are electron acceptors, e.g. BF3, AlX3, ZnX2 This shows that a metal complex may act as a Lewis base The resulting bonds are weak and these complexes are called adducts

  36. Association-Dissociation of Lewis bases D(FOS) = 0; D(CN) = ± 1; D(NVE) = ±2 A Lewis base is a neutral, 2e ligand “L” (CO, PR3, H2O, NH3, C2H4,…) in this case the metal is the Lewis acid Crucial step in many ligand exchange reactions For 18-e complexes, only dissociation is possible For <18-e complexes both dissociation and association are possible but the more unsaturated a complex is, the less it will tend to dissociate a ligand

  37. Vaska’s compound Oxidative addition-reductive elimination D(FOS) = ±2; D(CN) = ± 2; D(NVE) = ±2 Very important in activation of hydrogen

  38. Oxidative addition-reductive elimination Vaska’s compound H becomes H- Concerted reaction via Ir: Group 9 cis addition CH3+ has become CH3- SN2 displacement trans addition Also radical mechanisms possible

  39. Oxidative addition-reductive elimination Not always reversible

  40. Insertion-deinsertion D(FOS) = 0; D(CN) = 0; D(NVE) = 0 Mn: Group 7 Very important in catalytic C-C bond forming reactions (polymerization, hydroformylation) Also known as migratory insertion for mechanistic reasons

  41. Migratory Insertion Also promoted by including bulky ligands in initial complex

  42. Insertion-deinsertion The special case of 1,2-addition/-H elimination A key step in catalytic isomerization & hydrogenation of alkenes or in decomposition of metal-alkyls Also an initiation step in polymerization

  43. Attack on coordinated ligands Very important in catalytic applications and organic synthesis

  44. Some examples of attack on coordinated ligands Electrophilic addition Nucleophilic addition Electrophilic abstraction Nucleophilic abstraction

More Related