slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Encouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants: The Role of Perceptions, Communication and Data Collection

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 46

Encouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants: The Role of Perceptions, Communication and Data Collection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 347 Views
  • Uploaded on

Encouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants: The Role of Perceptions, Communication and Data Collection Council of Osteopathic Medical Admissions Officers Society of Osteopathic Medical Educators June 27-29, 2007 Program Overview Identification of Admission Data:

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Encouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants: The Role of Perceptions, Communication and Data Collection' - jaden


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Encouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants: The Role of Perceptions, Communication and Data Collection

Council of Osteopathic Medical Admissions Officers

Society of Osteopathic Medical Educators

June 27-29, 2007

program overview
Program Overview

Identification of Admission Data:

Matriculants vs. Non-Matriculants

(A Three Year + Analysis)

National (AACOM)

Private (Western U/COMP)

State (OU-COM)

Discussion of Data and Implications for the Future

program overview3
Program Overview

Communication and Perceptions

National Communication (AACOM)

Institutional & Constituent Communication Western U/COMP

OU-COM

Discussion and Implications for the Future

program overview4
Program Overview

Data Collection

The Benefits of Collaboration on

Data Collection

Discussion and Implications for the Future

Summary and Conclusion

encouraging truly osteopathic matriculants
Encouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants

Matriculants Compared to Applicants at All Osteopathic Colleges

(applicant data points do not include UNTHSC)

EC 2002

Matriculants n=2963

Applicants N=6683

encouraging truly osteopathic matriculants6
Encouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants

Matriculants Compared to Applicants at All Osteopathic Colleges

(applicant data points do not include UNTHSC)

EC 2003

Matriculants n=3223

Applicants N=7140

encouraging truly osteopathic matriculants7
Encouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants

Matriculants Compared to Applicants at All Osteopathic Colleges

(applicant data points do not include UNTHSC)

EC 2004

Matriculants n=3536

Applicants N=7629

encouraging truly osteopathic matriculants8
Encouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants

Matriculants Compared to Applicants at All Osteopathic Colleges

(applicant data points do not include UNTHSC)

EC 2005

Matriculants n=3804

Applicants N=8562

encouraging truly osteopathic matriculants9
Encouraging Truly Osteopathic Matriculants

Matriculants Compared to Applicants at All Osteopathic Colleges

(applicant data points do not include UNTHSC)

EC 2006 (preliminary data)

Matriculants n=3929

Applicants N=9737

matriculants vs non matriculants westernu comp
Matriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsWesternU/COMP

EC 2004

N = 423

Matriculants n=198

Science Non-Science Overall MCAT

3.40 3.57 3.48 26.4

Non-Matriculants n = 225

Science Non-Science Overall MCAT

3.45 3.59 3.52 26.3

matriculants vs non matriculants westernu comp11
Matriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsWesternU/COMP

EC 2005

N = 550

Matriculants n=213

Science Non-Science Overall MCAT

3.41 3.50 3.45 26.6

Non-Matriculants n = 337

Science Non-Science Overall MCAT

3.47 3.56 3.57 27.7

24% to MD 29% to DO 25% deferred

4% not attending medical school 18% no response*

*attending medical school

matriculants vs non matriculants westernu comp12
Matriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsWesternU/COMP

EC 2006

N = 525

Matriculants n=218

Science Non-Science Overall MCAT

3.43 3.56 3.49 26.9

Non-Matriculants n = 307

Science Non-Science Overall MCAT

3.47 3.56 3.59 27.4

12% to MD 52% to DO 31% deferred,

5% not attending medical school

matriculants vs non matriculants ou com
Matriculants vs. Non-Matriculants OU-COM

EC 2004 N=180

Matriculants n=114

Science Non-Science Over-all MCAT

3.39 3.60 3.49 25.3

Non-Matriculants n=66

3.45 3.58 3.54 27.9

65% to MD 18% to DO 14% Deferred

3% - Not Attending Med School

matriculants vs non matriculants ou com14
Matriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsOU-COM

EC 2005 N=148

Matriculants n=108

Science Non-Science Over-All MCAT

3.45 3.66 3.54 24

Non-Matriculants n=40

3.54 3.73 3.63 27

59% to MD 17% to DO 22% Deferred

2% Not Attending Med School

matriculants vs non matriculants ou com15
Matriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsOU-COM

EC 2006N=161

Matriculants n=108

Science Non-Science Over-All MCAT

3.47 3.64 3.55 24.6

Non-Matriculants n=53

3.56 3.72 3.63 27.3

75% to MD 13% to DO 8% Deferred

4% Not Attending Med School

matriculants vs non matriculants ou com comp
Matriculants vs. Non-MatriculantsOU-COM/COMP

Additional Observations & Characteristics

* Personal Essays; Primary & Secondary

* Letters of Recommendation From

D.O.’s

* Perceived Osteopathic Orientation During

Interviews

* D.O. vs M.D. shadowing experience

non matriculant survey westernu comp
Non-Matriculant Survey – WesternU/COMP
  • Students who declined or withdrew after acceptance were online surveyed
  • All responses were voluntary and non-traceable to the respondent
  • Office of Institutional Research gathers, analyzes, and reports the data
  • Many respondents do not answer all questions
  • The Survey has evolved somewhat each year
interview and application experiences
Interview and Application Experiences

