1 / 19

The Morality of Abortion

The Morality of Abortion. Outline. Introduction: What this chapter is about. The Person Argument. The question of Personhood. Marquis: An alternative to the person argument. Thomson: Is it always wrong to kill an innocent?. Conclusion. What this chapter is about

jamesporter
Download Presentation

The Morality of Abortion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Morality of Abortion Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana

  2. Outline Introduction: What this chapter is about The Person Argument The question of Personhood Marquis: An alternative to the person argument Thomson: Is it always wrong to kill an innocent? Conclusion

  3. What this chapter is about Deepening our understanding of the arguments on both sides Introduction: What is at stake? Two opposite values • The fetus’ ``right to life” • The mother’s ``right over her own body”

  4. Outline Introduction: What this chapter is about The Person Argument The question of Personhood Marquis: An alternative to the person argument Thomson: Is it always wrong to kill an innocent? Conclusion

  5. The Person Argument: The Person Argument An important distinction • P1: The fetus is an innocent person • P2: It is wrong to kill an innocent person • CC: It is wrong to kill a fetus The argument is valid: is it sound? P1: what is a person? P2: is it always true?

  6. Outline Introduction: What this chapter is about The Person Argument The question of Personhood Marquis: An alternative to the person argument Thomson: Is it always wrong to kill an innocent? Conclusion

  7. The question of personhood is crucial: To assess the argument, we need: • Either sufficient conditions that the fetus satisfies • Or necessary conditions that the fetus does not satisfy The question of Personhood The Problem What makes a person a person? Persons are what we don’t kill lightly • Class survey: what is ok to kill? • The alien thought experiment Is there any satisfactory criteria?

  8. Criteria often given by the opponents: Criteria often given by the defendants: The question of Personhood Discussion Being alive Human shape Human DNA Intelligence Communication skills Moral agent Problem: Problem: All animals Robots Any human cell Mentally handicapped and insane people TOO BROAD TOO NARROW

  9. The question of Personhood Conclusion The question of personhood: Dead end? A proposal:Sentience as a necessary and sufficient conditions for not killing lightly  The absurdities are thus avoided Consequences: • Animals • Fetus after 20th week Another option is to avoid the question of Personhood altogether: Marquis and Thomson

  10. Outline Introduction: What this chapter is about The Person Argument The question of Personhood Marquis: An alternative to the person argument Thomson: Is it always wrong to kill an innocent? Conclusion

  11. Beyond the question of personhood Marquis: A future like ours The question of wrongful killing: criteria? • Against desire? • Interruption of valuable experience? Marquis’ proposal:An instance of killing is wrong when it deprives someone of a valuable future like ours.  general explanation of why we think it is wrong to kill Consequences: • VAS ok • Wrong to kill humans, animals, and fetuses Marquis: abortion is wrong because it deprives the fetus of a valuable future like ours

  12. Beyond the question of personhood Steinbock: Objections against Marquis What does it take to have a future?: Personal identity, that is, a way to link the individual now to the future Two theories of personal identity: Physical Theory of identity (Phys-TI) Psychological Theory of identity (Psy-TI) Dilemma: • If Phys-TI, absurdity • If Psy-TI, then sentience is necessary As in the case of the Person Argument, it seems that there is no wrongful killing without sentience

  13. Outline Introduction: What this chapter is about The Person Argument The question of Personhood Marquis: An alternative to the person argument Thomson: Is it always wrong to kill an innocent? Conclusion

  14. Deals with Premise 2 of the Person Argument: Is it always wrong to kill an innocent person? Thomson and The Violinist Thomson’s analogy: hooked up on a violinist without consent Thomson’s analogy: In which cases would you think it is ok to unhook yourself?  Thomson’s point: the answer is not obvious  We have to distinguish between cases

  15. In which cases does the analogy work – Warren? • Rape • Mother’s health endangered Thomson’s Analogy: Assessment What about the other cases? – failure of birth control Jane English: performance and reception These are analogies: can we find a rational basis for the argument?

  16. Thomson’s main thesis: We are not morally obligated to help another in such circumstances, but it will be a great moral favor An Important Distinction: Moral Obligations vs. Moral Favor Moral Obligation Something that one must do on pain of immorality BLAME if not done Ex: keep your promise Moral Favor Something that one can do above moral obligations PRAISE if done Ex: Britney Spears’ Touch and the Good Samaritan Keeping the child in case of unwanted pregnancies is a moral favor, not a moral obligation

  17. Thomson’s main thesis on abortion: A continuum of cases, ranking from clear cases of great moral favors and moral indecency Thomson: Conclusion Moral Indecency Good Samaritan Moral favor Moral Obligation Sacrifice Beware of the slippery slope !

  18. Outline Introduction: What this chapter is about The Person Argument The question of Personhood Marquis: An alternative to the person argument Thomson: Is it always wrong to kill an innocent? Conclusion

  19. The Morality of Abortion Conclusion A central notion for wrongful killing:sentience An important distinction for assessing our actions Moral favors vs. Moral Obligation An important lesson for abortion: No straightforward answer but continuum of cases: • Clear cases in which abortion is wrong • Clear cases in which abortion is right • Continuum of cases in the middle

More Related