130 likes | 280 Views
Presentation Outline. . Introduction, Motivation, ObjectivesBackgroundPrevious experiences with PEX DHE installationsMethodologyField workTest data analysisResultsPossible DHE use in Puna District, HIConcluding summary. Introduction: What are DHEs?. . Closed-loop immersed in water wellsKnow
E N D
2. Presentation Outline Introduction, Motivation, Objectives
Background
Previous experiences with PEX DHE installations
Methodology
Field work
Test data analysis
Results
Possible DHE use in Puna District, HI
Concluding summary
3. Introduction:What are DHEs? Closed-loop immersed in water wells
Known installations in U.S., Turkey, and New Zealand
Less common/experimental installations in Iceland, Hungary, Russia, Italy, Greece, Japan
In U.S., most concentrated uses are in Klamath Falls, OR and Reno, NV
Over 500 DHE installations exist in Klamath Falls, OR
4. Some existing applications include:
Space heating of homes
Space heating of schools
Snow melting
Introduction:What are DHEs?
5. Project Motivation & Objectives Motivation:
Okahara & Associates, Inc. (2007) conducted a feasibility study of direct uses of geothermal energy in the Kapoho/Pohoiki area of Puna on the Island of Hawaii
Okahara & Associates, Inc. (2007) mentioned use of DHEs in Puna District, but actual performance and heat output of a DHE in Puna was unknown without a specific field test
Objectives:
Perform a thermal response test on an actual well in Puna to estimate long-term performance of a DHE
Field-demonstrate practicality of a PEX DHE installation on a remote well
6. Project Background:DHE Materials
7. Methodology:Area of Study
8. Methodology:Field Work Summary
9. Methodology:Thermal Response Test
10. Methodology:Thermal Response Test
11. Results:Thermal Response Test
12. Results:How Much Heat from the DHE?
13. Concluding Summary PEX DHEs proved easy to install (and remove) at remote locations
No heavy equipment needed
No glue or solder required
The well tested would not be a good candidate well for a DHE due to a thin water column and relatively low groundwater temperature
However, thermal response testing did show good thermal transport properties for DHEs
A well closer to the KERZ would presumably be hotter and more suitable for a DHE
14. Acknowledgements This work was funded by the GeoPowering the West Program through the GeoHeat Center, OIT under Midwest Research Institute, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Task Order No. KLDJ-5-55052-06.
The authors also acknowledge the efforts of Scott Kieffer (Oregon Institute of Technology) who performed most of the field work.