Marx (& Engels),
Download
1 / 5

- PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 434 Views
  • Uploaded on

Marx (& Engels), The German Ideology (1845-46) Moves from critique of “idealism” in Young Hegelians, etc. to a conception of “materialism” “The premises from which we begin . . .” (113) What constitutes “material”? not just consciousness, but production,

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about '' - jaden


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Slide1 l.jpg

Marx (& Engels), The German Ideology (1845-46)

Moves from critique of “idealism” in Young Hegelians, etc.

to a conception of “materialism”

“The premises from which we begin . . .” (113)

What constitutes “material”?

not just consciousness, but production,

human practice & activity (114)

Examples in text?

History then becomes history of modes of production

Division and specialization of labor becomes motor of

historical change

a) tribal (land, family, barter)

b) ancient communal/State (private property,

commerce, slavery, town)

c) feudal (country, guilds, industry vs. commerce)

d) industrial/capital

Marx 1839 & 1875,

csf.colorado.edu/mirrors/marxists.org/


Slide2 l.jpg

Marx, cont.

The camera obscura metaphor for epistemology (118)

ideology not transparent in relation to material conditions

emphasis on the phantasmal series of historical contingencies

which produce the sense of lack of will, the sense of “accidental” historical conditions as “fate” or “destiny

lack of correspondence the motive for change

Philosophy dies as a metaphysical, theological, religious inquiry,

true “universally” & under “all conditions” (119)

Philosophy reborn as an inquiry into changing conditions of history

Notion of Alienation, estrangement (adapted from Hegel) (124)

an historical self-division of man from labor, not a permanent

psychological one as with Freud

Existence/essence debate (132)

“The existence of a thing or a man . . “

History becomes history of class struggle (125)


Slide3 l.jpg

What is communism for Marx?

(124) “In communist society . . .”

only possible with global conditions of capital production

To what degree is Marx’s formulation of future communist utopia a remnant, a palimpsest of Christian thinking (within a “Jewish” thinker’s program), that is a projection of the apocalyptic, post- historic unity of humanity in Christianity onto the history of modes of production?

How conceive of change?

Neo as parable of change, saltology, paralogy

While revolutionary in discourse, Marx sometimes more evolutionary in practice: see his (somewhat failed) attempt to ally with the bourgeoisie when he returned to Rhineland during 1848 Revolution


Slide4 l.jpg

How make a history of voiceless (127)

Activist philosophy

Effects of unequal distribution of wealth

40 acres & a mule

Science not objective (135)

Critique of universalism (137-38)

Anti-humanist (139)

Law not objective (151)

justice vs. law

U.S. immigration laws regarding “Asians”

See Ronald Takaki, Strangers from a Different Shore : a History of Asian Americans

Is revolution always against State? (157)

is it now against “global capitalism”?

Cornell West, how imagine values so not reduced to market values?


Slide5 l.jpg

For next time: Freud, The Interpretation of Dreams

How do Freud’s theories attempt to explain how self-division operates?

How, practically, are his writings an explanation of the activities of the multiple parts of consciousness?

If Marx was trying to explain discrepancies, contradictions, non- transparencies between historical modes of production and historical forms of class consciousness (which discrepancies then produce the consciousness of a need for historical change & revolution), how is Freud trying to explain similar non- correspondences within the psyche?

Is therapy an evolutionary or revolutionary paradigm of change?


ad