Consistently from 2004-2006

  • 62% felt the Interview Day increased their interest in WesternU
  • 88% of students felt the application experience was as good as or better than other schools
matriculant data ec 2006
Matriculant Data – EC 2006
  • Freshman students in the College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific were invited to respond to an online survey from August 24 through September 10, 2006 asking why they decided to enroll at WesternU.
  • With 55 responses out of a class of 219 students, the response rate was 25.1%.
reasons for comp matriculation
Reasons For COMP Matriculation

Educational Offerings

Curriculum 73%

Philosophy of Teaching and Learning 53%

Clinical Educational Training 49%

Academic Reputation 35%

Regional Location

Southern California 71%

reasons for comp matriculation26
Reasons for COMP Matriculation

Founding Principles

WesternU Philosophy of Humanism 62%

Admission Experience

Students Met Face to Face 60%

Timing of WesternU Decision 47%

How Well Treated in Process 42%

Faculty Met Face to Face 40%

matriculant areas of concern
Matriculant Areas of Concern

Location in Pomona 16%

Costs of Tuition and Housing 16%

Appearance, Quality of Buildings 11%

Campus Safety 9%

Very similar to Non-Matriculants, but at much lower level and did not prevent acceptance

matriculant sources of information
Matriculant Sources of Information

WesternU Website 67%

Students I Communicated With 63%

Non WesternU Websites (AACOM, etc) 50%

Interview Day presentations 49%

Interview Orientation Booklet 43%

Information from tour guide 40%

Faculty I Communicated With 32%

WesternU Literature 21%

Information from Staff 21%

discussion
Discussion

Matriculant vs. Non-Matriculant Data?

Inferences?

Thoughts?

role of perceptions communication
Role of Perceptions & Communication

Perceptions and Communication

OU-COM/COMP

Distinctiveness and Parity

Patient Centered

Primary Care

Full Scope Practice

roles of perceptions communication
Roles of Perceptions & Communication

OU-COM/COMP

Print Media

*Viewbook

*CORE Clinical Brochures

* Research & Clinical Review

*Today’s D.O.

roles of perceptions communication34
Roles of Perceptions & Communication

OU-COM/COMP

Electronic Media

*Web Presence

*Electronic Newsletter

*Electronic Discussion Boards

roles of perceptions communication35
Roles of Perceptions & Communication

OU-COM/COMP

Personal Contact

*Accessibility

Student & Family

Pre-Professional Advisors

* Emphasis on Relationships

Reflective of the Osteopathic Approach

role of perceptions communication36
Role of Perceptions & Communication

External Constituents

National Association of Advisors for the

Health Professions (NAAHP)

* Print and Web Presence

* “The Advisor” NAAHP Journal

* National Meetings

roles of perception communication
Roles of Perception & Communication

External Constituents

*North East Association of Advisors to the Health

Professions (NEAAHP)

*Central Association of Advisors

for the Health Professions (CAAHP)

- Web Presence

- Regional Meetings

- GSA Co-Sponsored

Meetings

roles of perceptions communication38
Roles of Perceptions & Communication

External Constituents

*Southeastern Association of Advisors for the

Health Professions (SAAHP)

*Western Association of Advisors for the Health

Professions (WAAHP)

- Web Presence

- PreMedical Advisor’s Reference

Manual

- Regional Meetings

roles of perceptions communication39
Roles of Perceptions & Communication

External Constituents

*Keepsake - A Guide for Minority

Science Students

*Newsweek Magazine –Hero M.D.

*ER/Gray’s Anatomy/House MD

data collection
Data Collection

“I can’t have information I know would be of interest to someone and not share it.”

- Sanford Berman

(former head cataloger, Hennepin County

Library System)

data collection41
Data Collection

Opportunities for and from sharing data

*Common non-matriculating student survey administered thorough AACOMAS

*Standard reports comparing matriculants and non-matriculants

- individual college compared to all COMs

- individual college compared to cohort COMs

* Other ideas?

data collection42
Data Collection
  • Collaboration and data collection can help identify institutional challenges and national challenges
  • Collaboration and data collection and Complete data sets contribute to the body of knowledge necessary for quality evaluation and assessment
  • Evaluation and assessment are integral to institutional advancement and the advancement of the profession

(Accreditation Teams like it too!)

data collection43
Data Collection

Questions & Discussion

Future Directions & Implications

summary
Summary

Matric & Non-Matric Data

Perceptions & Communication

Data Collection

Importance of Collaboration

contact information

Contact Information:

Susan Hansen, M.S. - Western U/COMP

[email protected]

Thomas Levitan, M.Ed. – AACOM

[email protected]

John D. Schriner, Ph.D. - OU-COM

[email protected]

Harold C. Thompson III, D.O. - OU-COM

[email protected]

Bart Yee, D.O. - Western U/COMP

[email protected]

thank you
THANK YOU!!!

We Appreciated Your Time and Attention

Have a Great Day!

ad